Take my bet or be muted from now on.FJB » 06 Feb 2023, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑ A **** opinion piece from AP. Damn shilly you really are a retard.
You DO realize that he was NOT addressing "Russian Collusion' right **** FOR BRAINS???ScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑ That's your opinion. Mueller said it wasn't conclusive.
Mueller declares his Russia report did not exonerate Trump | AP News
Your feelings don't change the fact that Mueller stated that the evidence was inconclusive.Beekeeper » 06 Feb 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ You DO realize that he was NOT addressing "Russian Collusion' right **** FOR BRAINS???
That was his statement on "obstruction of justice" and he even said that if there was a crime, he would have said so!!
YOU REALLY ARE A PIECE OF IDIOT WORK!!
ScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Your feelings don't change the fact that Mueller stated that the evidence was inconclusive.
**** won't take the bet. Muted you are.
Then you should have NO PROBLEM showing us that in the REPORT!!!ScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I see that you don't quite understand. I'll try more crayons. Mueller couldn't prove Trump's involvement conclusively and admitted that It's quite possible that Trump DID collude with Russia.
He NEVER said that, DOOFUS!! EVER!!!ScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Your feelings don't change the fact that Mueller stated that the evidence was inconclusive.
SHOW US A DIRECT QUOTE OR VIDEO, DUMBFARK!!ScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I see that you don't quite understand. I'll try more crayons. Mueller couldn't prove Trump's involvement conclusively and admitted that It's quite possible that Trump DID collude with Russia.
So the Mueller report Said Trump colluded with Russia?ScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I see that you don't quite understand. I'll try more crayons. Mueller couldn't prove Trump's involvement conclusively and admitted that It's quite possible that Trump DID collude with Russia.
Gave you a link. You ignored it.Beekeeper » 06 Feb 2023, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑ SHOW US A DIRECT QUOTE OR VIDEO, DUMBFARK!!
GO!!!
(you can't because Mueller NEVER said that, EVER!!)
ScottMon
Gave you a link. You ignored it.
Mueller declares his Russia report did not exonerate Trump | AP News
“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” Mueller declared.
You can calm down now. You have your quote.
shilly that is an opinion piece not proof you asswipe
He's discussing the OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE claim, DUMBARSE, not RUSSIAN COLLUSION!!ScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Gave you a link. You ignored it.
Mueller declares his Russia report did not exonerate Trump | AP News
“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” Mueller declared.
You can calm down now. You have your quote.
You are making an emotional argument and it's failing. Mueller never cleared Trump of collusion and said so.Beekeeper » 06 Feb 2023, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ He's discussing the OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE claim, DUMBARSE, not RUSSIAN COLLUSION!!
His REPORT CLEARLY STATED THAT....
“did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”
You have GOT TO BE the DUMBEST POS that ever sucked good air meant for decent people.
That would be true if it was a court case involved, But Mueller didn't have the power to charge Trump even if he found conclusive evidence.Warcok » 06 Feb 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ So basically Trump was exonerated from any wrongdoing and there was no colluding but the anti-trump Robert Mueller and his band of anti-Trump angry dimocrats decided to play word games in the report .
" We didn't find evidence that he concluded with Russia, but we also didn't find evidence that he didn't collude with Russia"
Innocent until proven guilty. They investigated him for 2 years and found no evidence of collusion. Therefore he was exonerated.![]()
If Trump colluded or did anything wrong it would have been in the report but nothing's in there but an exonerated TrumpScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ That would be true if it was a court case involved, But Mueller didn't have the power to charge Trump even if he found conclusive evidence.
Mueller stated that it didn't exonerate him.Warcok » 06 Feb 2023, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑ If Trump colluded or did anything wrong it would have been in the report but nothing's in there but an exonerated Trump
Are you THAT F'ing STUPID??? I GAVE YOU THE DIRECT QUOTE FROM THE MUELLER REPORT!!!!ScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑ You are making an emotional argument and it's failing. Mueller never cleared Trump of collusion and said so.
Trump don't need Mueller to say He's exonerated. The fact that he found no wrongdoing by Trump is the exoneration itself of any wrongdoing.