ants will inherit the earth and eventually evolve to use tools, language, technology etc..LibDave » 12 Sep 2022, 9:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Dogs, cats, rabbits and mice will fair much better as they have a shorter lifespan and require a shorter time period to train their young to survive. Insects will fair even better.
Areas where the soil is rich in calcium and potassium will also do slightly better as the plants too prefer to absorb calcium and potassium and will be less radioactive as a result.
Ooops. I accidentally reported your post instead of quoting it SJ. Sorry. Is there a way to undo a "report:"?SJConspirator » 12 Sep 2022, 11:26 pm » wrote: ↑ ants will inherit the earth and eventually evolve to use tools, language, technology etc..
ants will outlive us and master space travel in a couple million years
https://youtu.be/rERHPiYxc64
LibDave » 12 Sep 2022, 11:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Ooops. I accidentally reported your post instead of quoting it SJ. Sorry. Is there a way to undo a "report:"?
Skans » 12 Sep 2022, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ If you live inside of a city, you're screwed. Yes, in a Nuclear war, Urbanites will be incinerated. However, only those living inside of a 10 mile radius. In fact, those living just 50 miles from a large city would be completely spared and wouldn't suffer even any bad radiation effects.
So, most of Middle America would be spared. Unless you live right in a big city, there really is nothing to worry about when it comes to a nuclear war.
I'm all set with food. Once all of the Urbanites melt away, we might even grow to appreciate the after effects of a nuclear war. Just look at Chernobyl - ground zero for a nuclear holocaust, yet it is almost livable and quite beautiful. A country boy can survive!Xavier_Onassis » 12 Sep 2022, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑ If you live in Sharon Springs, or Cody, or Social Circle, or Bogalusa or Meridian or Arkadelphia, a nuclear war will be lots and lots of fun.
Until the food trains and trucks are not coming any more.
He who presses the Red Button first, wins.Neo » 12 Sep 2022, 5:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Read a few of these glowing predictions and they run contrary to everything we learned in the cold war. Nuclear war will end all human life, nuclear winter will kill billions. Recent articles seem to make global thermonuclear war as not only survivable but perhaps a better alternative than waiting for global climate catastrophe. Removing a couple billions useless eaters might even be something to celebrate. I don't buy the new reports, they seem to be selling the public on nuclear war.
Unclean water is only a problem for Urbanites. Not folks who live in rural areas - they have wells.Bob » 13 Sep 2022, 4:51 am » wrote: ↑ Already having electric grid, transportation, water and fuel pumping problems, large numbers of people die from unclean water and have serious problems when having to be out looking for food-water. Fuel for fifty mile grocery store trips is already a problem when heating, cooling and real estate tax and rent have hyper inflated.
Man takes ivermectin and lives, gets banished by feudal monarchy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0fawc73Hy8
GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Sep 2022, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ KNOWING THAT MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL ALIEN LOVING TRAITORS LIKE YOU WILL BE CONVERTED TO PETRIFIED **** WILL MORE THAN MAKE UP FOR THE INCONVENIENCE...!!!
All it takes is a few tribes here and there after the mass kill.SJConspirator » 12 Sep 2022, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑ they are selling a nuclear war because war is a cash cow and it's inevitable.
Greed and stupidity will end this species.
Perhaps Chernobyl would be the ideal place for Skans to spend the rest of his days.Skans » 13 Sep 2022, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ I'm all set with food. Once all of the Urbanites melt away, we might even grow to appreciate the after effects of a nuclear war. Just look at Chernobyl - ground zero for a nuclear holocaust, yet it is almost livable and quite beautiful. A country boy can survive!
I have heard that we don't even have to launch them.LibDave » 12 Sep 2022, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑ The larger nukes carried on ICBMs and Medium Range Strategic nukes don't have a small 10 mile blast radius. It is more like 25-30 miles. Which is a circle 60 miles across. To give you an idea Birmingham Alabama and Huntsville Alabama are 90 miles apart center to center. Birmingham is in the center of Alabama and Huntsville is at extreme Northern Alabama. If a 10-20 MTon nuke exploded directly between the two cities the blast radius would just touch the city limits of each. Outside this zone wouldn't be very nice either. Lots of debris and very high heat. Fires everywhere. Most everything burned. Radioactive fallout perhaps 45 miles from the epicenter would cause lots of problems. Thereafter, weather patterns would cause further mayhem downwind. This is 1 strategic Nuke and it would essentially take out half the state of Alabama with further problems outside the 60 mile diameter blast zone. And most don't have a clue how to deal with radioactive fallout. So 2 of these would pretty much obliterate Alabama, an average sized state.
So how many nukes are we dealing with. Well the combined blast radii of just the US nukes is enough to cover the entire land surface area of the planet Earth (not counting ocean surface) 100 times over. Russian's quite a bit more at about 150 times the entire land area of the Earth (see book of lists). China not as much but multiple times as well. And there are other nuclear capable nations, all of which can destroy the surface of the earth at least 1X over. There have been reductions so I'm not sure how up-to-date those numbers are, but you get the picture.
You can't live at Chernobyl. You can visit there for a few hours 30+ years after the meltdown. But even that is risking future health risks. If you lived there for a prolonged period of time you would have issues. And no, country boys are no more capable of surviving radioactive fallout than your average idiot.Skans » 13 Sep 2022, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ I'm all set with food. Once all of the Urbanites melt away, we might even grow to appreciate the after effects of a nuclear war. Just look at Chernobyl - ground zero for a nuclear holocaust, yet it is almost livable and quite beautiful. A country boy can survive!
It's ok. Content is fine.LibDave » 12 Sep 2022, 11:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Ooops. I accidentally reported your post instead of quoting it SJ. Sorry. Is there a way to undo a "report:"?
There is no guarantee society will still be here, tribes or otherwise. It depends on the extent. But pointless as there isn't likely to be a nuclear exchange.DeezerShoove » 13 Sep 2022, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ All it takes is a few tribes here and there after the mass kill.
Humanity will still be here. But, so what?
We won't all die even if that is your wish.
It will be a slightly more sophisticated than hunter/gatherers society.
I see a "spoils of war" sort of thing in play, too.LibDave » 13 Sep 2022, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ There is no guarantee society will still be here, tribes or otherwise. It depends on the extent. But pointless as there isn't likely to be a nuclear exchange.
The marketing being employed to make a nuclear exchange palatable is simply shocking. That indicates people are actually considering the **** around and find out option. God help us.
How many more days do you really have on this planet until your life is painful and miserable? You aren't going to live forever. So, in the grand scheme of things, what's a little Nuclear War? You do know that Mankind is just going to have to **** around and find out, don't you. Its going to happen - I saw it in the movies.Neo » 13 Sep 2022, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ The marketing being employed to make a nuclear exchange palatable is simply shocking. That indicates people are actually considering the **** around and find out option. God help us.