Except that I read the JUDGMENT - not propaganda ABOUT the judgment, weakness.Blackvegetable » 30 Aug 2022, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Only if you couldn't figure out the Wash Examiner's game.
JW sued National Archives to oblige them to force Elvis to give up material the Archives and Elvis had agreed was his.
It didn't fly.
Hey stupid! Are you even yet aware that Trump DE-CLASSIFIED ALL DOCUMENTS HE TOOK from the White House, as per HIS RIGHT AS PRESIDENT! He "stole" NOTHING, and ANYTHING he took becomes no longer "top secret" the moment Trump says it's not!Xavier_Onassis » 31 Aug 2022, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ WHY do you need to keep having this explained to you...?\\\
Trump filching government property is in NO WAY related to the price of gasoline or immigrants or any of that ****.
Trump has NO RIGHT to what he stole, especially top secret documents.
Cannonpointer » 31 Aug 2022, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ Except that I read the JUDGMENT - not propaganda ABOUT the judgment, weakness.
That is the difference between us. I go to sources and think critically. You check in with favored intermediaries and are instructed what to think and prattle.
Don't just vaguely describe the experience....Cannonpointer » 31 Aug 2022, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ Except that I read the JUDGMENT - not propaganda ABOUT the judgment, weakness.
That is the difference between us. I go to sources and think critically. You check in with favored intermediaries and are instructed what to think and prattle.
What did I get wrong, CheezyPoof?
You're a **** idiot..Zeets2 » 31 Aug 2022, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑ Hey stupid! Are you even yet aware that Trump DE-CLASSIFIED ALL DOCUMENTS HE TOOK from the White House, as per HIS RIGHT AS PRESIDENT! He "stole" NOTHING, and ANYTHING he took becomes no longer "top secret" the moment Trump says it's not!
Why do you need to keep having this explained to you?
Nor does it mean that he doesn't have every right to keep them! Or are you stupid enough to believe that the FBI can legally take his passports and his private, confidential documents that are covered under attorney/client privilege. AND YET THEY DID, OPENING UP THE FBI TO A MONSTEROUS LEGAL LAWSUIT!Blackvegetable » 31 Aug 2022, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ You're a **** idiot..
It doesn't mean he can paper his toilet wall with them.
Do you understand that?
You're a ******* ****,Zeets2 » 31 Aug 2022, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ Nor does it mean that he doesn't have every right to keep them! Or are you stupid enough to believe that the FBI can legally take his passports and his private, confidential documents that are covered under attorney/client privilege. AND YET THEY DID, OPENING UP THE FBI TO A MONSTEROUS LEGAL LAWSUIT!
Or haven't you ever read the 4th Amendment?
Do you understand THAT dickhead?
Your arguments only make sense if you believe Trump to be an illegitimate president, which you likely believe. Trump was a duly elected president of the United States so espionage and documentation classification violations are not possible by nature of the office he held. I know you don't like that but his election made actions taken against him, even actions you feel were warranted, bordering on sedition.Xavier_Onassis » 31 Aug 2022, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ WHY do you need to keep having this explained to you...?\\\
Trump filching government property is in NO WAY related to the price of gasoline or immigrants or any of that ****.
Trump has NO RIGHT to what he stole, especially top secret documents.
****!! NO search warrant permits them to take OR VIEW anything regarding attorney/client privilege OR to confiscate his passports WHEN HE HAS NEVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A CRIME AND IS NOT A FLIGHT RISK!Blackvegetable » 31 Aug 2022, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ You're a ******* ****,
There was a "Filter Team" whose job it was to sort wheat from chaff and pass the latter back to the Grifter...
That has been done.
This was a duly executed search warrant...there isn't a lot of courtesy afforded a "respondent"
When you take a shot at the king you better not miss. By my calculations your ilk have tried a dozen times revealing an impotence that viagra can't satiate.Blackvegetable » 31 Aug 2022, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ You're a ******* ****,
There was a "Filter Team" whose job it was to sort wheat from chaff and pass the latter back to the Grifter...
That has been done.
This was a duly executed search warrant...there isn't a lot of courtesy afforded a "respondent"
It isn't "Biden's", it's the FBI's...Zeets2 » 31 Aug 2022, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ ****!! NO search warrant permits them to take OR VIEW anything regarding attorney/client privilege OR to confiscate his passports WHEN HE HAS NEVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A CRIME AND IS NOT A FLIGHT RISK!
A phony Biden "filter team" HAS NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER to even LOOK at them, NOR DO THEY HAVE THE TOP SECRET CLEARENCE TO VIEW THEM AND SORT THEM OUT OR EVEN DETERMINE WHICH ONES THEY CAN'T SEE!
Now explain why Hillary didn't have HER home raided when she put Top Secret documents ON HER UNSECURED LAPTOP, then deleted and bleached over 30,000 emails THAT WERE UNDER SUBPOENA, and destroy her hard drive and cell phones by smashing them with hammers?
Same with Huma Aberdeen, Hillary's aide, who ALSO had top secret correspondence between her and Hillary on HER unsecured laptop WHICH WAS USED BY HER PERVERT HUSBAND TO SEND DICK PICTURES TO STRANGERS!
Apparently, you're as ignorant regarding the 4th Amendment as you are on virtually every other topic, possibly with the exception of your Russian basket-weaving expertise!
Zeet,NOR DO THEY HAVE THE TOP SECRET CLEARENCE TO VIEW THEM AND SORT THEM OUT OR EVEN DETERMINE WHICH ONES THEY CAN'T SEE!
Absolutely unreal.Now explain why Hillary
bordering?Neo » 31 Aug 2022, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ Your arguments only make sense if you believe Trump to be an illegitimate president, which you likely believe. Trump was a duly elected president of the United States so espionage and documentation classification violations are not possible by nature of the office he held. I know you don't like that but his election made actions taken against him, even actions you feel were warranted, bordering on sedition.
No questions, dick sucker.
That was an order, knobhound.
That's a very revealing choice of trope.Neo » 31 Aug 2022, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ When you take a shot at the king you better not miss. By my calculations your ilk have tried a dozen times revealing an impotence that viagra can't satiate.
Another disquieting metaphor.By my calculations your ilk have tried a dozen times revealing an impotence that viagra can't satiate.
Blackvegetable » 31 Aug 2022, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑You're a ******* ****,Zeets2 » 31 Aug 2022, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ Nor does it mean that he doesn't have every right to keep them! Or are you stupid enough to believe that the FBI can legally take his passports and his private, confidential documents that are covered under attorney/client privilege. AND YET THEY DID, OPENING UP THE FBI TO A MONSTEROUS LEGAL LAWSUIT!
Or haven't you ever read the 4th Amendment?
Do you understand THAT dickhead?
There was a "Filter Team" whose job it was to sort wheat from chaff and pass the latter back to the Grifter...
That has been done.
This was a duly executed search warrant...there isn't a lot of courtesy afforded a "respondent"