What Did patton mean when he said we defeated the wrong enemy?

User avatar
By nuckin futz
13 Aug 2022 9:54 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2
User avatar
Xavier_Onassis
17 Aug 2022 11:15 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
4,999 posts
Hank » 16 Aug 2022, 10:02 pm » wrote: We had nukes at the end of world war 2 Russia did not. We would have mopped the floor with the red army
No, we did not.
We had TWO and dropped both of them, Fat Man and Little Boy.
 Your knowledge of history is quite poor.



 
User avatar
Warcok
17 Aug 2022 1:03 pm
User avatar
     
2,393 posts
Xavier_Onassis » 17 Aug 2022, 11:15 am » wrote: No, we did not.
We had TWO and dropped both of them, Fat Man and Little Boy.
 Your knowledge of history is quite poor.
But did Russia know we only had two?

Psy-ops, man!

Image
 
 
User avatar
Huey
17 Aug 2022 1:46 pm
User avatar
      
35,747 posts
Xavier_Onassis » 17 Aug 2022, 11:15 am » wrote:
Hank » 16 Aug 2022, 10:02 pm » wrote: We had nukes at the end of world war 2 Russia did not. We would have mopped the floor with the red army
No, we did not.
We had TWO and dropped both of them, Fat Man and Little Boy.
 Your knowledge of history is quite poor.



 

 

There were actually at least three.  If Japan did not surrender after the first two the third would have been used.

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-ar ... l?chrome=1
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
dickens
17 Aug 2022 2:05 pm
User avatar
  
195 posts
nuckinfutz » 13 Aug 2022, 9:54 pm » wrote: What Did patton mean when he said we defeated the wrong enemy?
Patton's statement was incorrect. Nazis were already defeated at Stalingrad in January 1943. So the aim of US invasion was to prevent USSR from occupying the whole of the Europe.
 
 
User avatar
Ike Bana
17 Aug 2022 2:05 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
2,427 posts
ConservativeWave » 17 Aug 2022, 2:47 am » wrote: I think it was because General Patton saw the DEMOCRAT Party as a THREAT to Democracy, and to the peace of the WORLD, JUST as much as the NAZIS were... and so, he WANTED to turn his army to face the Democrats, and WIPE them off of the FACE of the EARTH... BUT, was stopped by those in charge !!

OR... was that the Russians ??


Image
OR...are you a deranged ****. Everything is Trump politics to idiots like you.  The politics of the 1940's were nothing like the politics of today.  It didn't matter which party was in power or who was specifically running things to Patton.  He despised all politicians, regardless of party.  Patton never said, "Politicians are the lowest form of life on earth. Liberal Democrats are the lowest form of politicians."  He may have said the first part but he never said the second part.
 
User avatar
*GHETTO BLASTER
17 Aug 2022 2:11 pm
User avatar
      
17,379 posts
nuckinfutz » 13 Aug 2022, 9:54 pm » wrote: Only serious WWII historians are invited to this thread:
FOS
Cannon Pointer
Vegas
Huey
In will with hold my own opinion until the end.
IF PATTON ONLY KNEW THAT HE WAS MAKING THE WORLD SAFE FOR EFFEMINATELY RAISED PUSSIES LIKE YOU...HE WOULD HAVE SWITCHED SIDES...!!!

Image
 
User avatar
Warcok
17 Aug 2022 2:27 pm
User avatar
     
2,393 posts
IkeBana » 17 Aug 2022, 2:05 pm » wrote: OR...are you a deranged ****. Everything is Trump politics to idiots like you.  The politics of the 1940's were nothing like the politics of today.  It didn't matter which party was in power or who was specifically running things to Patton.  He despised all politicians, regardless of party.  Patton never said, "Politicians are the lowest form of life on earth. Liberal Democrats are the lowest form of politicians."  He may have said the first part but he never said the second part.

Image
 
User avatar
*GHETTO BLASTER
17 Aug 2022 2:55 pm
User avatar
      
17,379 posts
Xavier_Onassis » 17 Aug 2022, 11:15 am » wrote: No, we did not.
We had TWO and dropped both of them, Fat Man and Little Boy.
 Your knowledge of history is quite poor.
On VJ Day, the core of the third bomb was ready to go.
General Groves said he could have three more in three months.
Try educating  yourself FIRST before continuing to shoot your mouth off and making yourself look like a poorly educated Libtard  Fool..
I don't go out of my way to pound you on a daily basis with the truth..it just works out that way.
 
 
User avatar
sole
17 Aug 2022 4:40 pm
User avatar
      
26,987 posts
Huey » 17 Aug 2022, 1:46 pm » wrote: There were actually at least three.  If Japan did not surrender after the first two the third would have been used.

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-ar ... l?chrome=1
third was fired off testing wasn't it before sending the other two to be used. If I remember the argument in history at the time some scientist of that period thought it would scorch the sky and end all life in this atmosphere because the chain reaction wouldn't be limited to just the location it went off. Why it was called a doomsday device.
User avatar
Hank
17 Aug 2022 5:16 pm
User avatar
   
598 posts
Huey » 17 Aug 2022, 1:46 pm » wrote: There were actually at least three.  If Japan did not surrender after the first two the third would have been used.

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-ar ... l?chrome=1
And in what if scenarios, in case of war with the red army, we would have built three dozen more to end the war quickly 
When I lost hope I gained my freedom
1 2

Who is online

In total there are 7652 users online :: 9 registered, 14 bots, and 7629 guests
Bots: Not, proximic, ADmantX, okhttp, YandexBot, Bolt, curl/7, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, bingbot, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, Baiduspider
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search