Lol Boebert is confused about the difference between an interrogator and a witness.roadkill » 10 Feb 2023, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ Lauren Boebert
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZ-5UN_F0Mw
slideman » 11 Feb 2023, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Lol Boebert is confused about the difference between an interrogator and a witness.
She's also confused about the right of the private owner of a platform to ban or not ban whoever they wish.
She attempted to draw a line between the FBI and the decisions made by Twitter executives and failed.
Keep trying Lauren
Nice try but that doesn't fly at all. Twitter is not being accused of breaking a contract with subscribers. They are accused of being influenced by the government to d platform certain individuals. No evidence that the government influenced their decision has been presented.roadkill » 11 Feb 2023, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑ When a platform has an agreement with their customers they are obligated to honor that agreement too...and they did not. It's called false advertising and it's illegal.
Find a better information source slidebot.
So you need to WATCH IT, dogfart, and then you will LEARN SOMETHING about how these 3 people COLLUDED with government to SUPPRESS AND SILENCE the free speech of journalists and others who's SPEECH they didn't like!! AND by their OWN ADMISSION!!slideman » 11 Feb 2023, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ Watch: Former Twitter executives testify before the House Oversight Committee
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/08/watch-f ... ittee.html
Twitter CANNOT COLLUDE WITH GOVERNMENT in deciding WHO to ban and what speech to suppress, perfessor!!! PERIOD!!Xavier_Onassis » 11 Feb 2023, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑ It is impossible for any site such as Twitter to accept absolutely everything someone wants to print. So Twitter has the right to print or refuse to print everything they choose unless it is illegal, which would be promoting murder, insurrection or trying to cause a panic.
Twitter did not break any law by banning Trump.
Yer an uninformed idiot Mr. Useful.slideman » 11 Feb 2023, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Nice try but that doesn't fly at all. Twitter is not being accused of breaking a contract with subscribers. They are accused of being influenced by the government to d platform certain individuals. No evidence that the government influenced their decision has been presented.
Bobert's ravings don't change that.
The dems love idiots like Xavier.Beekeeper » 11 Feb 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Twitter CANNOT COLLUDE WITH GOVERNMENT in deciding WHO to ban and what speech to suppress, perfessor!!! PERIOD!!
THAT'S the part you and your IDIOT CLASS of morons fail to comprehend!!
Still driving that 2014 Subaru Outback you had in 2017??
She needs a Midol.roadkill » 10 Feb 2023, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ Lauren Boebert
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZ-5UN_F0Mw
Misty » 11 Feb 2023, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑ She needs a Midol.
While he was in office The Former Guy tried to get a Tweet by Chrissy Teigen taken down because she called him a ****** *** bitch.
That is the very definition of censorship.
So far these dog and pony shows are backfiring on the MAGA gang big time.
But I'm sure you're not seeing or hearing about how Democrats are owning them in these hearings on your far right fringe 'news' sources.
Misty » 11 Feb 2023, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑ She needs a Midol.
While he was in office The Former Guy tried to get a Tweet by Chrissy Teigen taken down because she called him a ****** *** bitch.
That is the very definition of censorship.
So far these dog and pony shows are backfiring on the MAGA gang big time.
But I'm sure you're not seeing or hearing about how Democrats are owning them in these hearings on your far right fringe 'news' sources.
wanna bet?Mr.7 » 10 Feb 2023, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑ It's all coming together. Boebert, MTG, Jordan and Musk gettin it done. Gonna be some jail time for the ex-twitter exec bitches.
Goldman tried to be cute and axed Jordan about the whistleblowers and Jordan ate him up shut him down and made him look pettyMisty » 11 Feb 2023, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑ She needs a Midol.
While he was in office The Former Guy tried to get a Tweet by Chrissy Teigen taken down because she called him a ****** *** bitch.
That is the very definition of censorship.
So far these dog and pony shows are backfiring on the MAGA gang big time.
But I'm sure you're not seeing or hearing about how Democrats are owning them in these hearings on your far right fringe 'news' sources.
Nah...I don't need any more money. But thanks for the offer.
they won’t do anything to them
Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2023, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑ A woman is someone who wears makeup and colors their hair..
Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2025, 10:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Donald Trump is not a woman, you **** moron.
Try again, jackass.
There's no evidence yer girlfriend colored her hair...Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2023, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑ A woman is someone who wears makeup and colors their hair..
Now it is time for you to answer..
Why do you have to ask?
Are you an idiot?
