Poor Elon...No Twitter App in the Apple App Store?

User avatar
By Ike Bana
29 Nov 2022 7:44 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2 3 4 5 6
User avatar
sole
29 Nov 2022 2:24 pm
User avatar
      
27,004 posts
Ike Bana » 29 Nov 2022, 12:28 pm » wrote: Just like it will reach your lame ***...or do you think you're special?  Of course you think you're special...extra special, I'll bet.
 
Where is it I say I am special when I explain how I am equally created to inhabiting space specifically here for the time I get within my skin arrived a fertilized cell until a decomposed corpse after I die.

Evolving isn't a theory, it is living in the moment one of a kind existing in series parallel displacement same time separate ancestry..
User avatar
Vegas
29 Nov 2022 3:26 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,775 posts
I still can't see why Elon didn't create his own platform instead of spending 44 billion on a giant **** hole. He is talented in creating profitable businesses. It just seems that it would have made more sense. 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
User avatar
Ike Bana
29 Nov 2022 3:52 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
2,427 posts
Skans » 29 Nov 2022, 3:09 pm » wrote: For anti-competitive practices. 
What anti-competitive practices?  Apple and Twitter aren't competitors, nor are Microsoft and Twitter. They are in completely different businesses.

Musk simply doesn't want to pay the 15% to 30% fees that both charge when Twitter users make purchases on Twitter through the apps.  And Apple and MS don't want the grief when racist assholes like you post your sick, offensive **** using apps from their stores.
 
User avatar
Skans
29 Nov 2022 3:56 pm
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
IkeBana » 29 Nov 2022, 4:52 pm » wrote: What anti-competitive practices?  Apple and Twitter aren't competitors, nor are Microsoft and Twitter. They are in completely different businesses.

Musk simply doesn't want to pay the 15% to 30% fees that both charge when Twitter users make purchases on Twitter through the apps.  And Apple and MS don't want the grief when racist assholes like you post your sick, offensive **** using apps from their stores.
Sure they are.  They are all in the business of making money off of apps.   Twitter is an app
 
User avatar
Skans
29 Nov 2022 4:01 pm
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
IkeBana » 29 Nov 2022, 4:52 pm » wrote: What anti-competitive practices?  Apple and Twitter aren't competitors, nor are Microsoft and Twitter. They are in completely different businesses.

  And Apple and MS don't want the grief when racist assholes like you post your sick, offensive **** using apps from their stores.
 
Yeah - - THAT anti competitive practice!
 
User avatar
Ike Bana
29 Nov 2022 4:25 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
2,427 posts
Skans » 29 Nov 2022, 4:56 pm » wrote: Sure they are.  They are all in the business of making money off of apps.   Twitter is an app
You don't need a **** app to use Twitter, Twitter makes money on members who never went near an app.  Twitter is not a competitor of either company.  Your anti-competition complaint would be laughed out of court.
 
User avatar
Skans
29 Nov 2022 5:24 pm
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
IkeBana » 29 Nov 2022, 5:25 pm » wrote: You don't need a **** app to use Twitter, Twitter makes money on members who never went near an app.  Twitter is not a competitor of either company.  Your anti-competition complaint would be laughed out of court.
We'll see.  I'll verifythis later.
 
User avatar
Ike Bana
30 Nov 2022 7:16 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
2,427 posts
nefarious101 » 29 Nov 2022, 1:52 pm » wrote: can he tell you to knock off the *** **** you do?...or to stop dressing like a 13 year old girl?....or stop peeing in the ladies room when you aren't a female

yep....you're for censorship of the other guy...just not yourself
yep...you're a troll
 
User avatar
sole
30 Nov 2022 7:19 am
User avatar
      
27,004 posts
Ike Bana » 30 Nov 2022, 8:16 am » wrote: yep...you're a troll
 
You are a self anointed social consensus typecast role model that never accepted why you exist in real time. Pretend away.
User avatar
FOS
30 Nov 2022 7:25 am
FOS
User avatar
      
5,595 posts
Skans » 29 Nov 2022, 6:24 pm » wrote: We'll see.  I'll verifythis later.

it isn't a competition issue...but it is a free speech issue.
User avatar
Ike Bana
30 Nov 2022 7:25 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
2,427 posts
Skans » 29 Nov 2022, 6:24 pm » wrote: We'll see.  I'll verifythis later.
We will see alright.  The government is not going to **** with Apple and Microsoft on this one.  Musk is a megalomaniac who is testing the system to see just how much of his excessive weight he can throw around.  He failed in his frantic attempt to weasel out of the bad deal he made for himself when he signed the contract to buy Twitter.  The only people who haven't had a **** gut full of Musk at this point are you MAGA/Q-ANON conspiracy theory headcases. 

The management at Twitter decided they were tired of Trump's lying-fatass **** and kicked him off.  So along comes Elon Musk, who like Trump doesn't give a **** in your MAGA hat for anybody's rights...like Trump he only cares about himself and his fragile micro-thinskinned ego.  Just the kind of narcissistic jagoff you conjobs go for.
 
User avatar
Ike Bana
30 Nov 2022 7:29 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
2,427 posts
FOS » 30 Nov 2022, 8:25 am » wrote: it isn't a competition issue...but it is a free speech issue.
It isn't a free speech issue.  It's a private business having control over how they do business issue.

The only place free speech is guaranteed is in our protection from government infringement in the 1st Amendment.  There are no 1st Amendment rights in private business.  The former owners of Twitter, a **** private business, decided they didn't want Trump's lies, or his supporters lies, racism, sexism, homophobia, and Jew bashing clogging up their platform...so they cleaned up their platform.

It's a private business, the owners of internet platforms legally have control over what shows up on their platform.  If somebody is saying something they don't like they can boot his/her *** out.  Just like if your boss at the private business where you work doesn't like the **** you're spewing around the office, he/she can boot your *** out too.

You are a horses ***.
 
 
 
User avatar
nefarious101
30 Nov 2022 7:31 am
User avatar
      
11,884 posts
IkeBana » 30 Nov 2022, 8:16 am » wrote: yep...you're a troll

I think I told you that 5 or 6 times already....is it finally sinking in?...about time!
ImageImage
User avatar
FOS
30 Nov 2022 7:32 am
FOS
User avatar
      
5,595 posts
IkeBana » 30 Nov 2022, 8:29 am » wrote: It isn't a free speech issue.  It's a private business having control over how they do business issue.

The only place free speech is guaranteed is in our protection from government infringement in the 1st Amendment.  There are no 1st Amendment rights in private business.  The former owners of Twitter, a **** private business, decided they didn't want Trump's lies, or his supporters lies, racism, sexism, homophobia, and Jew bashing clogging up their platform...so they cleaned up their platform.

It's a private business, the owners should have control.
It is a free speech issue. I don't care about how private a business is.
User avatar
Ike Bana
30 Nov 2022 7:44 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
2,427 posts
FOS » 30 Nov 2022, 8:32 am » wrote: It is a free speech issue. I don't care about how private a business is.
Then in addition to hating the Jews, you obviously hate the Constitution.

The law doesn't care about what or who you hate...you nazi horse's ***.
 
There are no free speech rights on internet platforms.
User avatar
FOS
30 Nov 2022 7:49 am
FOS
User avatar
      
5,595 posts
IkeBana » 30 Nov 2022, 8:44 am » wrote: Then in addition to hating the Jews, you obviously hate the Constitution.

The law doesn't care about what or who you hate...you nazi horse's ***.
I do not care one bit what is legal. And neither do you. Would you still be fighting for slavery in 1860 because that is the law?

Your hypocisy and double standards do not impress me
User avatar
Skans
30 Nov 2022 7:57 am
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
FOS » 30 Nov 2022, 8:25 am » wrote: it isn't a competition issue...but it is a free speech issue.
It is both.
 
User avatar
Cedar
30 Nov 2022 8:22 am
User avatar
Cannonpointer's Internet Barrister
Cannonpointer's Internet Barrister
2,829 posts
Damn, losing your easy access to kiddie porn really has you pissed, huh?
 
User avatar
Cedar
30 Nov 2022 8:24 am
User avatar
Cannonpointer's Internet Barrister
Cannonpointer's Internet Barrister
2,829 posts
IkeBana » 29 Nov 2022, 9:27 am » wrote: Twitter is a private business.  There are no 1st Amendment rights at a private business.  Three cheers for the Constitution.  Musk can run Twitter however he desires.  And companies that do business with Twitter can run their businesses as they desire.  If Apple doesn't want to provide the Twitter app to users on their app store, do you think the government should be able to force them?

Why do you hate the Constitution so much?
Starlink is also a private business, I wonder when Elon will release the Starphone.

**chuckle** 
 
User avatar
roadkill
30 Nov 2022 8:26 am
User avatar
      
21,743 posts
Wrong again Ike.


Apple is doing it to appease the CCP.  
1 2 3 4 5 6

Who is online

In total there are 9848 users online :: 13 registered, 18 bots, and 9817 guests
Bots: okhttp, MicroMessenger, DuckDuckBot, Bolt, Not, DuckDuckGo, NING, proximic, ADmantX, YandexBot, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, CriteoBot, Baiduspider, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, bingbot
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search