Twitter had to change their policy bcuz of whiny conservatives. Ok.
Pastafarian » 14 Feb 2023, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ Twitter had to change their policy bcuz of whiny conservatives. Ok.
Good luck proving it, cum drain.Cannonpointer » 13 Feb 2023, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑ What YOU have to prove is that the big tech companies lying about EVERYTHING and suppressing EVERYTHING, against their own rules - biden's laptop, the fraudulent provenance of the steele dossier, etc. - was just an innocent oopsie doopsie, and not a part of a conspiracy as the emails and other proofs of collusion demonstrate.
Good luck, fool.
Now I’m BV?
Your reality isn't going so well either. Better check that inside out imploding going on, on your one sided mantra.Pastafarian » 14 Feb 2023, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑ Good luck proving it, cum drain.
So far not good for you.
Okay, dick sucker.Taipan » 13 Feb 2023, 9:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Sir,
You made a mistake.
You should have put a period after........"asses".
YOu need to focus on telling the difference between a man and a woman, fruitcake.IkeBana » 14 Feb 2023, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑ Well actually more often his answer is "go suck *** cock." But I will leave it to you cons to determine which is the more deplorable flaccid, limp, and impotent retort.
Learn how to google, you **** shanked moron.
Nice goal post move. Show where I said they do.slideman » 14 Feb 2023, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑The media companies have no responsibility to prove anything to you.
Okay, midwit. I see that tracking information across domains is above your rhesus level.slideman » 14 Feb 2023, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ You spout a lot of **** and then in the end try to turn things on their head.
Keep trying doofus
It was your claim the hobby lobby case proved the opposite.
You have been handed your ***
You don't even make any sense dude. Floundering interspersed with insults.Cannonpointer » 14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Nice goal post move. Show where I said they do.
You are desperately trying to derail the topic AWAY FROM YOUR THESIS, as you sense it has been destroyed. Your THESIS, you hastily retreating skirt flapper, was that these companies have every right to **** can our accounts and limit what people see. You ran from another thread (of YOURS) wherein I made the case that they had abused their authorities. And you came over here and started your Citizens United inspired apologia for corporate fiat.
It has never been about face book owing me anything, boy - I don't even do that ****. My social media is the NHB. Anyone I want to see from 40 years ago, I will track down.
Okay, midwit. I see that tracking information across domains is above your rhesus level.
Hobby Lobby distinguished between the duties of publicly traded companies to hew to public policy and privately held ones to do so.
I get that Hobby Lobby does NOT do that within your meager capacity to comprehend. Doesn't change ****, fruit.
Here's a thought, weakness. If you're going to go to the trouble to start a second thread to rescue yourself from the *** whipping in a previous thread, try rully rully hard to follow and respond to the arguments.
Ah, jeez - another monkey on board the fruitville express.Pastafarian » 14 Feb 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ They gave Biden the same privilege Trump was given.
Twitter changed their policy to accommodate Trump after he broke their terms.
where are stationary goals posts when evolving doesn't leave anything the same results twice? Rhetocial question because I have a score for inorganic and another score for ancestral lineages.Cannonpointer » 14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Nice goal post move. Show where I said they do.
You are desperately trying to derail the topic AWAY FROM YOUR THESIS, as you sense it has been destroyed. Your THESIS, you hastily retreating skirt flapper, was that these companies have every right to **** can our accounts and limit what people see. You ran from another thread (of YOURS) wherein I made the case that they had abused their authorities. And you came over here and started your Citizens United inspired apologia for corporate fiat.
It has never been about face book owing me anything, boy - I don't even do that ****. My social media is the NHB. Anyone I want to see from 40 years ago, I will track down.
Okay, midwit. I see that tracking information across domains is above your rhesus level.
Hobby Lobby distinguished between the duties of publicly traded companies to hew to public policy and privately held ones to do so.
I get that Hobby Lobby does NOT do that within your meager capacity to comprehend. Doesn't change ****, fruit.
Here's a thought, weakness. If you're going to go to the trouble to start a second thread to rescue yourself from the *** whipping in a previous thread, try rully rully hard to follow and respond to the arguments.
Thanks for the recipe idea, weakness. Flounder with Insults. Be watching for that on the Dick's Last Resort menu.slideman » 14 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑ You don't even make any sense dude. Floundering interspersed with insults.
You win, you're done - in your own thread.slideman » 14 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑ You have been handed your *** and you can't stand it oh well I'm done with you.
So you are for censorship...slideman » 13 Feb 2023, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Does the First Amendment Apply to Social Media Companies?
https://www.talksonlaw.com/briefs/does- ... -all-users
This is relevant that’s why you don’t want any part of it, cum drain.Cannonpointer » 14 Feb 2023, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Ah, jeez - another monkey on board the fruitville express.
You're bringing your fart nuggets to a thread that is a reaction to an *** whipping. Try to assess the relevant contexts.
Here's a hint - it has nothing to do with trump getting kicked off twitter. Hell, I would have kicked his *** off twitter - he violated their TOS daily, Delanamore.
Okay, planet of the apes.Pastafarian » 14 Feb 2023, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ This is relevant that’s why you don’t want any part of it, cum drain.
You talk about Twitter violating their own policies, this is one that is plain to see. Your claims so far have produced nothing. So it’s either, you are lying or your people cannot conduct an investigation asking the right questions.
^^^^when you can’t attack the argument attack your opponent.Cannonpointer » 14 Feb 2023, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay, planet of the apes.
We watched different hears. I can't make your IQ higher. All I can do is make sport of how low it is.
That's from the sally allyoinky playbook, I believe...Pastafarian » 14 Feb 2023, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ when you can’t attack the argument attack your opponent.
Cannonpointer » 14 Feb 2023, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay, dick sucker.
Asses.
The thing you focus on most.
Cannon Peckerhead generates traffic purely by INSULTING his members!slideman » 14 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑ You don't even make any sense dude. Floundering interspersed with insults.
You have been handed your *** and you can't stand it oh well I'm done with you.