Liberal Forum

@Vegas  is back from his Vision Quest to resume his tedious narcissism. Incapable of productive contribution, he demands that everyone bear witness to his pouting, and that he be afforded exemption from forum rules to facilitate his tantrums.

I challenge this piece of crap to post something, ANYTHING, he has written which casts even a hint of a shadow of a doubt on the certainty that he's a moron.


Until that Coward walks the walk, I will post some highlights from his archives....

If any of his wingidiots want to speak on his behalf, feel free...

But if you fail to defend it against a challenge, it's off to PG..
 

Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump. 

if your 3 year old bleated something like this, you'd drown it and divorce its mom....on the grounds of Indisputable Infidelity. 

viewtopic.php?p=2129299#p2129299

i just came back to druk post  beaus i fely li8ke it. I see that yu leftwingers ar still a bunch of hypocritical scumbaugs

My awakening is simple with no real profoundness: "To hell with online communities; they are nothing more than silhouette of reality, leaving real life waiting for you to partake in. With that said, nice knowing you all, though we never really knew each other, life is far more important than here or any other online community. I'm out. Adios!

What an asshole.

Can @Vegas  not locate a single of his vague traces of intelligent thought ?

ehhhhhh...sometimes I just like triggering the left for no reason. The mere sight of his name is enough. 

TDS in 3...2...1....Go!

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2022, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2022, 12:19 pm

@Vegas  is back from his Vision Quest to resume his tedious narcissism. Incapable of productive contribution, he demands that everyone bear witness to his pouting, and that he be afforded exemption from forum rules to facilitate his tantrums.

I challenge this piece of crap to post something, ANYTHING, he has written which casts even a hint of a shadow of a doubt on the certainty that he's a moron.

Until that Coward walks the walk, I will post some highlights from his archives....

If any of his wingidiots want to speak on his behalf, feel free...

But if you fail to defend it against a challenge, it's off to PG..

@Vegas   posted a topic: " Doesn't the B in LGBQT imply that there are only 2 genders?".  This is an astute observation contained in a very concise and succinct question.   Unless he stole this from someone else, I'd say this catapults him well beyond the IQ of a moron, which is 50-69. The question demonstrates:

• Vegas can write a question, complete with subject and predicate
• Vegas uses capitals, contractions and punctuation correctly
• It shows that Vegas has a firm grasp of acronyms and how to correctly use them in a sentence
• It also demonstrates that Vegas understands the word "Bisexual" and the inference that "Bi" grammatically means "two".
• Vegas also makes use of a self-contradiction taken for granted by LGBQT and gender agitators.

According to charts relating IQ to real life functioning, this topic sentence alone places Vegas's IQ within 100 - 139, which is Average to High Gifted.  https://paulcooijmans.com/intelligence/iq_ranges.html
 
 
 

It's sad that I even have to ask, but let's be honest, the left really is this stupid. Oregon wants to put tampons in the men's room. 

I know, right?

Skans » 17 Oct 2022, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2022, 12:57 pm

@Vegas   posted a topic: " Doesn't the B in LGBQT imply that there are only 2 genders?".  This is an astute observation contained in a very concise and succinct question.   Unless he stole this from someone else, I'd say this catapults him well beyond the IQ of a moron, which is 50-69. The question demonstrates:

• Vegas can write a question, complete with subject and predicate
• Vegas uses capitals, contractions and punctuation correctly
• It shows that Vegas has a firm grasp of acronyms and how to correctly use them in a sentence
• It also demonstrates that Vegas understands the word "Bisexual" and the inference that "Bi" grammatically means "two".
• Vegas also makes use of a self-contradiction taken for granted by LGBQT and gender agitators.

According to charts relating IQ to real life functioning, this topic sentence alone places Vegas's IQ within 100 - 139, which is Average to High Gifted.  https://paulcooijmans.com/intelligence/iq_ranges.html

No...it doesn't...

Bi-Sexial is a label.

Words do not define scientific ideas, they describe them. Grammar is not determinant.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2022, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2022, 12:22 pm

Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump. 

if your 3 year old bleated something like this, you'd drown it and divorce its mom....on the grounds of Indisputable Infidelity.

...you would drown a 3 year old for saying this?

an interesting confession. 

Anyway I don't see how this suggests moron iq. I just do not get it. He apparently doesn't share your preference for news sourcesso.but neither does christopher langan who has the highest measured iq for any man in the usa. 
 

FOS » 17 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm

...you would drown a 3 year old for saying this?

an interesting confession. 

Anyway I don't see how this suggests moron iq. I just do not get it. He apparently doesn't share your preference for news sourcesso.but neither does christopher langan who has the highest measured iq for any man in the usa.

That's not what he's saying, CC.


 

Skans » 17 Oct 2022, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2022, 12:57 pm

@Vegas   posted a topic: " Doesn't the B in LGBQT imply that there are only 2 genders?".  This is an astute observation contained in a very concise and succinct question.   Unless he stole this from someone else, I'd say this catapults him well beyond the IQ of a moron, which is 50-69. The question demonstrates:

• Vegas can write a question, complete with subject and predicate
• Vegas uses capitals, contractions and punctuation correctly
• It shows that Vegas has a firm grasp of acronyms and how to correctly use them in a sentence
• It also demonstrates that Vegas understands the word "Bisexual" and the inference that "Bi" grammatically means "two".
• Vegas also makes use of a self-contradiction taken for granted by LGBQT and gender agitators.

According to charts relating IQ to real life functioning, this topic sentence alone places Vegas's IQ within 100 - 139, which is Average to High Gifted.  https://paulcooijmans.com/intelligence/iq_ranges.html

I would also add that this is a **** derivative of @Cannonpointer  's **** argument, which has been vaporized.

clevelandsteamer » 17 Oct 2022, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2022, 3:09 pm

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2022, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2022, 2:56 pm

No...it doesn't...

Bi-Sexial is a label.

Words do not define scientific ideas, they describe them. Grammar is not determinant.

What is "Bi-Sexial" ?

A typo 
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2022, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2022, 2:56 pm

No...it doesn't...  What?  No...it doesn't what?

Bi-Sexial is a label.  No, it is not just a label.  It is an adjective which means "Of or relating to both sexes", which bolsters my premise in support of Vegas' post demonstrating that he is not a moron.

Words do not define scientific ideas.  Scientific ideas are mostly described in words; occasionally supplemented with Feynman diagrams, graphs and/or mathematics only where appropriate. 

Grammar is not determinant.  A proper IQ test will have a section that tests your ability to read and write, and will grade you positively the more advanced you are in those fields. Therefore, generally and statistically speaking, people with a higher IQ score will have a more advanced ability to articulate themselves through verbal and written communications.
 

I have refuted each and every one of your assertions, except for the first one which is unintelligible.  Vegas is not a moran and I have proved this to you in the manner you requested in your OP.  
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2022, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2022, 3:00 pm

I would also add that this is a **** derivative of @Cannonpointer  's **** argument, which has been vaporized.

I have examined your topic and thread.  @Cannonpointer  does not have any response posted anywhere in your thread.  Therefore, my response (one of the first responses, by the way) cannot be a derivative of Cannonpointer's argument.

Now, if you removed his argument, then this is on you and your cross to bear.  Please do not reference the posts/arguments of others which you have chosen to remove in responding to my assertions.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2022, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2022, 2:58 pm

That's not what he's saying, CC.

Oh boy. A mystery. I love mysteries. 

Pray tell.. what do you think he is saying?

Or will i have to answer a riddle first before you grace me with your divine wisdom?
 
 

Skans » 17 Oct 2022, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2022, 3:19 pm

I have examined your topic and thread.  @Cannonpointer  does not have any response posted anywhere in your thread.  Therefore, my response (one of the first responses, by the way) cannot be a derivative of Cannonpointer's argument.

Now, if you removed his argument, then this is on you and your cross to bear.  Please do not reference the posts/arguments of others which you have chosen to remove in responding to my assertions.

Give it a rest..

Cannonpointer insists that because his dictionary defines gender/sex in some manner, Science must oblige.

 

Skans » 17 Oct 2022, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2022, 3:13 pm

I have refuted each and every one of your assertions, except for the first one which is unintelligible.  Vegas is not a moran and I have proved this to you in the manner you requested in your OP.

This is tedious, Skans..

Is THIS Vegas' question?

Doesn't the B in LGBQT imply that there are only 2 genders?"

No...it doesn't. 


Nod.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2022, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2022, 4:06 pm

Give it a rest..

Cannonpointer insists that because his dictionary defines gender/sex in some manner, Science must oblige.

I have already dispelled your reference to Cannonpointer and any further discussion concerning him is ignoratio elenchi.  This debate concerns Vegas, and his IQ as demonstrated by any one of his posts.

Strike two.
 

Skans » 17 Oct 2022, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2022, 3:13 pm

I have refuted each and every one of your assertions, except for the first one which is unintelligible.  Vegas is not a moran and I have proved this to you in the manner you requested in your OP.

No, it is not just a label.  It is an adjective which means "Of or relating to both sexes", which bolsters my 

It is a label describing those who don't distinguish between male and female with respect to what attracts them.

It does NOT determine the aggregate number of "genders".

Words do not define scientific ideas.  Scientific ideas are mostly described in words

so words don't define, they describe, Nature.

Grammar is not determinant.  A proper IQ test will have a section that tests your

Grammar does not determine SCIENCE, brick.

Skans » 17 Oct 2022, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2022, 4:13 pm

I have already dispelled your reference to Cannonpointer and any further discussion concerning him is ignoratio elenchi.  This debate concerns Vegas, and his IQ as demonstrated by any one of his posts.

Strike two.

 Not because you say so.

It is, as I have pointed out, a **** derivative of a **** original.