Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Chilling Prediction By Nikita Khrushchev Is Nearing Fruition.
Chilling Prediction By Nikita Khrushchev Is Nearing Fruition.
By DeplorablePatriot
10 Aug 2022 3:50 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
17 posts • Page 1 of 1
10 Aug 2022 3:50 pm
If you haven't previously known his recipe for American communism, this is happening on every point. Hair raising.
Stay armed.
You Will Fall Like Over Ripe Fruit into our Hands - Bing video
Stay armed.
You Will Fall Like Over Ripe Fruit into our Hands - Bing video
10 Aug 2022 4:19 pm
The video of Sergio Khrushchev is unrelated to what you allege here. Soviet Communism was incapable of maintaining an oppressive state and simultaneously introducing computer technology. Putin has managed to turn Russia into an oppressive oligarchy supporting itself on natural resources, but Russia in 2022 is way behind the US in nearly every measurement.
The real danger is the development of connected personal computers, in the form of cellphones by tracking every action and every word of every citizen, which is what China is doing. Soviet Communism was only a threat to the US because the USSR had nukes, as do Russia, the US, the uk and several other countries.
The most serious danger is the rule of individual nations by national oligarchies, like the ones in China, Hungary, Russia, the DPRK and such, This involves the destruction of actual democracies and their replacement by oligarchies of the wealthy. That is what Bannon wants, that is what Putin wants and that is what Trump is hoping for.
The real danger is the development of connected personal computers, in the form of cellphones by tracking every action and every word of every citizen, which is what China is doing. Soviet Communism was only a threat to the US because the USSR had nukes, as do Russia, the US, the uk and several other countries.
The most serious danger is the rule of individual nations by national oligarchies, like the ones in China, Hungary, Russia, the DPRK and such, This involves the destruction of actual democracies and their replacement by oligarchies of the wealthy. That is what Bannon wants, that is what Putin wants and that is what Trump is hoping for.
10 Aug 2022 5:01 pm
You are politically blind.Xavier_Onassis » 10 Aug 2022, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ The video of Sergio Khrushchev is unrelated to what you allege here. Soviet Communism was incapable of maintaining an oppressive state and simultaneously introducing computer technology. Putin has managed to turn Russia into an oppressive oligarchy supporting itself on natural resources, but Russia in 2022 is way behind the US in nearly every measurement.
The real danger is the development of connected personal computers, in the form of cellphones by tracking every action and every word of every citizen, which is what China is doing. Soviet Communism was only a threat to the US because the USSR had nukes, as do Russia, the US, the uk and several other countries.
The most serious danger is the rule of individual nations by national oligarchies, like the ones in China, Hungary, Russia, the DPRK and such, This involves the destruction of actual democracies and their replacement by oligarchies of the wealthy. That is what Bannon wants, that is what Putin wants and that is what Trump is hoping for.
10 Aug 2022 5:28 pm
Xavier_Onassis » 10 Aug 2022, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ The video of Sergio Khrushchev is unrelated to what you allege here. Soviet Communism was incapable of maintaining an oppressive state and simultaneously introducing computer technology. Putin has managed to turn Russia into an oppressive oligarchy supporting itself on natural resources, but Russia in 2022 is way behind the US in nearly every measurement.
The real danger is the development of connected personal computers, in the form of cellphones by tracking every action and every word of every citizen, which is what China is doing. Soviet Communism was only a threat to the US because the USSR had nukes, as do Russia, the US, the uk and several other countries.
The most serious danger is the rule of individual nations by national oligarchies, like the ones in China, Hungary, Russia, the DPRK and such, This involves the destruction of actual democracies and their replacement by oligarchies of the wealthy. That is what Bannon wants, that is what Putin wants and that is what Trump is hoping for.
You're politically retarded !
Actually just retarded . . . in every sense !
10 Aug 2022 6:08 pm
Xavier_Onassis » 10 Aug 2022, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ The video of Sergio Khrushchev is unrelated to what you allege here. Soviet Communism was incapable of maintaining an oppressive state and simultaneously introducing computer technology. Putin has managed to turn Russia into an oppressive oligarchy supporting itself on natural resources, but Russia in 2022 is way behind the US in nearly every measurement.
Compare and contrast the kleptocracy he inherited to the state he runs today, fruity.
That is what your masters have done, fruitcake. And you are a good little slave.Xavier_Onassis » 10 Aug 2022, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑The real danger is the development of connected personal computers, in the form of cellphones by tracking every action and every word of every citizen, which is what China is doing. Soviet Communism was only a threat to the US because the USSR had nukes, as do Russia, the US, the uk and several other countries.
The most serious danger is the rule of individual nations by national oligarchies, like the ones in China, Hungary, Russia, the DPRK and such, This involves the destruction of actual democracies and their replacement by oligarchies of the wealthy. That is what Bannon wants, that is what Putin wants and that is what Trump is hoping for.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
10 Aug 2022 6:20 pm
10 Aug 2022 6:25 pm
10 Aug 2022 6:56 pm
I didn't know a mind can zone.
Zone out maybe... Like you seem to be most of the time.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
10 Aug 2022 8:35 pm
Hey! Jackoff, I'm 'tuned in and turned on ' all the time! get HIP!DeezerShoove » 10 Aug 2022, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't know a mind can zone.
Zone out maybe... Like you seem to be most of the time.
Your world only exists in your mind!
10 Aug 2022 9:39 pm
11 Aug 2022 4:06 am
11 Aug 2022 4:08 am
11 Aug 2022 7:20 am
Don't know about the explanation after the ".....ten seconds", but that was fun. Thanks.
11 Aug 2022 7:29 am
Xavier wants so badly to be relevant...be he just can't pull it off.
11 Aug 2022 10:27 am
Why didn't we nuke China when we could during Vietnam? We had pussies in charge! There was no reason not to completely annihilate China then.
11 Aug 2022 5:11 pm
As does yours.nuckinfutz » 10 Aug 2022, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey! Jackoff, I'm 'tuned in and turned on ' all the time! get HIP!
Your world only exists in your mind!
One big difference being that I don't consider that an insult.
You do.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
11 Aug 2022 8:59 pm
Man, that is some seriously **** up ****, right there!
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
17 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 1375 users online :: 21 registered, 16 bots, and 1338 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, Two If By Tea, Mrkelly, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buck Naked, righteous, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, *GHETTO BLASTER, FJB, MR-7, *Beekeeper, Skans, murdock, LowIQTrash, Harper Lee, nefarious101, *Huey
Bots: CriteoBot, Yahoo! Slurp, GPTBot, DuckDuckBot, Applebot, LCC, semantic-visions.com, app.hypefactors.com, linkfluence.com, proximic, ADmantX, YandexBot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot