golfboy » 05 Feb 2023, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Typical liberalism. They have nothing to offer America but fear and scare tactics.
What did they do about Medicare and Socialist Security while they had COMPLETE CONTROL of the government?
Nothing.
They wanted a campaign slogan around which they could get their brain-dead sheep to rally.
peepee » 07 Feb 2023, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
...'social security' involves some illion$ of dollar$...you sir, are a complete butt-ignoramus as to the hideous origin, nature, etc., of even one 'dollar'...you, like the other monetary retards here, need to stfu about 'the illion dollar economy' until you understand the origin and nature of the basic unit of account...iow, stfu, you blatheringmaroon...
![]()
...you remind me of that puppet trump cacksucking monetary ignoramus, 'the duck'... good name for a ducking trumptard such as yourself...FJB » 07 Feb 2023, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑ coming from a **** uneducated chink bastard like you... priceless
peepee » 07 Feb 2023, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑ ...you remind me of that puppet trump cacksucking monetary ignoramus, 'the duck'... good name for a ducking trumptard such as yourself...
Nope, it's not the federal government's job to build a social safety net for its peasants. Let each state develop their own social safety net for their citizens.IkeBana » 07 Feb 2023, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ This country needs to follow the EU model of the governmental social safety net. It's where our tax money should be going. Start by getting rid of 9 of the 11 Aircraft Carrier Strike Groups. We need one for each coast. Then provide appropriate maternity leave like pretty much ever goddamn first world country provides to it's women. Nah...not in this sexist **** country.
You make the mistake of thinking social security is a savings account it is not it is insurance. You apparently don't know what a Ponzi scheme is at all.Warcok » 05 Feb 2023, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Social security is the biggest Ponzi scheme in the world. It needs to be privatized and tied into 401ks or sumthin like that.
IkeBana » 05 Feb 2023, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ "Should Be" from a Republican politician means ****. Since we already know that when one of these seditionists says "will definitely be" means nothing. And McCarthy has nothing. Because he has compromised himself so badly with his own conference in order to get the position, that he is the weakest House Speaker in the history of the Republic.
Go ahead assholes...start **** around with Social Security and Medicare and see what happens in 2024.
IkeBana » 07 Feb 2023, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ This country needs to follow the EU model of the governmental social safety net. It's where our tax money should be going. Start by getting rid of 9 of the 11 Aircraft Carrier Strike Groups. We need one for each coast. Then provide appropriate maternity leave like pretty much ever goddamn first world country provides to it's women. Nah...not in this sexist **** country.
EDC4ALL! » 07 Feb 2023, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ They shouldn't be off the table. I say that Seniors should NOT have to pay taxes on their SS, and anyone under 40 should have their SS withholds increased by 25%.
Warcok » 05 Feb 2023, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Social security is the biggest Ponzi scheme in the world. It needs to be privatized and tied into 401ks or sumthin like that.
It's the same boring claim that leftists make every time they want to force the debt ceiling higher.Huey » 05 Feb 2023, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Let’s see. I am 57. I have been hearing for 40 of those years the GOP is coming for SS. IS this finally the year?
What tactic did the Japanese use to sink US naval vessels: kamikaze aircraft.Taipan » 07 Feb 2023, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Let's build 5 more Aircraft Carriers.
"Walk softly.......and carry a big stick".
President Theodore Roosevelt, 1905.
Xavier_Onassis » 07 Feb 2023, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑ What tactic did the Japanese use to sink US naval vessels: kamikaze aircraft.
What is the modern replacement for a kamikaze: an UNMANNED DRONE.
You can probably take out a carrier costing billions with a couple of well-armed drones and zero casualties.
No pilots to train, no widows and orphans to support.
Aircraft carriers are very expensive,and obsolete.
You want to try that again, in English this time?peepee » 07 Feb 2023, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
...'social security' involves some illion$ of dollar$...you sir, are a complete butt-ignoramus as to the hideous origin, nature, etc., of even one 'dollar'...you, like the other monetary retards here, need to stfu about 'the illion dollar economy' until you understand the origin and nature of the basic unit of account...iow, stfu, you blatheringmaroon...
![]()
The anti-war guys who held his feet to the fire are already getting concession on Ukraine, fruity.
Actually, that's him at his most sensible. It doesn't get better - just worse.
Social security is actually quite sustainable. In fact, it's paid for. There's an enormous trust fund.
Then why are we supplimenting from the general fund every year, and the trustees say it's going to be broke.Cannonpointer » 07 Feb 2023, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Social security is actually quite sustainable. In fact, it's paid for. There's an enormous trust fund.
The war in Ukraine, not so much. It's not paid for. It's not our war. And there's an enormous and justifiable lack of trust.