Who told you that, you retarded goober?slideman » 13 Feb 2023, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑
The interviews of the social media executives did not go well for the Republicans.
Shut up, queer.nuckinfutz » 13 Feb 2023, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Be soft. Do not let the world make you hard. Do not let the pain make you hate. Do not let the bitterness steal your sweetness. Take pride that even though the rest of the world may disagree, you still believe it to be a beautiful place.Kurt VonnegutFuture generations will look back on TV as the lead in the water pipes that slowly drove the Romans mad.Kurt VonnegutTrue terror is to wake up one morning and discover that your high school class is running the country.Kurt VonnegutI posted a lot of his comments years ago, and Cannon lauded me for it! Now, he would villify me for it!
You cast me out, one of your favorite sons! You will burn in Hell for that!
The First Amendment does not apply to any speech in any private business, social media or otherwise.Vegas » 13 Feb 2023, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑I see that you are trying to redeem yourself after Cannon shoved a 10 ft pole up your *** on this issue. He destroyed you. He murdered you.slideman » 13 Feb 2023, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Does the First Amendment Apply to Social Media Companies?
https://www.talksonlaw.com/briefs/does- ... -all-users
That is blatantly incorrect. Anyone can sue anyone for anything. Now, can you successfully sue those companies for violating your free-speech rights? No.slideman » 13 Feb 2023, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ May I sue Facebook, Twitter, or other social-media companies for violating my First Amendment or free-speech rights?
No!
https://www.chandralaw.com/faqs/may-i-s ... ech-rights
Probably an opinion trying to be passed off as fact.
Only hell that exists is the one you intellectually put yourself in cradle to grave. keep it for yourself. I don't need reasonable doubt in my time evolving forward in plain sight.nuckin futz » 13 Feb 2023, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You cast me out, one of your favorite sons! You will burn in Hell for that! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
*** DICKER! You went from the far left SOCIALIST to the extreme far right which defies all reason!Try to 'splain that?
What if the government is directly involved in the censorship? Kind of a gray area. Yes platforms have the right to censor or deplatform but when they do so, at the behest of government, it gets a little murky.slideman » 13 Feb 2023, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ "So the answer to the question, "Do you have a right not to be kicked off a social media platform?" is no! You have no such right. Many people are shocked to learn that the First Amendment free speech guarantee, along with all constitutional rights, only protects us against the government. So, if the government interferes with your freedom of speech, you can bring a First Amendment lawsuit to challenge that. And that's true whether we're talking about a federal government official or a state or local government official. But guess what? Facebook, Twitter, the other social media platforms are not the government."
Diectly involved how? You **** have been trying to make this case for years. Nothing has ever come of it. It just more **** sniveling with nothing behind it.Neo » 13 Feb 2023, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑ What if the government is directly involved in the censorship? Kind of a gray area. Yes platforms have the right to censor or deplatform but when they do so, at the behest of government, it gets a little murky.
IkeBana » 13 Feb 2023, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Diectly involved how? You **** have been trying to make this case for years. Nothing has ever come of it. It just more **** sniveling with nothing behind it.
So...prove that anybody was booted off of any social media platform on the orders of someone in government. The owner of a platform may agree or disagree with some office holder, but that doesn’t mean someone in government ordered it. The platform management may know that some politician might approve of the management's actions. So what?
IkeBana » 13 Feb 2023, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Diectly involved how? You **** have been trying to make this case for years. Nothing has ever come of it. It just more **** sniveling with nothing behind it.
So...prove that anybody was booted off of any social media platform on the orders of someone in government. The owner of a platform may agree or disagree with some office holder, but that doesn’t mean someone in government ordered it. The platform management may know that some politician might approve of the management's actions. So what?
You went from being a women's rights advocate to being a piece of ****.nuckinfutz » 13 Feb 2023, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑ *** DICKER! You went from the far left SOCIALIST to the extreme far right which defies all reason!Try to 'splain that?![]()
![]()
![]()
And abandoned your Potty Patrol which went after Rethug 'toe tappers' to lusting after 13 year old girls trapped in a shower with you!
![]()
![]()
I defer to your expertise on the subject of men's asses, penis puffer.
When companies/corporations commit what amounts to "redlining" based on political zones instead of geographic zones, it should give everyone pause for thought.slideman » 13 Feb 2023, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Does the First Amendment Apply to Social Media Companies?
https://www.talksonlaw.com/briefs/does- ... -all-users
Sir,Cannonpointer » 13 Feb 2023, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑ I defer to your expertise on the subject of men's asses, penis puffer.
None are so blind as those who refuse to see. Sorry but the media and social networks undisputedly showed their cocks with the Hunter Biden laptop story and Covid. One could argue they were obvious to all with the Iraqi WMD tales, certainly the Ukraine propaganda.IkeBana » 13 Feb 2023, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Diectly involved how? You **** have been trying to make this case for years. Nothing has ever come of it. It just more **** sniveling with nothing behind it.
So...prove that anybody was booted off of any social media platform on the orders of someone in government. The owner of a platform may agree or disagree with some office holder, but that doesn’t mean someone in government ordered it. The platform management may know that some politician might approve of the management's actions. So what?
slideman » 13 Feb 2023, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Does the First Amendment Apply to Social Media Companies?
https://www.talksonlaw.com/briefs/does- ... -all-users
How many ways can one deny now is eternity and everyone plays a role misleading everyone else at the same time each generation added in plain sight?nuckin futz » 13 Feb 2023, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑ *** DICKER! You went from the far left SOCIALIST to the extreme far right which defies all reason!Try to 'splain that? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: And abandoned your Potty Patrol which went after Rethug 'toe tappers' to lusting after 13 year old girls trapped in a shower with you! :lol: :lol: :lol: