Your nazism does not impress the rest of the world.FOS » 30 Nov 2022, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ I do not care one bit what is legal. And neither do you. Would you still be fighting for slavery in 1860 because that is the law?
Your hypocisy and double standards do not impress me
MAGA/Q-ANON conspiracy theory **** propaganda.
Lol...that is always your way of admitting I won the argument
persons that live in the dream state of anything else is possible always chant of a win win outcome in a universal environment of adapting to the moment or become extinct regardless one person, one ancestry, one species, one food chain native to one atmosphere no win situation of only evolving here as a single reproductive displacement.FOS » 30 Nov 2022, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ Lol...that is always your way of admitting I won the argument
ohm aligns with the nazisomh » 30 Nov 2022, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ persons that live in the dream state of anything else is possible always chant of a win win outcome in a universal environment of adapting to the moment or become extinct regardless one person, one ancestry, one species, one food chain native to one atmosphere no win situation of only evolving here as a single reproductive displacement.
This is always your way of deflecting when you have been handed your stupid white polack *** on a plate.FOS » 30 Nov 2022, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ Lol...that is always your way of admitting I won the argument
how? I describe being part of one species with many different ancestral lineages that evolved that way by geographical conditions of their ancestral lineage evolved before 1,000 years ago when global travel started happening.
Lol cry moreIkeBana » 30 Nov 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ This is always your way of deflecting when you have been handed your stupid white polack *** on a plate.
What the government can and should do if Apple refuses to put their app on the Apple store is to file an anti-trust suit to stop Apple's monopoly, which will likely be the reason Apple doesn't try to de-platform them.IkeBana » 29 Nov 2022, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ Twitter is a private business. There are no 1st Amendment rights at a private business. Three cheers for the Constitution. Musk can run Twitter however he desires. And companies that do business with Twitter can run their businesses as they desire. If Apple doesn't want to provide the Twitter app to users on their app store, do you think the government should be able to force them?
Just following your lead Heinrich.
IkeBana » 30 Nov 2022, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ Just following your lead Heinrich.![]()
Nazi law is fine with you...so it's just the laws you don't like that you won't follow. How do you feel about cleaning up your **** laws, eh Guenther?
I think Congressional Republicans would support a mandatory **** granny law if they thought it would secure their seats Miu in the Congress.Zeets2 » 30 Nov 2022, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ What the government can and should do if Apple refuses to put their app on the Apple store is to file an anti-trust suit to stop Apple's monopoly, which will likely be the reason Apple doesn't try to de-platform them.
Do you really think that Musk wouldn't fight that blatant attempt to crush Twitter to the death? Or that the new Republican House would hesitate to file anti-trust legislation against a left-wing stalwart like Apple?
Well, you let me know whenever Musk turns to a far left zealot like you for advice, OK?IkeBana » 30 Nov 2022, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ I think Congressional Republicans would support a mandatory **** granny law if they thought it would secure their seats Miu in the Congress.
But suppose Musk decides he wants to open up a Let's **** Granny forum...does Apple or Google have to offer an app? **** no...they do not. Besides...
Best Alternative App Stores.
Nobody has a monopoly on app stores. Musk fought to his legal death and lost when he **** himself and signed the contract to purchase Twitter, because his bloated ego got the best of him.
Just more **** MAGA/Q-ANON propaganda from Zits.
Zeets2 » 30 Nov 2022, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, you let me know whenever Musk turns to a far left zealot like you for advice, OK?
Do you really think he wouldn't have all the support necessary before sinking billions into buying Twitter to cover all bases, when he pays millions for the best possible legal advice before doing so?
It's nothing more than the butthurt that libs like you now have, since you can no longer count on the liberal bias that Twitter had for years, and the prospect of a fair and politically balanced platform scares the **** out of libs like you, knowing liberals can NEVER simply compete on a level playing field.
Suck it up sweetie, and stop pouting! Remember, Santa is watching!
It's not my company and not my money, so there's nothing for me to be cocky about! I've never used Twitter and don't plan to do so now either. But I have no doubt that issue has already crossed the minds of him and his attorneys, and they'll handle it easily.FOS » 30 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑ don't get too cocky dude. The country is in fact ruled by insane tyrants. Elon can only do so much with money.
I'm not on the Twit either. But Twitter banned Trump- Rand Paul.. All the covid doctors speaking out the truth.. and anyone who spoke out. NOW all of a sudden... the libbies cry.. Freedom of Speech.!!! LOL HAZeets2 » 30 Nov 2022, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ It's not my company and not my money, so there's nothing for me to be cocky about! I've never used Twitter and don't plan to do so now either. But I have no doubt that issue has already crossed the minds of him and his attorneys, and they'll handle it easily.
I'm simply confident that Musk will have absolutely no problem with the complete transition of Twitter into an unbiased platform and that he's already got the plan in place to deal with Apple if they refuse to include the Twitter app in their App store.
Or is it your belief that the millions of Twitter users will not be outraged at Apple if they refuse, or that he wouldn't immediately file suit against them if they don't include it?
I don't think elon knew what he was getting himself into and he is probably gonna loseZeets2 » 30 Nov 2022, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ It's not my company and not my money, so there's nothing for me to be cocky about! I've never used Twitter and don't plan to do so now either. But I have no doubt that issue has already crossed the minds of him and his attorneys, and they'll handle it easily.
I'm simply confident that Musk will have absolutely no problem with the complete transition of Twitter into an unbiased platform and that he's already got the plan in place to deal with Apple if they refuse to include the Twitter app in their App store.
Or is it your belief that the millions of Twitter users will not be outraged at Apple if they refuse, or that he wouldn't immediately file suit against them if they don't include it?
I dont think he will Fossy. It will be interesting to see.FOS » 30 Nov 2022, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't think elon knew what he was getting himself into and he is probably gonna lose
Hmmm. Not on the TWIT,sootedupCyndi » 30 Nov 2022, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm not on the Twit either. But Twitter banned Trump- Rand Paul.. All the covid doctors speaking out the truth.. and anyone who spoke out. NOW all of a sudden... the libbies cry.. Freedom of Speech.!!! LOL HA
Musk taking over Twiiter.. IS a good start. There's much more to do!
And boy are they after him.. Hope he has alot of guts.. He's gonna need it.
well Miss Grumpy' s tits are growing. you onto them?nuckinfutz » 30 Nov 2022, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Hmmm. Not on the TWIT,
But on the ZIT
And the TIT![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
@sooted up Cyndi