Liberal Forum

Huey » 30 Aug 2022, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2022, 2:45 pm

I know you would much rather discuss that because Cedar just handed you your ***.  If what he posted is to complicated for you to understand here is the condensed version:

The 10-year-old court ruling, issued by U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson, rejected arguments by a conservative watchdog group that sought access to dozens of tapes recorded by Mr. Clinton and historian Taylor Branch during his administration.

Judge Jackson ruled that the tapes belonged to Mr. Clinton, even though the discussions included a broad range of presidential matters. The court ruled that the National Archives and Records Administration had no power to “seize control of them” because Mr. Clinton had used his authority under the Presidential Records Act to declare the recordings part of his personal records.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... uld-affec/

Xavier_Onassis » 03 Sep 2022, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 2:23 pm

So Clinton declared ownership of some tapes, that is not the case with Trump, who simply filched 40+ boxes of stuff, a lot of it top secret and declared none of it declassified nor his property before filching it. Nothing Clinton claimed was his was top secret or classified.
 Trump is in deep **** here and anyone with a brain knows it.
Cedar does not know ****.
You do not know ****.
CV, he lie low.