It is well known that Hitler made deals with zionists in thr havaara agreement and that Jewish terrorist froups like Lehi supported the nazis against the British empire. His main immediate concern was getting jrws out of Germany and he did not care where they went.LowIQTrash » 27 Dec 2022, 1:16 am » wrote: ↑ Hello FOS
I would like to ask if you know about Hitler's intentions assuming he got his wishes (lebensraum via Ukraine to supply his nation with resources/Stalin's hypothetical surrender). Since he perceived "Judea" as the greatest existential threat, naturally he would need to address this...sooner rather than later I would hope.
If the Jewish mafia comes after you in full force, it's unlikely any nation - no matter how stalwart/technologically advanced - could survive such an onslaught.
Churchill was a drunk retard who was thoroughly beholden to Jews due to his profligate personal lifestyle + the fact the City of London was located in his backyard meant he was always going to be their (((SHABBOS GOY))), so I would ASSUME the UK would just conduct the equivalent of guerilla warfare since they never had the capacity to fight Germany on equal ground.
(It was also possible the Irish would have volunteered to help Germany in this scenario... "The enemy of my enemy" etc., although the extent of their assistance is questionable at best lol...)
The problem is "Israel" was not formally recognized until after the war (even if the resettling began prior)...so how would he deal with "Judea?" How do you even fight a phantom foe with no boundaries, no borders, etc.?
Another slight tangent:
Given the extent of (((International Finance))) wealth, as documented in the other thread I posted, I am finding it difficult to fathom if there is any way to repatriate the stolen/looted goods worth over $100T. The only scenarios I could imagine this happening are
1) Some kind of nuclear Armageddon and some g0yim survive (lol) to tell the tales and to deal with (((Them))) appropriately to ensure this type of global heist/enslavement never happens again...that's assuming the remaining g0yim are smart/intelligent/well-informed/brave enough
2) Extraterrestrial invasion...but instead of killing all lowly humans they set the poor g0yim free from the shackles of (((International Finance))) for god knows what reason
My imagination is slowly running its course. It seems to ME only some kind of miracle/deus ex machina can deal with the Octopus and its innumerable tentacles.
I see. I admit it was quite disheartening to learn how much was stolen since the 1500s (not even counting their looting prior to that, which would likely be in the mid-tens of Ts) but I overestimated the impact of ancient Chinese artifacts and megatons of gold bullion sitting idle in some clandestine caves.FOS » 27 Dec 2022, 1:28 am » wrote: ↑ It is well known that Hitler made deals with zionists in thr havaara agreement and that Jewish terrorist froups like Lehi supported the nazis against the British empire. His main immediate concern was getting jrws out of Germany and he did not care where they went.
But this was very temporary and he basically abandoned such projects quickly.
He is on record saying that it would be a serious mistake to construct a Jewish state...because that would serve as a base of operations for Jewish global power and a place where Jewish criminals could flee to. (Lots of Jewish pedos get to just flee to Israel to escape punishment).
As far as the economic question is concerned...I see no reason for despair. Ultimately the strength of an economy is based on production...abstract digits associated with banks are meaningless. You can literally just refuse to pay your debts to jews. And any backlash to that woukd certainly be no greater than simply being a country branded as antisemitic.
defeat Israel in battle. Accuse them of war crimes. Construct a Nuremberg war trial sort of kangaroo court and force them to pay 100 trillion in reperations for crimes against humanity, especially against Palestinians.
The real nature of political conflict/war has changed many times in history. All you need to is adapt and use a little imagination.LowIQTrash » 27 Dec 2022, 1:42 am » wrote: ↑ I see. I admit it was quite disheartening to learn how much was stolen since the 1500s (not even counting their looting prior to that, which would likely be in the mid-tens of Ts) but I overestimated the impact of ancient Chinese artifacts and megatons of gold bullion sitting idle in some clandestine caves.
As for defeating Israel, I feel like Jews are the types to nuke the entire globe to oblivion rather than to lose their possessions...lol...I can't prove that assertion but it's a very strong hunch.
Some kind of conflict IS inevitable, but I speculate some secret/covert ops is necessary first.
there is a species with 8 billion reproductions occupying space in this atmosphere with your living corpse not dead yet being one of them.FOS » 25 Dec 2022, 9:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Lol the very idea that there COULD be such a thing as a 'nation of individuals'! Lol.
this is politics foe retards!
I believe nobody is nuking Russia right now because Putin is 100% serious about nuclear retaliation. (((Zelensky))) et. al. also want to make some $ so they have no qualms letting this war drag on....the more the merrier.FOS » 27 Dec 2022, 2:09 am » wrote: ↑ The real nature of political conflict/war has changed many times in history. All you need to is adapt and use a little imagination.
After ww1, for example, most people believed war was no longer possible because technology made it impossible to acquire and control territory.
Well heinz guderian proved that wrong with the concept of the blitzkrieg. Just a bit of out of the box thinking.
Power is ultimately just a mind game. I think Alexander encapsulated this perfectly before the battle of arbella: "I will not steal victory, because the lands of persia are vast and there is no end to the armies that can be levied against us. But if they see they are beaten in the light of day, their heart will fail them".
I believe Jewish propaganda is failing miserably. Jonathan greenblatt is no Karl marx. Perhaps luxury has made them weak.
so sure. Any nuclear power can have a tantrum and blow **** up if then really want to...but woukd it help? Does it change anything?
nobody is nuking Russia right now...
I just want to know WHY they are so obsessed with that which has had the foreskin removed…maybe some Sociology or Psychology PhD can look into it?Cannonpointer » 08 Dec 2022, 2:00 am » wrote: ↑ I tend take a different view of communism's early advocates. I genuinely believe they were mentally ill - utterly deranged. They simply had zero concept of human nature, and they devised a system for soulless robots.
Again, I take a different view of conservatism. I do not believe they are greedy at all. I believe they are deranged - trapped in a tautology which promises them that if they can only utterly destroy any and all government programs beyond killing strangers and booking them Dano, The Most High and Holy Invisible Hand of the Market will magically and infallibly give every person his Proper Reward, and all will be right with the world.
This I generally agree with, except for the greed part. They prize SUCCESS, because within their tautology, it proves Right Action and the Favor of the Invisible Hand. Because they lack any deeper-than-surface principles, concepts, or education, they only have a single yardstick for measuring $ucce$$. It is not greed but derangement which makes them dangerous to puppies and soccer moms.
And not to step past another issue, which is the compulsive lunging after jew cock. They just cannot get enough.
I thought it was because they were…generally speaking, “dumb mofos”FOS » 09 Dec 2022, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Except Irish. The irish usually sucked. Mainly for religious reasons.
Yep, no surprise (((Murray Rothbard))) (((Ludwig von Mises))) (((Ayn Rand))) (((Milton Friedman))) are all libertarian ideology pushing tribe membersFOS » 26 Dec 2022, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑ lol...
'Freedom' and 'lack of coercion' is a thing that happens when there is no politics. It is a contradiction in terms to speak of the politics of freedom.
Politics happens when you recognize that there are rival groups who will seek to dominate and destroy eachither...yes even if they are citizens of the aame country...
And every single 'individual' is in fact on a side. Like it or not. And if they have some stupid 'principles' that prevent them from taking their own side, then they might as well just kill themselves.
Your fear of being on a side is literally just the result of brainwashing imposed on people who are very aware that they are not on your side lol. It is very easy for them to dominate you when you have zero political will...
NATO is learning that Russia'sLowIQTrash » 27 Dec 2022, 2:47 am » wrote: ↑ I believe nobody is nuking Russia right now because Putin is 100% serious about nuclear retaliation. (((Zelensky))) et. al. also want to make some $ so they have no qualms letting this war drag on....the more the merrier.
I brought up the possibility of "nuclear tantrum" to account for all the potential outcomes. Given the sheer, unfathomable (to normies/NPCs at least) level of psychopathy (((they))) have displayed, I believe the probability of such an outcome is not trivial. (at least 20%)
Putin made the same threat..."let us conduct this war vs Ukraine on the ground, and if NATO interferes and tries to destroy/obliterate Russia then nukes will start flying."
TBH I wouldn't even be surprised if (((they))) already had a contingency for this outcome...basically let's say they lose "the war" and forfeit control over banking/finance/control of major transnational corps/gold/intellectual property/etc. and surrender all their ill-gotten gains.
The top brass hide in their bunkers (or at least a few members in each family...they might throw the elders under the bus LMAO) and wait out the nuclear winter to "reset" their so-called "game" (as the current one might be "unplayable" to them).
Anyway, it's hard for me to prove anything so I'll stop here, but nuclear weaponry is just one big "RESET" button that I fear they won't have qualms using as a last resort + have made plans to ensure their own continuity in such a sequence of events.
Well, according to top economists at Harvard, Yale, U of Chicago, etc. we “don’t need” any manufacturing.Sumela » 05 Apr 2024, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ NATO is learning that Russia's
War Industry is larger and more efficient than the entire West.
Russia doesnt let decades old factories go fallow...they refit and MOVE FORWARD!
Michael Hudson has spent years debunking the use of GDP is an honest measurement.LowIQTrash » 06 Apr 2024, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Well, according to top economists at Harvard, Yale, U of Chicago, etc. we “don’t need” any manufacturing.
All we need to do is shuffle some money around and our economy is golden! Coz
G E E
D E E
P E E