The president is the arbiter of what is a presidential record and what is his personal property, the Supreme Court has already ruled on this.Xavier_Onassis » 30 Aug 2022, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ We all know the Trumpian fanatic that calls himself Conservative Voice. He cannot shut up about how in about three weeks every one will be cowtowing before The Orange One.
Here is what he needs to tell us:
(1) Why did Trump abscond with dozens of boxes of official documents that belonged to the government and needed to be sent to the national Archives?
(2) What was he planning to do with these? Sell them to collectors? Sell them to Putin, Xi or the love of his life, Kim Jung Un?
(3) Why did he only return SOME of these rather than ALL of them?
(4) Why did he tell his lawyers that they had returned ALL of them when there were still a lot of documents at Mar A Lago?
That is FALSE, the law says any document pertaining to the duties of the president BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE and shall be held in the NATIONAL ARCHIVES.Cedar » 30 Aug 2022, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ The president is the arbiter of what is a presidential record and what is his personal property, the Supreme Court has already ruled on this.
Life is always the total sum of ancestral positions changing population numbers forward here now and each lifetime regardless species is evolving one of a kind, so why does everyone make social narratives about rank gets privileges the governed sacrifice their biological time to keep ideas reaching fruition now?Xavier_Onassis » 30 Aug 2022, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ We all know the Trumpian fanatic that calls himself Conservative Voice. He cannot shut up about how in about three weeks every one will be cowtowing before The Orange One.
Here is what he needs to tell us:
(1) Why did Trump abscond with dozens of boxes of official documents that belonged to the government and needed to be sent to the national Archives?
(2) What was he planning to do with these? Sell them to collectors? Sell them to Putin, Xi or the love of his life, Kim Jung Un?
(3) Why did he only return SOME of these rather than ALL of them?
(4) Why did he tell his lawyers that they had returned ALL of them when there were still a lot of documents at Mar A Lago?
False.Cedar » 30 Aug 2022, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ The president is the arbiter of what is a presidential record and what is his personal property, the Supreme Court has already ruled on this.
Yea......but "hazel"Xavier_Onassis » 30 Aug 2022, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ That is FALSE, the law says any document pertaining to the duties of the president BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE and shall be held in the NATIONAL ARCHIVES.
We already have a lot of ignorance flitting about here, we don't need yours.
Fluffers don't address questions...Xavier_Onassis » 30 Aug 2022, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ We all know the Trumpian fanatic that calls himself Conservative Voice. He cannot shut up about how in about three weeks every one will be cowtowing before The Orange One.
Here is what he needs to tell us:
(1) Why did Trump abscond with dozens of boxes of official documents that belonged to the government and needed to be sent to the national Archives?
(2) What was he planning to do with these? Sell them to collectors? Sell them to Putin, Xi or the love of his life, Kim Jung Un?
(3) Why did he only return SOME of these rather than ALL of them?
(4) Why did he tell his lawyers that they had returned ALL of them when there were still a lot of documents at Mar A Lago?
questions about hypothetical results don't debate actual life taking place, but how to manage results arriving beyond the moment here.
The ignorance seems to be yours...Xavier_Onassis » 30 Aug 2022, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ That is FALSE, the law says any document pertaining to the duties of the president BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE and shall be held in the NATIONAL ARCHIVES.
We already have a lot of ignorance flitting about here, we don't need yours.
You still upset that you've been playing tug of war with the cyclops to the picture of an unknown stranger? Let it go....or you'll go blind.
I'm satisfied that the twink in question is who the caption says he is...Cedar » 30 Aug 2022, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ You still upset that you've been playing tug of war with the cyclops to the picture of an unknown stranger? Let it go....or you'll go blind.
**chuckle**
You said "satisfied" Heh Heh Heh Heh HehBlackvegetable » 30 Aug 2022, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm satisfied that the twink in question is who the caption says he is...
You apparently understand that to mean something suggestive, twinkspotter...
https://youtu.be/13OoNe51Vx8Xavier_Onassis » 30 Aug 2022, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ We all know the Trumpian fanatic that calls himself Conservative Voice. He cannot shut up about how in about three weeks every one will be cowtowing before The Orange One.
Here is what he needs to tell us:
(1) Why did Trump abscond with dozens of boxes of official documents that belonged to the government and needed to be sent to the national Archives?
(2) What was he planning to do with these? Sell them to collectors? Sell them to Putin, Xi or the love of his life, Kim Jung Un?
(3) Why did he only return SOME of these rather than ALL of them?
(4) Why did he tell his lawyers that they had returned ALL of them when there were still a lot of documents at Mar A Lago?
Blackvegetable » 30 Aug 2022, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑ You apparently understand that to mean something suggestive, twinkspotter...
WHY do you need to keep having this explained to you...?Xavier_Onassis » 30 Aug 2022, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ We all know the Trumpian fanatic that calls himself Conservative Voice. He cannot shut up about how in about three weeks every one will be cowtowing before The Orange One.
Here is what he needs to tell us:
(1) Why did Trump abscond with dozens of boxes of official documents that belonged to the government and needed to be sent to the national Archives?
(2) What was he planning to do with these? Sell them to collectors? Sell them to Putin, Xi or the love of his life, Kim Jung Un?
(3) Why did he only return SOME of these rather than ALL of them?
(4) Why did he tell his lawyers that they had returned ALL of them when there were still a lot of documents at Mar A Lago?

Xavier_Onassis » 30 Aug 2022, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ That is FALSE, the law says any document pertaining to the duties of the president BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE and shall be held in the NATIONAL ARCHIVES.
We already have a lot of ignorance flitting about here, we don't need yours.
I know you would much rather discuss that because Cedar just handed you your ***. If what he posted is to complicated for you to understand here is the condensed version:Blackvegetable » 30 Aug 2022, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑Yea......but "hazel"Xavier_Onassis » 30 Aug 2022, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ That is FALSE, the law says any document pertaining to the duties of the president BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE and shall be held in the NATIONAL ARCHIVES.
We already have a lot of ignorance flitting about here, we don't need yours.
Huey » 30 Aug 2022, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ I know you would much rather discuss that because Cedar just handed you your ***. If what he posted is to complicated for you to understand here is the condensed version:
The 10-year-old court ruling, issued by U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson, rejected arguments by a conservative watchdog group that sought access to dozens of tapes recorded by Mr. Clinton and historian Taylor Branch during his administration.
Judge Jackson ruled that the tapes belonged to Mr. Clinton, even though the discussions included a broad range of presidential matters. The court ruled that the National Archives and Records Administration had no power to “seize control of them” because Mr. Clinton had used his authority under the Presidential Records Act to declare the recordings part of his personal records.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... uld-affec/
Try to not be morans.....to the extent that there are PERSONAL documents, the filter team has already returned them....recorded by Mr. Clinton and historian Taylor Branch