Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 07 Nov 2022, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 10:24 am

"Security" is why Il Duce invaded Abbisynia.

Blackvegetable » 07 Nov 2022, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 11:05 am

The reason Putin is at war is because he wants to expand Russia....further into Ukraine.

It has NOTHING to do with NATO.

Cannonpointer » 07 Nov 2022, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 11:19 am

It's why nato bombed rush hour commuter traffic in Serbia, as well, fruitcake.

Next.

Cannonpointer » 07 Nov 2022, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 11:17 am

Your only qualification is a midwit's worship of the new york times, fruitcake.

Having been walked through Dostoyevsky by a world weary professor who despised you isn't a qualification.

Your only qualification is a midwit's worship of the new york times, fruitcake.

Having been walked through Dostoyevsky

Cannonpointer » 07 Nov 2022, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 11:12 am

The NYT? SERIOUSLY?            

On April 15, the Biden administration acknowledged there was no evidence that Russia ever offered bounties on American troops in Afghanistan, walking back a report that wounded former President Donald Trump in the run-up to the 2020 election. 
 
Four days later, the Washington, DC, medical examiner revealed that Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick had not been murdered by rampaging Trump supporters during the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill riot, as reports had claimed, but had died of natural causes.  Both stories were based on anonymous, unidentifiable sources, but had become deeply enmeshed in the public consciousness. Both confirmed the assumptions of the nation’s left-leaning media and academic elite, while damaging their political enemies. 

 And both were driven by The New York Times, where malicious misreporting has been the practice for a century, argues journalist and media commentator Ashley Rindsberg. “My research churned up not mere errors or inaccuracies but whole-cloth falsehoods,” Rindsberg writes in “The Gray Lady Winked” (Midnight Oil), out now, which examines how the nation’s premier media outlet manipulates what we think is the news. 

 The “fabrications and distortions” he found in the Times’ coverage of major stories from Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Russia to Vietnam and the Iraq War “were never the product of simple error,” Rindsberg contends. 

 “Rather, they were the byproduct of a particular kind of system, a truth-producing machine” constructed to twist facts into a pattern of the Times’ own choosing, he says. Rindsberg argues that Times reporters have followed the same playbook since the 1920s. 

 Star reporters cite fuzzily identified sources and make sweeping assertions to support a narrative aligned with the corporate whims, economic needs and political preferences of the patriarchal Ochs-Sulzberger family, which has helmed the operation since 1896, he writes. The chosen narrative, reinforced from multiple angles, is entrenched through a network of stories over time. 

https://nypost.com/2021/05/08/how-the-n ... narrative/

The NYT? SERIOUSLY?                  

Blackvegetable » 07 Nov 2022, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 11:37 am

proceeds to cite the NYPost.

Huey » 07 Nov 2022, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 11:39 am

Who was correct in those instances.

Blackvegetable » 07 Nov 2022, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 11:42 am

What reason do you have to believe the NYT isn't right on this one?

Thicker than ****.

Huey » 07 Nov 2022, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 11:44 am

And look who showed up:

Blackvegetable » 07 Nov 2022, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 11:45 am

Of course...

Let's try..

"Make a case......derp."

Warcok » 07 Nov 2022, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 10:53 am

Only 1 more day, boys! And The child molesters (dimocrats) lose their Monopoly in DC

Huey » 07 Nov 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 11:48 am

Following your example when you attack the source.  And my case is already made.  They have a pretty good track record.  Case closed.  Your turn.

Blackvegetable » 07 Nov 2022, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 11:52 am

Oh, "Because Blackvegetable, the Puppet Master.....", again...

Blackvegetable » 07 Nov 2022, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 11:52 am

Oh, "Because Blackvegetable, the Puppet Master.....", again...

Huey » 07 Nov 2022, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 11:57 am

Once again your lack of comprehension skills is present:

And my case is already made.  They have a pretty good track record.  Case closed.  Your turn.

You should have kept reading.

Blackvegetable » 07 Nov 2022, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 12:01 pm

No...there's still no reason to keep reading...

None whatsoever.

Huey » 07 Nov 2022, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 12:03 pm

Well, that’s on you.  You lose.

Katsaridaphobia » 07 Nov 2022, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 12:08 pm

@Huey  

Daddys Princess knows his boundaries with me.

Blackvegetable » 07 Nov 2022, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 8:12 am

Known loosely as the Mariupol plan, after the strategically vital port city, it called for the creation of an autonomous republic in Ukraine’s east, giving Putin effective control of the country’s industrial heartland, where Kremlin-armed, -funded and -directed “separatists” were waging a two-year-old shadow war that had left nearly 10,000 dead. The new republic’s leader would be none other than Yanukovych. The trade-off: “peace” for a broken and subservient Ukraine.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/02/maga ... e-war.html

Noooooo....NATO......Nazis...Ukraine is not a country!

**** morons.

@Cannonpointer  

@SJConspirator  

@Neo

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

omh » 07 Nov 2022, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 11:52 am

rhetorical question, what owns constitutional human rights? Institutional monopolizing of training brains of each added replacement the art of time management outside navigating life as eternally separated in their own biological displacement or ancestors that never comprehend how life became them specifically adapting to the moment in series parallel time occupying space now?

there is that intellectual property thing, trademarks, patents, copyrights every reality is assembled around that established equity between equally timed part generations left moving population forward genetically here.