I would have loved to see him and Bruce Lee go at it!Taipan » 15 Jan 2023, 12:35 am » wrote: ↑ Sir,
He would kick the dog-**** out of you.![]()
@Squatchman
https://youtu.be/t235RkgR1MI
Yes. Is Blackrock the largest shareholder of BofA? No. Is Blackrock the largest shareholder of Wells Fargo? No. Even if Blackrock was, that would still only be about 6% of the stock. So, even if Blackrock is the largest shareholder of Wells, does a 6% shareholder of one of the largest US banks control the Federal Reserve?
Oh ****! ASSHOPPER! Ya Got Me!Taipan » 15 Jan 2023, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Sir,
here is what you are missing.
They are both..........."Spiritual Masters".![]()
https://youtu.be/j1wjvP-raOI
Taipan » 15 Jan 2023, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Sir,
here is what you are missing.
They are both..........."Spiritual Masters".![]()
https://youtu.be/j1wjvP-raOI
do you know the names of the individuals who signed the Fed into existence in 1913? Like WarburgSkans » 15 Jan 2023, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes. Is Blackrock the largest shareholder of BofA? No. Is Blackrock the largest shareholder of Wells Fargo? No. Even if Blackrock was, that would still only be about 6% of the stock. So, even if Blackrock is the largest shareholder of Wells, does a 6% shareholder of one of the largest US banks control the Federal Reserve?
The Discussion between Cannonpointer and I is whether the Jews control the Federal Reserve. I pointed out that it is a creature of Congress even though banks are members. I also pointed out that Congress is charged with oversight of the Federal Reserve and the President appoints board members. So, my point is that if Fink doesn't control even one of the two larges banks, each of whom would be members of the Federal Reserve, then how are the Fed Board members a "beard" for the Jewish-controlled banks? FWIW, you would have been better off naming Jaimie Dimon, CEO and largest shareholder of of Chase, and I am sure Chase is a member-bank of the Fed.
SJConspirator » 15 Jan 2023, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑ do you know the names of the individuals who signed the Fed into existence in 1913?
Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernadine, etc..
If 90% of the original signatories are Jews, and 90% of past Chairmen of the Fed are Jews, do you start to see a pattern?
Real power is something you take.FOS » 09 Jan 2023, 10:22 pm » wrote: ↑ fundamentally, all currency is actually based on power.
if you are the world hegemon, like the USA has been, you can print whatever fiat currency you want and become the worlds reserve currency because your power ensures stability.
people care about what their currency can buy. and if that is ONLY gold, then currency is not worth much.
instead, if you choose to base your currency on some tangible resource (such as gold or petrol)...what really happens is you inflate artificially the demand for that product. Thus william jennings brian, for example, ran on a platform to make US currency backed by silver...because that would be good for the agrarian people in the north and south US, who had plenty of silver but very little gold...as opposed to the east and west who had a lot of gold.
people who complain about currency stuff rarely seem to actually understand many of the finer points of it. I certainly am not an expert myself...but i do feel like i just happen to know more than the average 'goldbug'...
but yeah...ignoring WHO is in control of the financial system is stupid...and attempting to eliminate financial heirarchy is just as much a silly pipedream as trying to eliminate political hierarchy.
libertarians tend to be people who are silly enough to think that anarchy can possibly be a viable and stable system...rather than just a transition between two different elites.
In 1913? No, I don't. And, I don't really care. Probably Congress, and the President at the time, if I had to guess. Couldn't have happened without Congress and the President.SJConspirator » 15 Jan 2023, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑ do you know the names of the individuals who signed the Fed into existence in 1913? Like Warburg
I don't think Greenspan had anything to do with the Fed in 1913. Nor Bernanke. In fact, I believe Greenspan hasn't had any involvement with the Federal Reserve for over 15 years. And, Bernanke hasn't had any involvement since, I think 2014? So, you've basically found a few jews throughout history that served on the Fed's Board. Yet, you claim the jews control the Fed. Or, Cannonpointer does, I suppose. LOL In fact, I think the ones you mentioned are both Republicans, one possibly a libertarian. Yet, you ignore the ones the libtards appoint, like Jannet Yellen, Lisa Cook, Philip Jefferson and Sarah Bloom Raskin (who probably is a Jew).chairmen
Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, etc..
If 90% of the original signatories are Jews, and 90% of past Chairmen of the Fed are Jews, do you start to see a pattern?
They did. On Game of Death.
Really? Is that a movie? On You Tube?Squatchman » 16 Jan 2023, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑ They did. On Game of Death.
Chuck became one of Bruce's students shortly after.
This was when Chuck was lightweight karate champion of the world.
Squatchman » 16 Jan 2023, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑ They did. On Game of Death.
Chuck became one of Bruce's students shortly after.
This was when Chuck was lightweight karate champion of the world.
Lots of people know lots more about firearms than I do. I've just had the good fortune to hang out with experts who taught me a thing or two. You've got the O/U shotgun experts, the Single Action Army experts, the Colt Dragoon experts, the Remington NMA experts, machine gun experts, '89 import ban experts, AW Ban experts, German Luger Experts, Swiss Luger experts, WWI era 1911 experts, WWII era 1911 experts, Revolutionary Rifle experts - ****, the list goes on and on and on.Taipan » 16 Jan 2023, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ You can bring good info to the table.............when you want to.
That is what I want from you.
Thank you.
Is it true that you & Skan-Dog know more about firearms than I do?
I think both of you carry more info than I do.
( & I am no lightweight)![]()
@Skans
https://youtu.be/K4FESGjiH3s
Squatchman » 16 Jan 2023, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑ They did. On Game of Death.
Chuck became one of Bruce's students shortly after.
This was when Chuck was lightweight karate champion of the world.
SJConspirator » 10 Jan 2023, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑ Peepee needs to get in here and cry and bitch and moan hysterically
3…2…1…
market'...] ...your stinking 'christian' republicrats 'signed it into existence', dumb@ss... they still support 'it' today, goofus...SJConspirator » 15 Jan 2023, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑ do you know the names of the individuals who signed the Fed into existence in 1913? Like Warburg
chairmen
Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, etc..
If 90% of the original signatories are Jews, and 90% of past Chairmen of the Fed are Jews, do you start to see a pattern?
You are an idiot and wasted a load of breath and bandwidth over this. Here's the deal - In America, you and everyone has a choice. You can use precious metals for currency to your heart's content, assuming that you can find others to accept it. Or, bitcoin, or Mercury dimes.....or even dog-****. Whatever you think you want to use for currency, go for it. No one is stopping you. So, if you or anyone is so concerned about the Fed printing money, then DON'T F-ING USE IT!!!LowIQTrash » 09 Jan 2023, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Anthology Volume #1 of Dunning-Kruger Syndrome (DKS)
Location: Some random forum elsewhere
*Recollection of conversation, exact words not used here*
==========================================================
Libertardian: [Does his usual, predictable routine of showing a graph of how the US dollar has been devalued since 1913]
Me: Yeah...
Libertardian: So we need to go back to the GS
Me: That's a terrible idea, lol
Libertardian: Why? With a GS the central bank can't just "print money" at will
Me: No, that is false. In many cases throughout history, kings/emperors would order the "money" (in the form of gold/silver/cheap metal) to be devalued...the coins would be clipped/melted down and the debased coinage recirculated at "par value"
Libertardian: That's why we need a pure gold standard. No other metals.
Me: First of all...pretty much no society has stuck with a "pure gold standard" for long...and for good reasons too...reasons which I don't think you can figure out since you are too busy on **** websites like Mises.org
Second of all, you didn't pay attention. The coins can simply be "clipped" (volume reduction) - either way the result is the same. Making gold the only "legal tender" doesn't change anything at all.
Third of all, no society that has survived to the present day has, at one point or another, NOT engaged in "money printing." How do you think your revered "Founding Fathers" won the War? By begging the Bank of England to finance their troops?
Look up "The Continental"
Libertardian: You mean societies like Zimbabwe? Or Weimar Germany? They must have done so well /s [sarcasm tag]
Me: Zimbabwe is just...unsalvageable because the population is too stupid to be productive/capable of economic development. Whether their leadership ruins the currency or not is irrelevant LMAO
As for Weimar Germany, the circumstances that led to hyperinflation are complicated and isn't "lol they were printing money."
If you had a greater-than-surface level understanding, you would know a certain "group of people" were responsible for destroying the currency...which enabled "those same people" to buy up any remaining German assets (that weren't confiscated after the War) for pennies on the dollar (as said "group of people" would never be stupid enough to keep their assets denominated in papiermark) but according to lolibertardians, the racial/ethnic background of the "owners" is irrelevant...lol
Libertardian: I see where you're going...typical racist blather mixed in with crazy conspiracy theories
Me: I don't have a problem with racism....well, maybe I would when it's used AGAINST me. But since you are a "colorblind" lolibertarian it doesn't matter...the scope of that topic is beyond your meager understanding XD...and yes "conspiracies" exist, you're just too blind/too much of an ideologue to notice
(To be continued below due to character limit)
Skans » 19 Jan 2023, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ You are an idiot and wasted a load of breath and bandwidth over this. Here's the deal - In America, you and everyone has a choice. You can use precious metals for currency to your heart's content, assuming that you can find others to accept it. Or, bitcoin, or Mercury dimes.....or even dog-****. Whatever you think you want to use for currency, go for it. No one is stopping you. So, if you or anyone is so concerned about the Fed printing money, then DON'T F-ING USE IT!!!