Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:27 am

I already did.

You should learn to read.
 

reading, writing, arithmetic programming brains to mind possibilities rather than navigate time occupying space now.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 7:59 am

sounds a lot like...

Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.

I don't read your followups in defense of complete ****.

Again: You "know" what you "know".
Who are you trying to convince? Yourself...  Very simple.

Stay awkward, ****.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:01 am

That's pretty much the point Burger labors.

He's wrong. 

RevolutionaryKing » 10 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm

I support the second amendment, and I was once even part of the NRA, but after a series of recent mass shootings, I'm starting to question my stance. I think maybe its time limit access to guns: My proposal -

-Limit guns to people over 25.

-Limit the number of gun stores allowed to open per year.--
Require an x amount of hours of training.

 -A person must go through two background checks, A federal and state check. 

- Ammunition can only be purchased through government providers.

- Cease all operations of online gun stores.

how bout this instead:

Limit guns to free white men of good character.. 

You know.. the only people this country allowed to be citizens for 200 years
 
 

FOS » 11 Jul 2022, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 5:47 pm

how bout this instead:

Limit guns to free white men of good character.. 

You know.. the only people this country allowed to be citizens for 200 years
 
 

misrepresentative ^^^^^^^ of life in plain sight, by his own choice.

Neo » 11 Jul 2022, 5:35 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 5:35 pm

He's wrong.

:rofl:  

 

DeezerShoove » 11 Jul 2022, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 2:45 pm

I don't read your followups in defense of complete ****.

Again: You "know" what you "know".
Who are you trying to convince? Yourself...  Very simple.

Stay awkward, ****.

You're every bit as dumb as Vegas.

RevolutionaryKing » 10 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm

I support the second amendment, and I was once even part of the NRA, but after a series of recent mass shootings, I'm starting to question my stance. I think maybe its time limit access to guns: My proposal -

-Limit guns to people over 25.

-Limit the number of gun stores allowed to open per year.--
Require an x amount of hours of training.

 -A person must go through two background checks, A federal and state check. 

- Ammunition can only be purchased through government providers.

- Cease all operations of online gun stores.

You do not support the 2nd Amendment and were never a member of the NRA.  And, here is why:

• You clearly do not understand the NICS Background check or how it works.  It picks up all state crimes that are punishable by more than 1 year incarceration.  A state background check is stupid and not necessary. All state data already feeds into NICS
• No NRA member would ever suggest that the GOVERNMENT be in charge of selling ammunition.  Dumb.  Nonsense.  And, definitely not something any NRA member (unless they joined just to screw gun owners) would ever suggest.
• No NRA member would ever champion cessation of "online gun stores".  That would actually be a violation of the 1st and 2nd Amendments.  All guns purchased over the internet from an "online" gun store must transfer through an FFL.  So, all you would be doing is restricting a person or company's freedom of speech.

You're a hack, a liar and not a friend of any 2nd Amendment supporting NRA member.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:05 am

Is the right in question an individual, or collective, right?

The "right" in question is an individual, not a collective, right.  The Supreme Court has specifically ruled on this issue determining that the 2nd Amendment prohibits the government from infringing on a person's right to bear arms, which is personal to him/her.  Go read the Heller decision.

FOS » 11 Jul 2022, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 5:47 pm

how bout this instead:

Limit guns to free white men of good character.. 

You know.. the only people this country allowed to be citizens for 200 years

Hell no.  As soon as you do that, then no one will have guns.  Only the government elites.  Let every law abiding citizen have access to guns. The more Blacks who legally own guns, the more protected my right to own them is.  
 
 

Skans » 11 Jul 2022, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:17 pm

The "right" in question is an individual, not a collective, right.  The Supreme Court has specifically ruled on this issue determining that the 2nd Amendment prohibits the government from infringing on a person's right to bear arms, which is personal to him/her.  Go read the Heller decision.

Before Antonin Scalia debased himself, it wasn't. 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:19 pm

Before Antonin Scalia debased himself, it wasn't.

Once upon a time, Neanderthals did not have access to guns.  Who F-ing cares.  Heller is now and Heller says its an individual right.  YOU LOSE.
 

Skans » 11 Jul 2022, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:19 pm

Hell no.  As soon as you do that, then no one will have guns.  Only the government elites.  Let every law abiding citizen have access to guns. The more Blacks who legally own guns, the more protected my right to own them is.

Excuse me. I'm a white man of good character and certainly not an elite.
 

Skans » 11 Jul 2022, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:21 pm

Once upon a time, Neanderthals did not have access to guns.  Who F-ing cares.  Heller is now and Heller says its an individual right.  YOU LOSE.

We're all losing.

Because you struggle with inadequacy. 
 

FOS » 11 Jul 2022, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:28 pm

Excuse me. I'm a white man of good character and certainly not an elite.

Yes, you are white.
Yes, you are a man.
Good character?  I really don't know one way or the other.
Elite?  Aren't you the son of some highfalutin liberal lawyer and related to a former Governor of GA?  And, you don't really care about the right of all law abiding citizens of the US to bear arms; just so long as the people YOU want to have 'em has access to them.  That is elitism and a sure-fire plan to make sure no non-elites ever have access to guns. 

I'd rather live in a nation where individuals occasionally skirmish with each other than be oppressed by an elitist over-lord bureaucratic dictatorship.
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 6:53 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 6:53 pm

You're every bit as dumb as Vegas.

That wouldn't have any effect on me coming from a person with credibility.

From you? It's complete nonsense.

btw
Vegas hates your guts. He can't be that dumb...  

FOS » 11 Jul 2022, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:28 pm

Excuse me. I'm a white man.

  Are you sure? From your picture you look more Latin than white.
 

DeezerShoove » 11 Jul 2022, 10:05 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:05 pm

That wouldn't have any effect on me coming from a person with credibility.

From you? It's complete nonsense.

btw
Vegas hates your guts. He can't be that dumb...

That wouldn't have any effect on me coming from a person with credibility.

when you are left to crib from Naffy....

From you? It's complete nonsense.

No...I nailed it.

It's what I do.

Vegas hates your guts. He can't be that dumb...

Clinically he's a moron.

FOS » 11 Jul 2022, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:28 pm

Excuse me. I'm a white man of good character and certainly not an elite.
 

everyone harboring an intellectual mind figures themself an elitist with an immortal soul of social conscience in a mortal sole's body. It is why you agree to typecast contextual character role playing cradle to grave but your sole time existing has two other sides to that time between womb to tomb. created conception to birth, eroded dead to decomposed.

Why do you think humans invented mummifying the royal we and the loyal they, them, and those people just rot in a grave.

I've concluded that most people on this forum are brainless.

A forum created for the illiterate & incompetent.