Selaphobia » 26 Dec 2022, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑ To trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies. Not mRNA vaccines. Instead, mRNA vaccines use mRNA created in a laboratory to teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies.
mRNA vaccines technology has been researched since the 1960's The Covid-19 was the first time mRNA was used for humans.
Basically a gene altering experiment. Comprende? They carried out a scientific experiment on the public.
You lied when you said you think, fruitcake.Monderegal » 26 Dec 2022, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Well two things with that one. First, denying that anyone or hardly anyone died of Covid is against any rational evidence. I think it's just flat Earth syndrome. Vaccines work and they have worked dating back at least the 19th century.
No, dick sucker, YOU are, when you lie that he was against the death jab.Monderegal » 26 Dec 2022, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Second, you are only clearing Trump of all guilt and critic.
Trump pushed the trump vaccine through.Monderegal » 26 Dec 2022, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑Trump isn't the magic perfect warrior king sent from Yahwah to rule America as its greatest champion. His supporters spread lies about the effectiveness of the vaccine and whether or not Trump is culpable depends on the fact that he would not refute those claims. It gave him political advantage to scour his opponents with a misinformation regime. People who were dying of Covid were claiming that it wasn't Covid to their dying breath. Yet all evidence and rationality falls by the wayside when Trump is being defended. I think its called demagoguery.
https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight ... accination
No, not "many."Selaphobia » 26 Dec 2022, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑ To trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies.
On the stupid. Not on those who think for themselves.
Well it's nice that you are using actual news sources. I'm not going to do the complete research on this but the commitments you posted state the position that if the scientific community at the CDC and other world class health facilities approved a vaccine they would take it. I think what they are referring to is some of the treatments that Donald Trump pushed as a snake oil salesman and yes, he did say something like drinking bleach might cure Covid. That is the remarks in proper context. Biden and Harris didn't question the Moderna (a vaccine I've received three doses of as mandated by hospital policy) and Pfizer vaccines that have proven effective. Look at the history of smallpox if you think vaccines don't work and do the science. I could elaborate on how mRNA vaccines work and that they have been under research for years. Trump suggested people drink bleach to cure Covid. That was the point of their remarks. Also, explain to me why those who voted for Trump were much more unlikely to take the vaccine than those that voted for Biden in the 2020 election cycle. And please, try not to argue with me the definition of a vaccine. That's probably stretching your pro Trump argument a little too far.Cannonpointer » 26 Dec 2022, 8:04 pm » wrote: ↑ You lied when you saidyou think, fruitcake.
Vaccines - like men and women - have definitions, you fruit.Just CALLING it a vaccine doesn't make it one. Indeed, you stupid queer, using YOUR OWNARGUMENT, the covid abortion is by definition NOT a vaccine, because it doesn't work, stupe.
No, dick sucker, YOU are, when you lie that he was against the death jab.
Trump pushed the trumpvaccine through.
BIDEN questioned whether people should take it.
PELOSI questioned whether people should take it.
HARRIS questioned whether people should take it.
That's YOUR team, dick sucker. ^
Trump NEVER questioned whether people should take it, you stupid queer.
Now - mouthy dick sucking liar: HERE IS MY PROOF. Where's yours, queer?
SHOW US TRUMP STANDING AGAINST THE VACCINE, MOUTH.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40eZeXPyJ0g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BSy4xWwf6Y
But it will not stop you from running your dick kisser, you weak ***.
Do you remember that thread I posted about how "they" - and I say "they" instead of (((They))) this time because I don't even think the Tiny Hats were responsible for this travesty (it was the corrupt Shabbos Goy like Fauci) - changed the PCR cycle threshold?Cannonpointer » 26 Dec 2022, 9:07 pm » wrote: ↑ But it will not stop you from running your dick kisser, you weak ***.
You will make claims you cannot back while dismissing the counter-claims that ARE backed, because you're a weak little dick sucker.
It just goes to show how libtards pay attention to the retarded media and not science.Selaphobia » 24 Dec 2022, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ YOU SEE THAT INFORMATION (100% TRUE)
MASKS DO NOT WORK, STICK THE MASKS UP YOUR **** ***
^^^^^^Prove it.Monderegal » 23 Dec 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑ Masking up probably just prolonged exposure to the virus.
IkeBana » 27 Dec 2022, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑ ^^^^^^Prove it.
Here's how scientific method works. Scientists report on the latest legitimate information they have. When they discover or receive additional legitimate information, they report on that. As the science develops the reported changes.
Sounds like once you hear something that should be it for the rest of your life. My suggestion to you is...GROW THE **** UP.
I'm not providing a link. The use of masks goes back at least 20 years in the medical practice for anyone who has been in a hospital or the wide spread use of them in places like China for dealing with a range of airborne diseases. It's just commonsense. Masks are used, that really doesn't require medical study at this point. It is pretty well founded practice.
lol... follow the science...Monderegal » 27 Dec 2022, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ There is scientific evidence that masks keep virus particles from reaching the body through nasal and oral pathways. I think the world wide and long term use of them in the medical practice proves that. But I guess the Easter bunny exists.

LowIQTrash » 27 Dec 2022, 2:40 am » wrote: ↑ Do you remember that thread I posted about how "they" - and I say "they" instead of (((They))) this time because I don't even think the Tiny Hats were responsible for this travesty (it was the corrupt Shabbos Goy like Fauci) - changed the PCR cycle threshold?
THIS.Nostradamus'omh » 23 Dec 2022, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ The global reaction to Covid-19 was a bad idea made worse by 2 years of implementation.
The only purpose of mask is to protect others from your infections. That's why surgeons wear them. It was Joseph Lister who first discovered the danger of opportunistic infections. The numbers were pulled together by Florence Nightingale and used to prove that infections killed more soldiers than war wounds.Monderegal » 27 Dec 2022, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ There is scientific evidence that masks keep virus particles from reaching the body through nasal and oral pathways. I think the world wide and long term use of them in the medical practice proves that. But I guess the Easter bunny exists.
Wow, same thing I said minus correcting corruption forward as you insist on maintaining reasonable doubt all the time.Tempest62 » 27 Dec 2022, 7:37 pm » wrote: ↑ THIS.
Because it was neither about science nor medicine….had zero to do with either.
It was about using the population as the 4th trial, and to determine how compliant the public is to irrelevant govt orders (power).