It's not a double blind study. And...the sample size was tiny (something that you **** are complaining about all the time, except when it's something you like), and there was no treatment adherence function to confirm that the participants were following procedure. In other words, in the real world of real science, it's ****.GHETTOBLASTER » 06 Sep 2022, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑ I don't think these researchers were getting paid by Big Pharma to release these findings.
If these findings were proven fraudulent in a law suit brought by BIG PHARMA ..imagine the harm it would do to the LITTLE PEOPLE who are posting their positive findings about ivermectin.
Ivermectin Shows Antiviral Activity Against COVID-19 and May Reduce Transmission (infectiousdiseaseadvisor.com)
TAKE YOU OWN ADVICE...GIVE IT A REST.IkeBana » 06 Sep 2022, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑ It's not a double blind study. And...the sample size was tiny (something that you **** are complaining about all the time, except when it's something you like), and there was no treatment adherence function to confirm that the participants were following procedure. In other words, in the real world of real science, it's ****.
But let's say, by some action there is some impact on the shedding of already damaged and non-functional virus remains. So **** what. Ivermectin is not an affective treatment to stop Covid-19 from making people sick or killing them. And I'm not taking a possibly toxic drug to keep myself from infecting people when I'm recovering from Covid-19...
I'M WEARING MY **** MASK.
And there's only one invitro research study done (in a **** test tube, not a human being bluto) that shows any affect on active Covid-19 virus...and it was at a dose level 25 times higher than the maxiumum non-poisonous human dose.
Give it a **** rest.
So many people believe the Earth is flat. Are you one of them?
ScottMon » 06 Sep 2022, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ So many people believe the Earth is flat. Are you one of them?
Whatever. You made a claim about the vaccine killing people but failed to prove it. I thought that was irresponsible. So I addressed it.
You never prove anything shillyScottMon » 06 Sep 2022, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ Whatever. You made a claim about the vaccine killing people but failed to prove it. I thought that was irresponsible. So I addressed it.
How well do face masks protect against COVID-19? - Mayo Clinicclevelandsteamer » 06 Sep 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑ Masks do not work.
Proven.
Take China for example. Masks required, and they still have outbreaks.
Cities are on lock down.
Take your opinions elsewhere.
that science has been proven wrong shillyScottMon » 06 Sep 2022, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ How well do face masks protect against COVID-19? - Mayo Clinic
Can face masks help slow the spread of the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Yes. Face masks combined with other preventive measures, such as getting vaccinated, frequent hand-washing and physical distancing, can help slow the spread of the virus that causes COVID-19.
I'm with you. I had to wear my mask for nearly 2 years and hated it but I did it to protect others.
I got my link. Where the da **** is yours?
ScottMon » 06 Sep 2022, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ I'm with you. I had to wear my mask for nearly 2 years and hated it but I did it to protect others.
No, I already looked it up and found the link I posted. I'm not doing your homework for you.FJB » 06 Sep 2022, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑ look it up shilly.... or just run away like you did at the other forum
keep on shillingScottMon » 06 Sep 2022, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ No, I already looked it up and found the link I posted. I'm not doing your homework for you.
It will slow the spread. It will greatly hamper the spread if everyone cooperated. But nah. "Muh Freedoms!" won out for over a year and a half.clevelandsteamer » 06 Sep 2022, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ @Ike Bana says masks will stop the spread. This is not true.
No questions, dick sucker.
This is a concession that you have absolutely failed to prove your point but don't have the balls to admit it. Link it. Last chance.
ScottMon » 06 Sep 2022, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ It will slow the spread. It will greatly hamper the spread if everyone cooperated. But nah. "Muh Freedoms!" won out for over a year and a half.
Irresponsible and worthless.