Oh, I see. You are an idiot. No crayons can explain this to you. Sorry, I am sure your co-workers give you special stars for the days when you don't spit up on yourself.Beekeeper » 08 Feb 2023, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ NO flaw in my argument as I QUOTED VERBATIM what Mueller wrote in his REPORT, snowflake!!
What you have is NO SUCH WORDS said that Trump might still be guilty. The REPORT NEVER SAID THAT!! PERIOD!!
Oh look, your getting al emotional now!! Just like you have been for the past 30 posts!!ScottMon » 08 Feb 2023, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, I see. You are an idiot. No crayons can explain this to you. Sorry, I am sure your co-workers give you special stars for the days when you don't spit up on yourself.
ScottMon » 08 Feb 2023, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, I see. You are an idiot. No crayons can explain this to you. Sorry, I am sure your co-workers give you special stars for the days when you don't spit up on yourself.
You don't care about the facts. You just want to blame people. You can't understand that It's possible that Trump did work with Russia to get elected.Beekeeper » 08 Feb 2023, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ Oh look, your getting al emotional now!! Just like you have been for the past 30 posts!!
Run along child and get mommy to change your diaper. It's overfilled now as it is. You've proven NOTHING other than some one has an OPINION of what the report said and the FACTS ARE, your claim isn't in it. ADD TO THAT, you have POSTED NO DIRECT QUOTES SUPPORTING YOUR CASE!! YOU LOSE!!
Still got your crayons out playing with them?? Nice!!!ScottMon » 08 Feb 2023, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑ You don't care about the facts. You just want to blame people. You can't understand that It's possible that Trump did work with Russia to get elected.
Careful, You are getting drool on your keyboard.Beekeeper » 08 Feb 2023, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑ Still got your crayons out playing with them?? Nice!!!
Color the bear, numbnuts. Did mommy change your diaper yet??
scotts mom used to be his nurse also, always cleaning him up.
I gave you a chance to prove that I admitted to being Will Franklin. You chickened out.FJB » 08 Feb 2023, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ scotts mom used to be his nurse also, always cleaning him up.
LMFAO you just gave more proof who you really are *******....
ScottMon » 08 Feb 2023, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑ I gave you a chance to prove that I admitted to being Will Franklin. You chickened out.
NO me drooling poopyface!! You should stop playing in your diaper and smearing it all over yourself.
Opinions are like assholes...everybody's got one and they all stink. Of course, none stinks as bad as FJB's.
IkeBana » 08 Feb 2023, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ Opinions are like assholes...everybody's got one and they all stink. Of course, none stinks as bad as FJB's.
The Mueller Report did not recommend indictmemts being filed against Trump for one reason only. Because Mueller was choosing to follow the standing DOJ policy that a sitting President cannot be federally indicted. AND THAT IS AGENCY POLICY, IT IS NOT THE LAW. It is not against the law to criminally indict a sitting President.Beekeeper » 08 Feb 2023, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑ So what DIRECT QUOTE did you provide FROM MUELLER'S REPORT that supports your **** CLAIM?? Oh that's right, you haven't!! YOU LOSE!!
More opinions.FJB » 08 Feb 2023, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑IkeBana » 08 Feb 2023, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ Opinions are like assholes...everybody's got one and they all stink. Of course, none stinks as bad as FJB's.
I live rent free in your **** fat head bitch boi
Yeah, ****, that's what I said. The ARGUMENT is over "collusion" of which MUELLER FOUND NONE EXISTED!!IkeBana » 08 Feb 2023, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ The Mueller Report did not recommend indictmemts being filed against Trump for one reason only. Because Mueller was choosing to follow the standing DOJ policy that a sitting President cannot be federally indicted. AND THAT IS AGENCY POLICY, IT IS NOT THE LAW. It is not against the law to criminally indict a sitting President.
But Mueller clearly laid out plenty of evidence of actions by Trump that constitute obstruction of justice. The most glaring...the firing of FBI Director Comey because he refused to comply with Trump’s demand that he drop the investigation of Michael Flynn. That is a clear act of obstruction of justice. Even in Barr's written summary on the Mueller report, he acknowledged that Trump was "not exonerated" of obstruction by Mueller.
More flaming from Beekeeper in 5...4...3...2...1...
What argument? You don't make arguments, asshole. You spew invective. Within the scope of the Mueller investigation he was unable to put together enough evidence of collusion to identify it in his report. Does that mean there was zero collusion between Trump and his people and Putin and his people...no it does not.Beekeeper » 08 Feb 2023, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, ****, that's what I said. The ARGUMENT is over "collusion" of which MUELLER FOUND NONE EXISTED!!
You need to go **** yourself. Tell ya what...if mother nature was stupid enough to allow you to reproduce...go give your orders to your **** mutant offspring...wanker.