I am still simply hearing you support the concept of meritocracy via fair competition between individuals.Zeets2 » 11 Oct 2022, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑
The poor will ALWAYS believe that the rich are unfairly compensated in the wealth they've achieved, and need to be reigned in no matter how much damage to the economy that results in. Such a belief is rooted in envy, jealousy, and hatred, most often coming from those who have no interest in actually doing the hard work involved with those taking the monetary risks that others are willing to do. And when liberal government leaders agree with them and promise a swift and harsh correction to that status quo in order to secure their votes, such a remedy ALWAYS fails to provide what has been promised. I've watched whole industries destroyed by that governmentally-imposed damage, with never a backwards glance by those in authority to consider how or why the attempt failed.
I absolutely DO support meritocracy combined with fair competition, neither of which are the beliefs of today's liberals.FOS » 11 Oct 2022, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I am still simply hearing you support the concept of meritocracy via fair competition between individuals.
And your hypothesis here seems to contradict observable scientific reality. The rich skew towards the democratic party. The base of the gop are the poor.
At present, the Repubs are better than Dems. Just barely. Theres not much difference. Blind partisanship is lazy and stupidZeets2 » 11 Oct 2022, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I absolutely DO support meritocracy combined with fair competition, neither of which are the beliefs of today's liberals.
What has changed since the turn of the century is that liberal government now operates at the behest of the largest corporations, who control policy with their lobbying efforts (bribes) to individuals politicians who curry favor in return for their wealth. This is corruption at the highest level, and is NOT reminiscent of ANYTHING that resembles laissez-faire. It's nothing more than the fact that liberal politicians have discovered the ability to make themselves far more wealthy doing the bidding of the multinational, multi-billion dollar corporations than they ever could fighting for the poor and middle class, which include the vast majority of small businesses who receive punitive legislation against them according to the desires of those huge corporations that enforce UNFAIR competition that provide favoritism to them to stifle the growth of their competition and keep them alone at the top of the heap.
Meritocracy is merely an afterthought for a fascist government, just as it is within liberalism.
...working your gaping republicrat puppet cack
...wasn't hitler an 'individual'? ..wasn't he 'empowered', you quibbling nazi fool? [and monetary ignoramus]
Here we go again with RAINMAN pretending that he has specially privileged knowledge of the monetary system that nobody else has.....peepee » 11 Oct 2022, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ ...working your gaping republicrat puppet cacksucker about some 'illion dollar economy' when you don't even understand the hideous origin and nature of even one dollar is sjc-level stoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopid....

The 'liberals' you speak of will never believe that any competition is fair until whites are as stupid as ***.Zeets2 » 11 Oct 2022, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I absolutely DO support meritocracy combined with fair competition, neither of which are the beliefs of today's liberals.
What has changed since the turn of the century is that liberal government now operates at the behest of the largest corporations, who control policy with their lobbying efforts (bribes) to individuals politicians who curry favor in return for their wealth. This is corruption at the highest level, and is NOT reminiscent of ANYTHING that resembles laissez-faire. It's nothing more than the fact that liberal politicians have discovered the ability to make themselves far more wealthy doing the bidding of the multinational, multi-billion dollar corporations than they ever could fighting for the poor and middle class, which include the vast majority of small businesses who receive punitive legislation against them according to the desires of those huge corporations that enforce UNFAIR competition that provide favoritism to them to stifle the growth of their competition and keep them alone at the top of the heap.
Meritocracy is merely an afterthought for a fascist government, just as it is within liberalism.
...let's hear from rabbi sasquatch's biggest fan!!!GHETTOBLASTER » 11 Oct 2022, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Here we go again with RAINMAN pretending that he has specially privileged knowledge of the monetary system that nobody else has.....
...'fair competition' would entail a fair system of money issuance...a $ubject about which you are an admitted ignoramus, dumb@ss!... wordle...FOS » 11 Oct 2022, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑ The 'liberals' you speak of will never believe that any competition is fair until whites are as stupid as ***.
No, Hitler was not an individual. He was a manifestation of the will of the German people.peepee » 11 Oct 2022, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ ...wasn't hitler an 'individual'? ..wasn't he 'empowered', you quibbling nazi fool? [and monetary ignoramus]
...get monetary realism and stfu until you do, trifling quibbler...
I know how money is created and issued, fool. This isn't as obscure as you think.peepee » 11 Oct 2022, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑ ...'fair competition' would entail a fair system of money issuance...a $ubject about which you are an admitted ignoramus, dumb@ss!... wordle...
Laissez Faire will always devolve to ethic conquest.Zeets2 » 11 Oct 2022, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I absolutely DO support meritocracy combined with fair competition, neither of which are the beliefs of today's liberals.
What has changed since the turn of the century is that liberal government now operates at the behest of the largest corporations, who control policy with their lobbying efforts (bribes) to individuals politicians who curry favor in return for their wealth. This is corruption at the highest level, and is NOT reminiscent of ANYTHING that resembles laissez-faire. It's nothing more than the fact that liberal politicians have discovered the ability to make themselves far more wealthy doing the bidding of the multinational, multi-billion dollar corporations than they ever could fighting for the poor and middle class, which include the vast majority of small businesses who receive punitive legislation against them according to the desires of those huge corporations that enforce UNFAIR competition that provide favoritism to them to stifle the growth of their competition and keep them alone at the top of the heap.
Meritocracy is merely an afterthought for a fascist government, just as it is within liberalism.
YEP...YOU FOOL NOBODY BUT YOURSELFpeepee » 11 Oct 2022, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑ ...lI MUST DEFLECT FROM GHETTOBLASTER'S CHALLENGE FOR ME TO PROVIDE PROOF THAT I HAVE SPECIALLY PRIVILEGED INFORMATION THAT NOBODY ELSE HAS...!!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
Nonsense. The differences are both huge and obvious to anyone who hasn't been asleep for the past 14 years.SJConspirator » 11 Oct 2022, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ At present, the Repubs are better than Dems. Just barely. Theres not much difference. Blind partisanship is lazy and stupid
FOS » 11 Oct 2022, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I know how money is created and issued, fool. This isn't as obscure as you think.
Marx was a jew, lol. I think you would find that sj is not really a marxist, if you were intellectually openZeets2 » 11 Oct 2022, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Nonsense. The differences are both huge and obvious to anyone who hasn't been asleep for the past 14 years.
If you don't see how similar the Obama and Biden administrations are to each other and how they are both VASTLY different than the Republican vision, than you're simply not being objective. Trump was a 180 degree about-face from where Obama led us, and Biden did a full 180 back to what Obama (who is STILL in charge) had been working towards; a socialist government more in tune with what most of Europe has become than what our Founding Fathers had envisioned.
And you're a fool if you believe that acknowledging those extreme differences is nothing more than blind partisanship.
I believe that you find them only slightly different because you still center your allegiance around your own Marxist heroes, and anything else lies in the same bucket of deplorables you use.
...nothing but 'ismFOS » 11 Oct 2022, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Marx was a jew, lol. I think you would find that sj is not really a marxist, if you were intellectually open
Not at all. Hitler was a leader of the German people. This means he had to abandon his individual wants. The greatest sacrifice.peepee » 11 Oct 2022, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
...are you counting his multiple personalities or something, you gd fool?![]()
I know. They create money and charge interest on that created money. Thus the entire monetary system works off debt to the money creators. Everyone knows this **** dude. You need to advance beyond this point.peepee » 11 Oct 2022, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
...never heard you explain it...you never talk about it...you know $hit... wordle...
...post YOUR best, you gd phony..[and monetary ignoramus]![]()
![]()
![]()
[nothing coming from this ^^^ gd fool]