Liberal Forum

jack » 09 Dec 2022, 4:19 am » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 4:19 am

You must not realize the complete stupidity of that.

 Thank you, precious. 

Ike Bana » 09 Dec 2022, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 8:31 am

What a stupid **** question.  FUZ has opinions on everything.
 

Opinions aren't understanding the total sum of how things exist spontaneously here as specifically simultaneously present each is never same total sum again within their sole "relative" time cycle present.

that childish origami in my signature maps geometric event horizons between details specifically evolving now.

Each can measure inorganic as well as organisms as a whole species, ancestral lineage with last 5 gaps of reproductions left living one reproduction at a time. Between philosophy of thinking outside a box, governed by 6 degrees of separation 16 great great grandparents sustaining 4 parallel vertical axses to mom and dad delivering each great great grandchild the open ended 8 corners are siblings that never become 1 of 16 great great grandparents.

Kintic evolving accounted for as actually did, doing, added forward one at a time until no additions arriving again. i.e. extinction event took place currently.

jack » 09 Dec 2022, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 6:24 am

 A guy who calls himself Cannonpointer and 98% macho man and accuses guys he knows nothing about of being gay, gets a *** comment of some kind in every other thing he posts, is probably a repressed *** himself.

Define "repressed."

I'm certainly not operating on the democrat model: See a dick, suck a dick.

Also, no ***.

jack » 09 Dec 2022, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 6:24 am

Unless he's making fun of himself. He doesn't seem like an intentional clown though - it’s unintentional, so will let that one go.  In your case, you have enough dumbness along with *** to say, "monarchs are constrained by parliaments" in reference to 1792 France. Not a good package, pal.

Are these lobs, you little ***? Are you flirting?

Louis 16 was a mild fellow - a reformer, FFS. One of the first things he did on accession was get rid of his granddad's measures that nutted parliament. He was regularly thwarted by parliament - more constrained by them than previous kings. He embraced the revolution and was titled "Restorer of French Liberty" by the Revolutionary National Assembly.

The guy was a **** milk sop- which is why he got steam-rollered, dumb ***.

You should GOOGLE, then post, fruitcake.
 

IkeBana » 09 Dec 2022, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 8:31 am

What a stupid **** question.  FUZ has opinions on everything.

He is a Font Of Sense, I will grant.
 

Cannonpointer » 09 Dec 2022, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 9:00 am

He is a Font Of Sense, I will grant.
 

sure that wasn't Since because he has no natural senses working to navigate his real time adapting in series parallel displacement as conceived like any other lifetime here now?

Cannonpointer » 09 Dec 2022, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 8:56 am

Define "repressed."

I'm certainly not operating on the democrat model: See a dick, suck a dick.

Also, no ***.

Are these lobs, you little ***? Are you flirting?

Louis 16 was a mild fellow - a reformer, FFS. One of the first things he did on accession was get rid of his granddad's measures that nutted parliament. He was regularly thwarted by parliament - more constrained by them than previous kings. He embraced the revolution and was titled "Restorer of French Liberty" by the Revolutionary National Assembly.

The guy was a **** milk sop- which is why he got steam-rollered, dumb ***.

You should GOOGLE, then post, fruitcake.

The "parliament" as you call The National Assembly didn't exist for most of all Louis' long reign; only came into being when the revolution started and everything went to ****. Look up a little history, then post. I know mine already, repressed sweetie.
 

jack » 09 Dec 2022, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 9:14 am

The "parliament" as you call The National Assembly didn't exist for most of all Louis' long reign; only came into being when the revolution started and everything went to ****. Look up a little history, then post, repressed sweetie.

separation of repressed and suppressed. repressed is by personal choice, suppressed is social coercion to compromise with deniers or else be eliminated from humanity's institutions of reasonable doubt giving ancestors freedom to pretend life is more than adapting while timed apart in plain sight.

Jack, off the mark on that post as usual.

Nostradamus'omh » 09 Dec 2022, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 9:19 am

separation of repressed and suppressed. repressed is by personal choice, suppressed is social coercion to compromise with deniers or else be eliminated from humanity's institutions of reasonable doubt giving ancestors freedom to pretend life is more than adapting while timed apart in plain sight.

Jack, off the mark on that post as usual.

Jack meant repressed. You're not the best judge of what is or isn't on the mark. .

jack » 09 Dec 2022, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 10:02 am

Jack meant repressed. You're not the best judge of what is or isn't on the mark. .

Wow third person narrative. You doing the out of body projection again? You really evolved out of your skin.

Nostradamus'omh » 09 Dec 2022, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 10:04 am

Wow third person narrative. You doing the out of body projection again? You really evolved out of your skin.

Jack is the character I play here. I suspect neither is your name Nostramus'omh or that you say things like "separation of repressed and suppressed. repressed is by personal choice, suppressed is social coercion to compromise with deniers or else be eliminated from humanity's institutions"  at the dinner table.

jack » 09 Dec 2022, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 9:14 am

The "parliament" as you call The National Assembly didn't exist for most of all Louis' long reign; only came into being when the revolution started and everything went to ****. Look up a little history, then post. I know mine already, repressed sweetie.

I never said that the revolutionary national assembly pre-existed the revolution. But parliament did, your mouth-**** notwithstanding.

Again, fruitcake - just google, and THEN run your dick trap. You're making me feel back for tard-abuse.
 
 

jack » 09 Dec 2022, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 11:11 am

Jack is the character I play here. I suspect neither is your name Nostramus'omh or that you say things like "separation of repressed and suppressed. repressed is by personal choice, suppressed is social coercion to compromise with deniers or else be eliminated from humanity's institutions"  at the dinner table.

ha ha ha changing the topic again. great spinoff jack. I don't debate, I discuss the separation of actual life and acted out franchised realities corrupted my ancestry since dawn of civilization.

What are you doing to correct absolute corruption besides enabling it forward?

Nostradamus'omh » 09 Dec 2022, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 1:01 pm

ha ha ha changing the topic again. great spinoff jack. I don't debate, I discuss the separation of actual life and acted out franchised realities corrupted my ancestry since dawn of civilization.

What are you doing to correct absolute corruption besides enabling it forward?

enabling it backward which is harder.

jack » 09 Dec 2022, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 1:10 pm

enabling it backward which is harder.

life doesn't evolve backwards at any time. enabling corrupts the natural eternal separation of existing reproductions limited to their one cycle adapting to the moment here as occupying space in their current geographical displacement.

Repeating the same corrupted practices each generation gap changing people present isn't backwards at all. it is still evolving as eternally separated now and 99% of the population isn't allowed by law to do anything or else humanity kills global supply chain as demonstrated during Covid pandemic.

Look at the chaos staged everywhere. 24/7 news the world is erupting into complete meltdown so ruling elites have to save humanity's means to direct outcomes of each incoming great great grandchild or else.

I just realized something... Frankenstein is a Jew. Franken -stein. Anybody else noticed this?
 

Warcok » 09 Dec 2022, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 1:18 pm

I just realized something... Frankenstein is a Jew. Franken -stein. Anybody else noticed this?
 

sure, but was the Dr. the monster or his reanimated creation?

Cannonpointer » 09 Dec 2022, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 12:55 pm

I never said that the revolutionary national assembly pre-existed the revolution. But parliament did, your mouth-**** notwithstanding.

Again, fruitcake - just google, and THEN run your dick trap. You're making me feel back for tard-abuse.

Okay, repressed one, you got me to google. You meant parlement, the French judicial system, a non legislative body. You're right they did give Louis a hard time. They
blocked his efforts to tax the aristocrats in order to save the nation. What they got for their trouble was the revolution and the end of their existence.

FOS » 08 Dec 2022, 11:02 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2022, 11:02 pm

i do not agree at all. religion and nationalism were always at odds. And they still are.

in fact this has been ESPECIALLY true ever since charles darwin.

How do you square that with you comment that monarchy was always a religious institution?

I agree it always was though the connection was inherently uneasy.  When popular government arrived religion still remained at the center. In the United States it's "in God we trust" not the people we elect. Or so we pretend.
 

jack » 09 Dec 2022, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 2:10 pm

How do square that with you comment that monarchy was always a religious institution?

I agree it always was though the connection was inherently uneasy.  When popular government arrived religion still remained at the center. In the United States it's "in God we trust" not the people we elect. Or so we pretend.

The fact monarchy was a religious institution supports my point...

Monarchy was also always at odds with nationalism...

Why wouldn't it be? Nationalism Is loyalty to a people...it is a mass movement. 

Lol monarchs usually weren't even the same ethnicity as their subjects

you expect the Irish or the scottish nationalists to support the British empire? What about Indians and Chinese? Lol

FOS » 09 Dec 2022, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2022, 2:18 pm

The fact monarchy was a religious institution supports my point...

Monarchy was also always at odds with nationalism...

Why wouldn't it be? Nationalism Is loyalty to a people...it is a mass movement. 

Lol monarchs usually weren't even the same ethnicity as their subjects

you expect the Irish or the scottish nationalists to support the British empire? What about Indians and Chinese? Lol

Well, I expect the various ethnic immigrants in the U.S. to develop loyalty here, as they have in the past. Nationalism is more than loyalty to a people as you just defined them. It's also loyalty to the values the nation embraces.