Pastafarian » 14 Feb 2023, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ Then why must people stand for “America tge beautiful” as well?
Darn those uppity ******. Calling attention to discrimination inequality and prejudice in our society how dare they?Selaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ There I am in my house standing and saluting and Collin has the nerve to take a knee.
A knee to protest because he could not stand to show pride in the flag of a country that oppressed black people.
DON'T STAND, STAY SEATED
Yeah, there is.Mrkelly » 14 Feb 2023, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ There is nothing that “requires” that you stand for the national anthem either
Skans » 14 Feb 2023, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ America The Beautiful is not the national anthem. No one cares if you stand or sit for it. There is but one national anthem - The Star Spangled Banner. Stand for it, or be ridiculed and labeled anti-American by real Americans.
They got your attention and that seems to be the goal so how is it the wrong venue?
The problem you have here is that you only make a vapid claim and offer NOTHING to back it up!! So show us where all this discrimination, prejudice and inequality is so much in desperate need of protests!!slideman » 14 Feb 2023, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ They got your attention and that seems to be the goal so how is it the wrong venue?
Somehow when black people protest against discrimination prejudice and inequality it's always the wrong venue
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UvC4xq32AX8
Beekeeper » 14 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, there is.
36 U.S. Code § 301 - National anthem
(a) Designation.—The composition consisting of the words and music known as the Star-Spangled Banner is the national anthem.
(b) Conduct During Playing.—During a rendition of the national anthem—
(1) when the flag is displayed—
(A)individuals in uniform should give the military salute at the first note of the anthem and maintain that position until the last note;
(B)members of the Armed Forces and veterans who are present but not in uniform may render the military salute in the manner provided for individuals in uniform; and
(C)all other persons present should face the flag and stand at attention with their right hand over the heart, and men not in uniform, if applicable, should remove their headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart; and
(2)when the flag is not displayed, all present should face toward the music and act in the same manner they would if the flag were displayed.(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1263; Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title V, § 595, Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4475.)
Selaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ I DO NOT GIVE A **** ABOUT ANY EX GREEN BERET SUGGESTS!
I DECIDE! AND I DECIDED TO SMASH THE TELEVISON AND NOT WATCH TELEVISION AGAIN
ONCE AGAIN **** WHAT THE GREEN BERET SAYS!
YOU ARE TELLING ME THAT I SHOULD CONSIDER WHAT THE GREEN BERET SAYS?
GOD DAMN SON YOU ARE STUPID!
Just a suggestion is all 36 U.S. Code § 301 is.... .... exactly why you can burn a flag, wear it or do anything else you want to do with it.....only punishable by UCMJ...which is active duty.Beekeeper » 14 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, there is.
36 U.S. Code § 301 - National anthem
(a) Designation.—The composition consisting of the words and music known as the Star-Spangled Banner is the national anthem.
(b) Conduct During Playing.—During a rendition of the national anthem—
(1) when the flag is displayed—
(A)individuals in uniform should give the military salute at the first note of the anthem and maintain that position until the last note;
(B)members of the Armed Forces and veterans who are present but not in uniform may render the military salute in the manner provided for individuals in uniform; and
(C)all other persons present should face the flag and stand at attention with their right hand over the heart, and men not in uniform, if applicable, should remove their headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart; and
(2)when the flag is not displayed, all present should face toward the music and act in the same manner they would if the flag were displayed.(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1263; Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title V, § 595, Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4475.)
I might get to decide. If I'm their employer, I can legally prevent the from conducting protest "on the clock" and keep them from protesting on my property.Mrkelly » 14 Feb 2023, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑
you don’t get to decide how and when someone peacefully protests
https://youtu.be/ma6gSKDZtq0
yesSelaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Would you consider Burning a Flag, disrespectful (regardless of legality)?
@Mrkelly
two wrongs establish human rights to never accept life for all it actually does in plain sight.ConsRule » 14 Feb 2023, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I might get to decide. If I'm their employer, I can legally prevent the from conducting protest "on the clock" and keep them from protesting on my property.
However, I think you were referring to the generic "you"...and you are correct. However, they don't get to decide how I interpret their protest or how I react to it. And the exact same thing that gives them the right to protest, gives me the right to call them an unpatriotic idiot as loud and as often as I choose.
Not always. The proper method for disposing of a worn or tattered flag is for it to be destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by burning.Selaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Would you consider Burning a Flag, disrespectful (regardless of legality)?
@Mrkelly
I have burned many a flags, none out of disrespect, but because it is the preferred method.Selaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Would you consider Burning a Flag, disrespectful (regardless of legality)?
@Mrkelly
No.Selaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ If a Green Beret told you that it is OK to burn a flag, would it change your mind?
it IS OK to burn a flagSelaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ If a Green Beret told you that it is OK to burn a flag, would it change your mind?
No, but I do get to decide when I'm extremely offended by disrespectful punks that have everything on a silver spoon and feel the need to spout off **** on how oppressed they are. I do get to decide to boycott any companies that promote or enable rich punks that have no respect for the country that enabled them to get stinking rich. In many lefty/socialist/communist countries around the world, Craponick would be ridiculed, hounded, and possibly jailed or worse for disrespecting their Anthem/Country.Mrkelly » 14 Feb 2023, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ How about the ex green beret that suggested that kaepernick take a knee instead of setting on the bench?
you don’t get to decide how and when someone peacefully protests
https://youtu.be/ma6gSKDZtq0
who the hell said that you couldn’t “make a decision based on action”?Selaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ What you don't get is I CAN MAKE A DECISION BASED ON ACTION
I don't care if it is OK to burn a flag. I don't care if a Green Beret told Collin to take a knee.
I don't care if @Mr. 7 or @ConsRule agree or disagree that it is OK to burn a flag.
It is their OPINION (and some law as well). I do not disrespect them for that.
Collin Kaepernick took a knee and in my opinion that was disrespectful based on ACTION.
I MADE A DECISION BASED ON ACTION
YOU DON'T GET THAT CONCEPT, DO YOU?
I CAN AND DO RESPECT THE TROOPS AND ALL OF THOSE THAT SERVED AND DIED.
I HOLD NO GRUDGE AGAINST A GREEN BERET BASED ON THE ACTION THAT COLLIN TOOK.
who said that you weren’t?EDC4ALL! » 14 Feb 2023, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ No, but I do get to decide when I'm extremely offended by disrespectful punks that have everything on a silver spoon and feel the need to spout off **** on how oppressed they are. I do get to decide to boycott any companies that promote or enable rich punks that have no respect for the country that enabled them to get stinking rich. In many lefty/socialist/communist countries around the world, Craponick would be ridiculed, hounded, and possibly jailed or worse for disrespecting their Anthem/Country.