jack » 03 Nov 2022, 6:39 pm » wrote: ↑ that was historical, nothing racist about it. Witchcraft wasn’t all of it. Herbalists
played a role and there was rudimentary surgery along with “charms”, but witchcraft was
popular.
what humans learn torturing people that won't comply with their beliefs life exceeds time evolving as existing specifically here in genetic displacement now to endure body alterations without dying.jack » 03 Nov 2022, 6:39 pm » wrote: ↑ that was historical, nothing racist about it. Witchcraft wasn’t all of it. Herbalists
played a role and there was rudimentary surgery along with “charms”, but witchcraft was
popular.
Well, I know its more than 10%. What you are saying is that only 10% of the people between the ages of 10 - 18 were the ones to do drugs, skip school, game for huge parts of the day, f-around and not work their asses off for their own futures. Probably more like 40% were like that.SJConspirator » 03 Nov 2022, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑ I know there is a percentage of humans who are just garbage and will never succeed, and deserve nothing more than refuse from dumpsters to subsist on.
The difference between us is scale. I think the percentage is around 10%, you think it's 90%
FOS » 01 Nov 2022, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ Dnc politicians and voters like to sell us this line that they fight for the little guy and want to prevent exploitation. I guess that dnc voters like to just hear that rhetoric because it makes them feel warm and fuzzy inside.
But because of the contradictions within dnc programming, it is impossible that this could ever occur.
The only revolution in the past few centuries that was good for the 'common man' was fascism. Communism totally failed at its promises because it simply destroyed national industry and replaced it with international elements, and relied far too much on the goodwill of party leaders.
The 'new deal' of fdr was a very fascist collection of policies...and relieved praise from the nazis for its syndicalism and make work programs. Buy it did not do nearly enough (as huey long kept saying) and it seemed to only exist in order to stave off a communist revolution.
A big reason for this is because it failed to address the problem of rent seeking. The REAL cause of wealth inequality in the usa is based on the fact that people can like make a million dollars a day by simply possessing abstract numbers in Wallstreet. It actually has nothing to do with their 'paycheck' and dnc voters seem incapable of figuring out. The reason that many billionaires pay no income tax is because their PAYCHECK is actually quite small...and retards like AOC fans cant seem to understand that money can be may in ways other than via paycheck.
The nazis remedied this with very strict controls over banksand land speculation...and having no stock market at all. They minimized international elements in their economy. And their economy actually had a boom because they were free from the exploitation of international finance.
Also quite telling is stuff like...Amazon explicitly stating that workforce diversity prevents worker collectivizing, and that is a good thing. Fascists will look at this and aay workforce diversity prevents worker collectivizing, and thats a bad thing. And then the dnc supporters will reel in horror at the fascists and cry out "that's racism!".
What is the average DNC voter today? They love Amazon. They love Google. They love Goldman Sachs. They love the fbi. They hate the 'rednecks' working blue collar jobs because they are uneducated and racist.
The Republicans like to pretend the dnc is communist but no the dnc are just shills for the moniesd elite.
there is only one GENUINE movement for the common man, and that is fascism
Right, but often they were called witches and sometimes did die for it, as mandated under the sorcery of the Church.FOS » 03 Nov 2022, 7:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I mean I think you are talking about the 'wise men' and 'wise women' who were often pagan, knew some amount about medicine (dunno why that correlation existed), and often treated the peasant class. They would not actually be called witches cause witches had to die. Sure they knew a lot about local plants and what their medical uses were. It wasn't totally fake either there were tangible results
These are man bites dog sorts of stories. 99% of the time such people were just left alone. I think pop history likes to play up how terrible and brutal the middle ages were in an attempt to conceal how dysfunctional modern society has becomejack » 04 Nov 2022, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑ Right, but often they were called witches and sometimes did die for it, as mandated under the sorcery of the Church.
https://liviecampbell.medium.com/when-w ... 6e42ce2610
A question for you:FOS » 01 Nov 2022, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ Dnc politicians and voters like to sell us this line that they fight for the little guy and want to prevent exploitation. I guess that dnc voters like to just hear that rhetoric because it makes them feel warm and fuzzy inside.
But because of the contradictions within dnc programming, it is impossible that this could ever occur.
The only revolution in the past few centuries that was good for the 'common man' was fascism. Communism totally failed at its promises because it simply destroyed national industry and replaced it with international elements, and relied far too much on the goodwill of party leaders.
The 'new deal' of fdr was a very fascist collection of policies...and relieved praise from the nazis for its syndicalism and make work programs. Buy it did not do nearly enough (as huey long kept saying) and it seemed to only exist in order to stave off a communist revolution.
A big reason for this is because it failed to address the problem of rent seeking. The REAL cause of wealth inequality in the usa is based on the fact that people can like make a million dollars a day by simply possessing abstract numbers in Wallstreet. It actually has nothing to do with their 'paycheck' and dnc voters seem incapable of figuring out. The reason that many billionaires pay no income tax is because their PAYCHECK is actually quite small...and retards like AOC fans cant seem to understand that money can be may in ways other than via paycheck.
The nazis remedied this with very strict controls over banks and land speculation...and having no stock market at all. They minimized international elements in their economy. And their economy actually had a boom because they were free from the exploitation of international finance.
Also quite telling is stuff like...Amazon explicitly stating that workforce diversity prevents worker collectivizing, and that is a good thing. Fascists will look at this and say workforce diversity prevents worker collectivizing, and thats a bad thing. And then the dnc supporters will reel in horror at the fascists and cry out "that's racism!".
What is the average DNC voter today? They love Amazon. They love Google. They love Goldman Sachs. They love the fbi. They hate the 'rednecks' working blue collar jobs because they are uneducated and racist.
The Republicans like to pretend the dnc is communist but no the dnc are just shills for the monied elite.
there is only one GENUINE movement for the common man, and that is fascism
instinctive honesty by each evolved fertilized cell being unique brain of each added ancestor changing population forward only occupying space as ancestrally present.Deezer Shoove » 04 Nov 2022, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ A question for you:
One of the text book teachings of American Government is that we have a constitutionally limited democracy.
A hybrid republic/democracy, if you will.
This is meant to limit the "bad" aspects of a pure democracy or a pure republic.
With this in mind, with fascism's bad reputation, what could be done to limit the "bad" aspects of fascism?
Benito didn't exactly give it the historic boost it apparently needs to get popular.
I believe that human intuition is very fallible. The truth is often very counterintuitive. I greatly value empiricism and I try to approach things scientifically rather than trusting baseless assumptions about how things SHOULD work.DeezerShoove » 04 Nov 2022, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ A question for you:
One of the text book teachings of American Government is that we have a constitutionally limited democracy.
A hybrid republic/democracy, if you will.
This is meant to limit the "bad" aspects of a pure democracy or a pure republic.
With this in mind, with fascism's bad reputation, what could be done to limit the "bad" aspects of fascism?
Benito didn't exactly give it the historic boost it apparently needs to get popular.
So, the Jews that WERE sent to camps probably found that to be unpopular. Even the odd Jew married to a German probably found that her entire family being sent off was not too thrilled with that happening.FOS » 04 Nov 2022, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ I believe that human intuition is very fallible. The truth is often very counterintuitive. I greatly value empiricism and I try to approach things scientifically rather than trusting baseless assumptions about how things SHOULD work.
And if you do some homework I think you will find that policy changes in the usa have NEVER been popular. Never. The vast majority of citizens were opposed to say...racial integration. the vast majority of citizens were opposed to entering ww1 and ww2. Countless other examples of the usa doing the opposite of what is popular based on polling.
Whatever the 'common wisdom' is about how thr usa is SUPPOSED to work...if you look at the actual data of the popularity of what the state imposes, we work like a tyranny.
And it was the exact opposite in nazi Germany. If a policy was unpopular with the people, it was repealed. That occurred with the child euthanasia program, for example. Jews who had married a German were not sent to camps because that was unpopular among the people. And many other examples.
You can Marvel and wonder HOW it is the case that the usa is oppressive and nazi germany was not. Maybe it doesn't make sense to you. But the data is in. If you value empirical knowledge it is impossible to deny.
It is less of an error...at least from a practical perspective...to anger a minority than to anger the majority.DeezerShoove » 04 Nov 2022, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ So, the Jews that WERE sent to camps probably found that to be unpopular. Even the odd Jew married to a German probably found that her entire family being sent off was not too thrilled with that happening.
Those people had to be ignored for that to continue to occur against their wishes.
This one one of those "bad" aspects of fascism to which I alluded:
A majority trundling over a minority as though they weren't worthy of consideration.
The very reason we are supposedly governed by a hybrid republic/democracy. To mitigate that.
So, again, what could be put in place to mitigate the "bad" aspects of fascism? Is it even possible?
Are you convinced human intuition is intellectual after birth or instinctive since conceived? they are two separate and completely different energy flows. Like comparing dawn to dusk transitions, summer and winter solstices simultaneously taking place on the same planet.FOS » 04 Nov 2022, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ I believe that human intuition is very fallible. The truth is often very counterintuitive. I greatly value empiricism and I try to approach things scientifically rather than trusting baseless assumptions about how things SHOULD work.
You are speaking to my experience with neighbors over the years.FOS » 04 Nov 2022, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑ It is less of an error...at least from a practical perspective...to anger a minority than to anger the majority.
It is a basic fact about politics thst you cannot make everyone happy. Imo it is ethically superior to cater to the majority than to some minority.
The nazis believes thst Jewish power was fundamentally incompatible with German interests. The differences were irreconcilable. Therefore jews simply had to leave Germany.
this is something that jas happened to jews a LOT...and under absolutely every political system. Monarchs and liberals and communists and theocratic have all exiled people of the Jewish race.
Perhaps thr issue isn't with a political system but with the actual behavior of jews, lol. That seems like the most parsimonious expanation looking at the data.
I bet you convinced yourself that was deep thoughts and never went beyond intellectually hyperbole. which pattern?Deezer Shoove » 04 Nov 2022, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ You are speaking to my experience with neighbors over the years.
More than once I have had the pleasure of greeting new people next door. Who hasn't?
Without a doubt the most predictable clue they can put out is a quick history about their move.
The ones that claim to move because they were surrounded by assholes must be in a certain gene pool.
Saying, "It's refreshing to be in a new place" only pops up more red flags.
Within six months to a year everyone hates them because they basically suck as neighbors/people.
Moral: You can't escape yourself. The pattern exists for a reason.
The asshole convinced me of his assholeness.omh » 04 Nov 2022, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ I bet you convinced yourself that was deep thoughts and never went beyond intellectually hyperbole. which pattern?
actually equally timed apart when conceived to decomposed or believing anything else is possible cradle to grave
oral cavity is a multifunctional orifice, the rectum isn't naturally more than one.Deezer Shoove » 04 Nov 2022, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ The asshole convinced me of his assholeness.
Shirley, you have met them before.
So ya gotta kiss a little *** once in a while.omh » 04 Nov 2022, 8:43 pm » wrote: ↑ oral cavity is a multifunctional orifice, the rectum isn't naturally more than one.
Now if any body doesn't have one, there wouldn't be a species of multiple generations without one.
Second, social collective opinions are lack of admitting understanding more than claimed to believe possible to the point everyone actually knows what isn't possible silencing anyone admitting what isn't.
so yes I have met assholeness in family, among friends, anywhere I go, any people visiting. I have to tolerate deniers, but deniers have moral ground, legal precedence, ethical protocol of we say so telling me I have no say except I obey the will of the people never accepting life in natural state of being eternally separated in genetic order of occupying space now.
DeezerShoove » 04 Nov 2022, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ You are speaking to my experience with neighbors over the years.
More than once I have had the pleasure of greeting new people next door. Who hasn't?
Without a doubt the most predictable clue they can put out is a quick history about their move.
The ones that claim to move because they were surrounded by assholes must be in a certain gene pool.
Saying, "It's refreshing to be in a new place" only pops up more red flags.
Within six months to a year everyone hates them because they basically suck as neighbors/people.
Moral: You can't escape yourself. The pattern exists for a reason.