Resisting the urge to lunge at handcuffed prisoners and threaten their lives in state of raage so completely out of control that it translates into neck-grabbing a subordinate for doing her job as she was trained? That's not exactly "giving the yard ape his propers." It's just being a non-felonious officer.DeezerShoove » 28 Jul 2022, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Just so you know, I'm on nobody's side in this at all.
Mouthy **** in cuffs don't need much respect though.
Cops very often make above middle class wages - often on a high school education. We train them in de-escalation. They're paid good money to be better than average. They agree to be held to a higher standard.DeezerShoove » 28 Jul 2022, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑ It's probably half the reason he's wearing them. Still doesn't know to shut the **** up.
If so, I'd have no excuse to cry when held to the standard I promised - and failed - to hold myself to.DeezerShoove » 28 Jul 2022, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Day in and day out, I'd bet you'd be a tad abrasive after a while, too.
If you said that to my face you'd get the back of my hand, I tell ya.DeezerShoove » 28 Jul 2022, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑ You do get violently approachy and threateny here sometimes.
That was a ****** move - it rightly **** him. He was "only human" when he came down off his high horse and begged forgiveness.DeplorablePatriot » 28 Jul 2022, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Patton was "only human" when he slapped a soldier.
Says the guy who wants to empower police to torture his children.DeplorablePatriot » 28 Jul 2022, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ You're not deep in the thinking department, are you?
You would never guess it, but one of the governments with the highest standards for letting people cross their border is just across our border: Canada. Just having a US passport BY NO MEANS guarantees you entry. DUI - ever? No entry. Any felony - ever, even if expunged? No entry.DeplorablePatriot » 28 Jul 2022, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑
You seem to have a huge fear and disrespect for authority the way you carry on. Been in jail before?
I agree with the "held to a higher standard" theory. I wish it was a reality.Cannonpointer » 28 Jul 2022, 9:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Resisting the urge to lunge at handcuffed prisoners and threaten their lives in state of raage so completely out of control that it translates into neck-grabbing a subordinate for doing her job as she was trained? That's not exactly "giving the yard ape his propers." It's just being a non-felonious officer.
Cops very often make above middle class wages - often on a high school education. We train them in de-escalation. They're paid good money to be better than average. They agree to be held to a higher standard.
Those who balk at holding cops to a higher standard are usually sexually titillated blue bunnies who want some in-uniform play-time.
If so, I'd have no excuse to cry when held to the standard I promised - and failed - to hold myself to.
If you said that to my face you'd get the back of my hand, I tell ya.
I agree.DeplorablePatriot » 28 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑ No disrespect intended, GB, but often times a female cop can deescalate a situation better than the alpha type of male cop. Especially in a domestic dispute.
I saw one make a righteous shoot against a criminal druggie psychopath who definitely belonged behind bars. She was acting in self defense. the minute the animal was subdued, helpless and in pain, she began to comfort and reassure him while they waited for an ambulance.DeplorablePatriot » 28 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑ The other thing most cops, not all, may be in shape, but when attempting to wrestle down someone high on meth or PCP, even the strongest cops usually need assistance, unless they use deadly force or a taser, which also sometimes has minimal effect on a whacked-out druggie. And a well-trained female cop knows how to use her tools of defense. I know. I've been around the police community for a very long time.
Those are typically badly managed departments headed up by a compensating lickspittle wannabe. They often cost taxpayers a lot of money.DeplorablePatriot » 28 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I do, however love to see some departments...there's one in Georgia I've seen on TV, that has what looks like a department full of nothing but big, kick-*** Marines.
I have dealt with police many times in my life. Not always at picnics.DeplorablePatriot » 28 Jul 2022, 9:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Actually, mouthy, loud **** interrupt police communication and should be gagged and hog-tied. Lessons learned.
The five reddies you gave my post put the lie to this. ^DeezerShoove » 28 Jul 2022, 9:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I agree with the "held to a higher standard" theory. I wish it was a reality.
We pay for better. We deserve what we settle for.DeezerShoove » 28 Jul 2022, 9:43 pm » wrote: ↑ A long time ago I was held overnight in a city jail. It had gotten drunk out that night...![]()
I remember waking up next morning to a cop coming in to work.
He said to somebody (mostly for me to hear), "Looks like we got a bad guy!"
I always will remember the smug arrogance for a guy who hasn't even really been pushed at all yet.
How was this asshole at the end of the day?
I don't believe this young cop so many years ago even understood the "higher standard" theory.
Like I said, "I wish it was a reality."
You and I both know that reasoning from strength is not a sign of weakness. It's a sign of maturity and class - and is respected as such, even by punk-mouths. When a cop they are smart-mouthing remains calm, professional, and unaffected, they feel "this tall."DeezerShoove » 28 Jul 2022, 9:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Then there's the "Trying to reason with them is a sign of weakness" theory. Jus' sayin'...
What five reddies?Cannonpointer » 28 Jul 2022, 9:53 pm » wrote: ↑ The five reddies you gave my post put the lie to this. ^
We pay for better. We deserve what we settle for.
You and I both know that reasoning from strength is not a sign of weakness. It's a sign of maturity and class - and is respected as such, even by punk-mouths. When a cop they are smart-mouthing remains calm, professional, and unaffected, they feel "this tall."
The fellow who keeps his composure wins the argument, and I will murder anyone who says otherwise.
You.... you ..were picking on me...Cannonpointer » 28 Jul 2022, 10:01 pm » wrote: ↑ LMAO - sorry. For some reason I thought I was answering deplorable.
He's a piece of **** cop that put his hands on a woman. He's nobody to worry about.DeplorablePatriot » 28 Jul 2022, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Call the man a snowflake to his face, not here. He'd likely crush your skull.
Well, those F.O.P. lenses you must be wearing are working like gangbusters.DeezerShoove » 28 Jul 2022, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Felony battery? Whatta load of ****...
I saw a push not a grab.
No, just macing him, while in cuffs, in the back of a squad.DeezerShoove » 28 Jul 2022, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑Besides, the sarge wasn't beating the poor lil' innocent ute...
testament to the qulity of those F.O.P. lenses. Buy once, buy right, I always say.DeezerShoove » 28 Jul 2022, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑ She grabbed his belt trying to stop that from potentially happening. The only grab I saw.
I stand by what I said. He did not "grab" her neck.Cannonpointer » 29 Jul 2022, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, those F.O.P. lenses you must be wearing are working like gangbusters.
What the entire rest of the world sees is the woman - if that is her pronoun - being grabbed by the neck.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aNtxvoBXR4
No, just mcing him, while in cuffs, in the back of a squad.
testament to the qulity of those F.O.P. lenses. Buy once, buy right, I always say.
100s of video cameras all over the Capitol Campusnuckinfutz » 28 Jul 2022, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you ready to walk backwards now? Police State Rethuglirat!![]()
DeezerShoove » 29 Jul 2022, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑ I stand by what I said. He did not "grab" her neck.
You are lapping MSM pudding.
Ever seen a fight where somebody grabs a neck?
That palm on her chest shoving without a clenched hand is what you see as well.
Cannonpointer » 29 Jul 2022, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑ If a picture is worth a thousand words, a movie is worth more.
And that you think the MSM captured that footage is darling.
They should kiss you.
To me, anything not banned is MSM.Cannonpointer » 29 Jul 2022, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑ If a picture is worth a thousand words, a movie is worth more.
And that you think the MSM captured that footage is darling.
They should kiss you.
DeezerShoove » 29 Jul 2022, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ To me, anything not banned is MSM.
ps
Even a still would not show a "grab" cherry-picked out of hundreds of stills in that vid.
If you can show fingers around a throat, I take back everything... even those mom insults.