What is intelligence?

User avatar
By Monderegal
10 Aug 2022 12:29 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2 3 4
User avatar
Jinn Martini
10 Aug 2022 4:06 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
1,900 posts
Xavier_Onassis » 10 Aug 2022, 4:03 pm » wrote: You proved ME right, fool.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The fool is trying to engage me !

Ignorance is indeed bliss  . . .  and you excel in it !
 
User avatar
FOS
10 Aug 2022 4:30 pm
FOS
User avatar
      
5,595 posts
Monderegal » 10 Aug 2022, 3:16 pm » wrote: I'm a little confused. Purpose? How does that apply to intelligence?
think about it dude. Doing something requires some REASON to do that thing. The default is to do nothing. Rocks don't think because they have no reason to. What would a rock want to think about? 

what is in the interest of a rock?

what could possibly be part of some rock agenda?

your confusion seems from the innate human tendency to anthropomorphize everything. We like to pretend things are sentient when they are not. 

purpose has primacy over sentience. Our purpose is reproductive fitness. It is evolution. 

If my ancestors did not increase their reproductive fitness for say...inventing the gun...then I never would have inherited a talent for inventing things. 

The very simple model of evolution has very deep consequences about intelligence and about the nature of human beings. I actually  see fascism as merely a corollary to the theory of evolution. 
 
User avatar
Monderegal
10 Aug 2022 4:54 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,231 posts
FOS » 10 Aug 2022, 4:30 pm » wrote: think about it dude. Doing something requires some REASON to do that thing. The default is to do nothing. Rocks don't think because they have no reason to. What would a rock want to think about? 

what is in the interest of a rock?

what could possibly be part of some rock agenda?

your confusion seems from the innate human tendency to anthropomorphize everything. We like to pretend things are sentient when they are not. 

purpose has primacy over sentience. Our purpose is reproductive fitness. It is evolution. 

If my ancestors did not increase their reproductive fitness for say...inventing the gun...then I never would have inherited a talent for inventing things. 

The very simple model of evolution has very deep consequences about intelligence and about the nature of human beings. I actually  see fascism as merely a corollary to the theory of evolution.

Doesn't AI also have some underlying purpose if it acts in response to some stimuli? You ask Alexa to play a song and does it. The reason is what you asked it to do. I also think making human existence a Darwinian struggle a relic and not in line with how all of us choose to live our lives. Catholic priests and monks for instance take a vow of celibacy.  You can find this sort of behavior in many other cultures globally. Weren't not all just trying to score. Especially in cultures where pre marital sex is forbidden. 
Nothing is easier than defending the status quo.
User avatar
*GHETTO BLASTER
10 Aug 2022 5:20 pm
User avatar
      
12,770 posts
The ability to grasp abstract concepts like how current behaves and is manipulated in an electronic circuit.
The ARMY tried their best to place as many ****** as they could into their Electronic Equipment Repair MOS back when I served.
Quite a lot of their equipment is "modular" enough so that a technician doesn't need to have a very solid grasp of electrical theory to fix.
This is why most of the ****** that managed to pass DC CIRCUIT ANALYSIS ended up getting pushed into radio repair because quite often all those PRC-77s needed to start working again was to be repeatedly slammed against the work bench....




Image
User avatar
lapsedmember
10 Aug 2022 5:24 pm
User avatar
 
25 posts
Many people who scored at the top of the traditional tests decided to create their own tests. Kevin Langdon IQ 196 created the Langdon Adult Intelligence Test designed to measure people at the 1 in a million level. The state of California sued him and won and the judge ordered Langdon to stop using intelligence to describe his tests. So intelligence is what the state of California says it is. I know Langdon he calls me an idiot on a regular basis. https://web.archive.org/web/20190301134 ... stems.com/
User avatar
FOS
10 Aug 2022 5:43 pm
FOS
User avatar
      
5,595 posts
Monderegal » 10 Aug 2022, 4:54 pm » wrote: Doesn't AI also have some underlying purpose if it acts in response to some stimuli? You ask Alexa to play a song and does it. The reason is what you asked it to do. I also think making human existence a Darwinian struggle a relic and not in line with how all of us choose to live our lives. Catholic priests and monks for instance take a vow of celibacy.  You can find this sort of behavior in many other cultures globally. Weren't not all just trying to score. Especially in cultures where pre marital sex is forbidden.
Reacting to stimuli is not sentience. 

And humans act as an entire society... not as individuals. Your question about priests makes as much sense as asking why worker ants cannot reproduce. The whole community is the organism not one man. 
 
User avatar
Monderegal
10 Aug 2022 6:17 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,231 posts
FOS » 10 Aug 2022, 5:43 pm » wrote: Reacting to stimuli is not sentience. 

And humans act as an entire society... not as individuals. Your question about priests makes as much sense as asking why worker ants cannot reproduce. The whole community is the organism not one man.
Your answer was reproductive fitness. Not all societies are closely linked but are in kinship and many places practice arranged marriages. In fact, this used to be the norm in Western societies. Perhaps I invented the gun but my wife was arranged for me long before. The Darwin argument is also misplaced since people want different things in partners. At least on the human level it's not just horns and feathers.
Nothing is easier than defending the status quo.
User avatar
31st Arrival
11 Aug 2022 7:21 am
User avatar
      
24,770 posts
Xavier_Onassis » 10 Aug 2022, 4:02 pm » wrote: In the case of omh, it means that he likes to hear the two words "death spiral" used together.
Intelligence is not a science, it is a mental ability. There are a number of different aspects of intelligence.
The ability to recall related facts is one, the ability to distinguish between logical and illogical statements is another.
Talent in creating music, artwork and literature is another.  IQ tests measure some, but certainly not all of these.
Science invents working social theories life exceeds evolving spontaneously here simultaneously now.

Religion is faith now cannot be eternity because science suggestions time is manipulatively managed by diversion, distraction, disguise, distortion, denial, destruction of anyone insubordinate, traitor to beliefs, blasphemous against vernacular tribalism as a whole means to predetermining tomorrow's outcome today, every rotation of the planet ancestries change ancestors adapting to the moment here in series parallel displacement by the numbers present.

Thermodynamic genetics vs historical social paradigm.

never trust the power of suggestion that promises supernatural results while naturally occupying time inhabiting space here.
User avatar
SJConspirator
11 Aug 2022 7:53 am
User avatar
     
2,084 posts
FOS » 10 Aug 2022, 12:42 pm » wrote: intelligence itself is a rather vague word and open to interpretation.

the IQ test itself has a measurable value known as g, which basically represents across the board performance on the test...e.g. a highly stratified score will have little impact on g. the measure g seems to correspond most to what we intuitively consider 'intelligence'.

g has also been demonstrated as the most genetically heritable part of the iq test.

IQ has been studied in tremendous depth. there are a LOT of studies and literature on this general subject and it is not philosophy...it is science. Unfortunately the results of the science seems to make liberals cry, so there is some fake 'controversy' about it. but you can go ahead and read what the scientists have actually discovered about iq and g etc. There is no replication crisis in this field. it is very highly predictive. 

sure, it is sortof like athletics. people can be gifted in general but in order to be very good at something you do need training. FOr the most part g determines how long it takes to undergo this training, not so much what your plateau is. (whereas athletic ability is somewhat the opposite)
there are various kinds of intelligence.  Spatial intelligence, for example can help you navigate with no map, remember where your keys are, find your way in the dark, etc.  linguistic intelligence can help you communicate a series of important points in a short time.  Different types of intelligence can save your life during different types of crises.

intelligence is the mental acumen that has utility in the real world, I.e. being super philosophical is not a useful intelligence in my view because it renders no real world benefit for survival, success, etc..

If all the different types of intelligence are combined in a meta analysis, and one scores high on all of them, that person is exceptionally intelligent
 
 
User avatar
31st Arrival
11 Aug 2022 8:01 am
User avatar
      
24,770 posts
SJConspirator » 11 Aug 2022, 7:53 am » wrote: there are various kinds of intelligence.  Spatial intelligence, for example can help you navigate with no map, remember where your keys are, find your way in the dark, etc.  linguistic intelligence can help you communicate a series of important points in a short time.  Different types of intelligence can save your life during different types of crises.

intelligence is the mental acumen that has utility in the real world, I.e. being super philosophical is not a useful intelligence in my view because it renders no real world benefit for survival, success, etc..

If all the different types of intelligence are combined in a meta analysis, and one scores high on all of them, that person is exceptionally intelligent
 
 
intellectual plane outside natural evolving equally timed apart in plain sight. Reality isn't a natural order, it is the nature of the beasts corrupting their own species arriving one at a time cradle to grave.

People that crave more time invent scenarios life exceeds mutually evolving forward now. Geographical nation building protecting intellectual property rights to be paid royalties for generations by loyalists, compliant people never wanting more than true beliefs real doesn't matter, and context over content counts as all anyone can know morally, legally, ethically, economically staging rank gets the privileges the governed never received sacrificing their ancestral biological time manifesting realities into historical fruition here.
User avatar
Skans
11 Aug 2022 8:10 am
User avatar
      
13,098 posts
FOS » 10 Aug 2022, 12:42 pm » wrote: intelligence itself is a rather vague word and open to interpretation.

the IQ test itself has a measurable value known as g, which basically represents across the board performance on the test...e.g. a highly stratified score will have little impact on g. the measure g seems to correspond most to what we intuitively consider 'intelligence'.

g has also been demonstrated as the most genetically heritable part of the iq test.

IQ has been studied in tremendous depth. there are a LOT of studies and literature on this general subject and it is not philosophy...it is science. Unfortunately the results of the science seems to make liberals cry, so there is some fake 'controversy' about it. but you can go ahead and read what the scientists have actually discovered about iq and g etc. There is no replication crisis in this field. it is very highly predictive. 

sure, it is sortof like athletics. people can be gifted in general but in order to be very good at something you do need training. FOr the most part g determines how long it takes to undergo this training, not so much what your plateau is. (whereas athletic ability is somewhat the opposite)
Measuring intelligence using an IQ test is arguably a type of science, but it is somewhat crude and anecdotal at best.  It is actually more like carpentry where all of the measurements are taken using sonar; i.e the ability to indirectly measure something using feedback. 

The true science of directly measuring intelligence is still beyond our capabilities because we don't understand the exact nature of intelligence.  We can't model it, we can't biochemically enhance it, or repair it or even precisely alter it.  To do that we would have to fully understand the precise inner workings of the brain down to each chemical reaction inside of it acting in sequence.  Then, we would have to devise a method of directly testing and measuring an individual's brain chemistry for performance.  The IQ test, while useful and somewhat reliable, is far from being able to directly measure mental/intellectual performance.
 
User avatar
31st Arrival
11 Aug 2022 8:14 am
User avatar
      
24,770 posts
Skans » 11 Aug 2022, 8:10 am » wrote: Measuring intelligence using an IQ test is arguably a type of science, but it is somewhat crude and anecdotal at best.  It is actually more like carpentry where all of the measurements are taken using sonar; i.e the ability to indirectly measure something using feedback. 

The true science of directly measuring intelligence is still beyond our capabilities because we don't understand the exact nature of intelligence.  We can't model it, we can't biochemically enhance it, or repair it or even precisely alter it.  To do that we would have to fully understand the precise inner workings of the brain down to each chemical reaction inside of it acting in sequence.  Then, we would have to devise a method of directly testing and measuring an individual's brain chemistry for performance.  The IQ test, while useful and somewhat reliable, is far from being able to directly measure mental/intellectual performance.
 
always hiding behind the "we" pronoun. I understand the kinetics to genetic eternal separation of reproductive results occupying time inhabiting space specifically here never same total sum again forward, as living in series parallel displacement.

Intelligence and serenity of understanding my physical limitations "being human" one reproductive cycle present. I deciphered corrupted power of suggestion.
User avatar
31st Arrival
11 Aug 2022 8:19 am
User avatar
      
24,770 posts
Jinn Martini » 10 Aug 2022, 4:06 pm » wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The fool is trying to engage me !

Ignorance is indeed bliss  . . .  and you excel in it !
 
what separates a fool from another person ignoring the same thing? The two are allies creating a deep state of mind secret that makes a person's brain choose silence over standing one's time against everyone standing the ground they conquered with conviction to deny life in plain sight.

When people agree to never agree on anything specific, every reality covers up the same core of life evolving in plain sight until extinction event arrives.
User avatar
jack
11 Aug 2022 9:07 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
680 posts
Perception.

Imagination is a function of intelligence but it can get in your way on an IQ test, especially a timed test where your mind may become crowded with possible answers to a question a duller mind would more quickly work through.

Einstein certainly had a genius IQ, though there is no record of him having been tested, but his creative imagination put his intelligence in a unique realm of perception.
User avatar
FOS
11 Aug 2022 12:51 pm
11 Aug 2022 12:51 pm
FOS
User avatar
      
5,595 posts
Skans » 11 Aug 2022, 8:10 am » wrote: Measuring intelligence using an IQ test is arguably a type of science, but it is somewhat crude and anecdotal at best.  It is actually more like carpentry where all of the measurements are taken using sonar; i.e the ability to indirectly measure something using feedback. 

The true science of directly measuring intelligence is still beyond our capabilities because we don't understand the exact nature of intelligence.  We can't model it, we can't biochemically enhance it, or repair it or even precisely alter it.  To do that we would have to fully understand the precise inner workings of the brain down to each chemical reaction inside of it acting in sequence.  Then, we would have to devise a method of directly testing and measuring an individual's brain chemistry for performance.  The IQ test, while useful and somewhat reliable, is far from being able to directly measure mental/intellectual performance.

what makes something qualify as a 'science' is its predictive power. You may not trust IQ tests but the fact remains that they are very predictive. IQ can be correlated precisely with thousands of other things...from average income to the possibility of developing schizophrenia to the chance of dying in a car accident. And these things replicate very consistently over and over again.

whether IQ represents what you consider 'intelligence' to be is of course an open question because intelligence is a rather vague word.

but to pretend that iq doesnt measure something that matters is demonstrably false. It is 80% heritable so it must have a strong genetic component. And if you know a person's iq you can predict quite a lot about their future...and probably be correct. this may be uncomfortable for people who believe in free will, but it is what it is.
User avatar
FOS
11 Aug 2022 12:56 pm
11 Aug 2022 12:56 pm
FOS
User avatar
      
5,595 posts
Monderegal » 10 Aug 2022, 6:17 pm » wrote: Your answer was reproductive fitness. Not all societies are closely linked but are in kinship and many places practice arranged marriages. In fact, this used to be the norm in Western societies. Perhaps I invented the gun but my wife was arranged for me long before. The Darwin argument is also misplaced since people want different things in partners. At least on the human level it's not just horns and feathers.

human survival is more similar to the survival of an ant colony than say...a bear.no human can survive alone or just with their partner. We build societies and entire civilizations that are based on specialization. it is unavoidable that natural selection would influence these societies. Monogamy accents this...it increases group evolution and specialization.

arranged marriages also only accents this fact. the diverse dog breeds are also a product of 'arranged marriages'...right?

so the things you are trying to raise as issues with my world view only confirm it.
User avatar
FOS
11 Aug 2022 12:59 pm
11 Aug 2022 12:59 pm
FOS
User avatar
      
5,595 posts
SJConspirator » 11 Aug 2022, 7:53 am » wrote: there are various kinds of intelligence.  Spatial intelligence, for example can help you navigate with no map, remember where your keys are, find your way in the dark, etc.  linguistic intelligence can help you communicate a series of important points in a short time.  Different types of intelligence can save your life during different types of crises.

intelligence is the mental acumen that has utility in the real world, I.e. being super philosophical is not a useful intelligence in my view because it renders no real world benefit for survival, success, etc..

If all the different types of intelligence are combined in a meta analysis, and one scores high on all of them, that person is exceptionally intelligent

people can have different sorts of talents...but i personally do not equate talent with intelligence. i guess it just depends on how you define intelligence. I see intelligence as a single scalar...people can simply be more or less intelligent. ANd idiot savants exist...a moron might have some amazing ability at mental arithmetic, for example.

also, human beings do not survive as individuals. THey survive as members of a civilization. Philosophical thought can benefit every member of that civilization and increase their chance to survive.
User avatar
SJConspirator
11 Aug 2022 2:55 pm
User avatar
     
2,084 posts
FOS » 11 Aug 2022, 12:59 pm » wrote: people can have different sorts of talents...but i personally do not equate talent with intelligence. i guess it just depends on how you define intelligence. I see intelligence as a single scalar...people can simply be more or less intelligent. ANd idiot savants exist...a moron might have some amazing ability at mental arithmetic, for example.

also, human beings do not survive as individuals. THey survive as members of a civilization. Philosophical thought can benefit every member of that civilization and increase their chance to survive.
A common archetype is the absent minded professor, maybe similar to idiot savant.  That person makes intelligence into a kind of dual expression, where they are genius in some area but lack common sense
 
User avatar
nuckin futz
11 Aug 2022 3:16 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
5,726 posts
Neo » 10 Aug 2022, 1:27 pm » wrote: Intelligence is a capacity to learn and apply knowledge, wisdom is gained from experience. Some of the most intelligent people often seem to have blind spots, they lack wisdom in certain areas. I do believe that Intelligence unchallenged will atrophy.
Or be corrupted by ideology,as in your case.
A mind is a terrible thing to waste!
:(   :(   :(  
 
User avatar
Skans
11 Aug 2022 3:19 pm
User avatar
      
13,098 posts
FOS » 11 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm » wrote: what makes something qualify as a 'science' is its predictive power. You may not trust IQ tests but the fact remains that they are very predictive. IQ can be correlated precisely with thousands of other things...from average income to the possibility of developing schizophrenia to the chance of dying in a car accident. And these things replicate very consistently over and over again.

whether IQ represents what you consider 'intelligence' to be is of course an open question because intelligence is a rather vague word.

but to pretend that iq doesnt measure something that matters is demonstrably false. It is 80% heritable so it must have a strong genetic component. And if you know a person's iq you can predict quite a lot about their future...and probably be correct. this may be uncomfortable for people who believe in free will, but it is what it is.
I think if you read what I wrote, you would realize that I am not "pretending that IQ doesn't measure something that matters".  IQ tests are statistically valid, and yes, valid predictors of other things that do matter, I would never dispute this. What I question is whether this type of statistical analysis or statistical correlation is actually "science" or is it just another performance-based measurement.  

True science explains the "why" behind the statistical correlation or evidence, hopefully with verifiable precision.
 
1 2 3 4

Who is online

In total there are 1259 users online :: 21 registered, 15 bots, and 1223 guests
Bots: CriteoBot, Yahoo! Slurp, GPTBot, app.hypefactors.com, DuckDuckBot, proximic, semantic-visions.com, Applebot, ADmantX, linkfluence.com, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, curl/7, Googlebot
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum