I said that Trump wasn't cleared as per Mueller.Beekeeper » 06 Feb 2023, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ The STATEMENT MADE was"Mueller said that NO PERSON was involved in COLLUSION with the Russians".
YOUR statement was "Mueller said the opposite".
YOU said it, dorkass!!
ScottMon
I said that Trump wasn't cleared as per Mueller.
Was any charges brought out against Trump?
Why does every argument you get involved in requires you to put words in other people's mouths?
Where did you say that, you lying sack of elephant crap?? I QUOTED YOU EXACTLY and YOU LOST!!
Quit swallowing that Russian disinformation
I lost nothing other than time arguing when you tried to put words in my mouth. You vehemently swore that I actually used the word collusion. That was a lie. Then you tried to play it off like I declared Trump guilty when I stated that he wasn't proven conclusively either way.Beekeeper » 06 Feb 2023, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Where did you say that, you lying sack of elephant crap?? I QUOTED YOU EXACTLY and YOU LOST!!
The feeling is mutual. You're a tool of Russian disinformation.
ScottMon
I lost nothing other than time arguing when you tried to put words in my mouth. You vehemently swore that I actually used the word collusion. That was a lie. Then you tried to play it off like I declared Trump guilty when I stated that he wasn't proven conclusively either way.
Hey willfranklin,
it is all there for people to see
SO what are the EXACT WORDS that YOU RESPONDED TO??ScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I lost nothing other than time arguing when you tried to put words in my mouth. You vehemently swore that I actually used the word collusion. That was a lie. Then you tried to play it off like I declared Trump guilty when I stated that he wasn't proven conclusively either way.
The Report stated that it was inconclusive. Mueller stated the same thing. Now stop putting words in my mouth.Beekeeper » 06 Feb 2023, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ SO what are the EXACT WORDS that YOU RESPONDED TO??
And there was NO discussion of anything OTHER than collusion and no investigation of Hillary. YOUR RESPONSE WAS THAT THE MUELLER REPORT SAID OTHERWISE and there was NOTHING in that report about any Clinton or her paying for ANYTHING!.
Run along now, ARSEHOLE!! You got your ARSE handed to you and you playing semantics is a PURE COP OUT to cover your LYING!!!
https://i.postimg.cc/Jz4tJRRQ/scottmon-collusion.png
ScottMon
The Report stated that it was inconclusive. Mueller stated the same thing. Now stop putting words in my mouth.
Bet you miss your mommas *** in your mouth
There you go again, with your MASSIVE INVENTIONS!!ScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ The Report stated that it was inconclusive. Mueller stated the same thing. Now stop putting words in my mouth.
ScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ The Report stated that it was inconclusive. Mueller stated the same thing. Now stop putting words in my mouth.
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the United States’ 2016 election and did not take a clear position on whether Trump obstructed justice.Beekeeper » 06 Feb 2023, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑ There you go again, with your MASSIVE INVENTIONS!!
Mueller finds no collusion with Russia, leaves obstruction question open
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the United States’ 2016 election and did not take a clear position on whether Trump obstructed justice.
https://www.americanbar.org/news/abanew ... stigation/
ScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the United States’ 2016 election and did not take a clear position on whether Trump obstructed justice.
Inconclusive. How many times do I need to say it to you. Inconclusive.
TOTALLY conclusive, dipweed!!ScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the United States’ 2016 election and did not take a clear position on whether Trump obstructed justice.
Inconclusive. How many times do I need to say it to you. Inconclusive.
That's your opinion. Mueller said it wasn't conclusive.Beekeeper » 06 Feb 2023, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑ TOTALLY conclusive, dipweed!!
The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”
SAME LINK AS ABOVE!!
A **** opinion piece from AP. Damn shilly you really are a retard.ScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑ That's your opinion. Mueller said it wasn't conclusive.
Mueller declares his Russia report did not exonerate Trump | AP News
You're a F'ing IDIOT!!ScottMon » 06 Feb 2023, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑ That's your opinion. Mueller said it wasn't conclusive.
Mueller declares his Russia report did not exonerate Trump | AP News
I see that you don't quite understand. I'll try more crayons. Mueller couldn't prove Trump's involvement conclusively and admitted that It's quite possible that Trump DID collude with Russia.Beekeeper » 06 Feb 2023, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a F'ing IDIOT!!
The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”
DIRECT QUOTE FROM THE MUELLER REPORT!!
SHUT THE F UP, IDIOT ARSEHOLE!!