If only one anthem should be sung at the Super Bowl

User avatar
By Pastafarian
14 Feb 2023 9:37 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2 3 4 5 6
User avatar
Huey
14 Feb 2023 10:56 am
User avatar
      
36,106 posts
Pastafarian » 14 Feb 2023, 10:37 am » wrote: Then why must people stand for “America tge beautiful” as well?

Stand, don't stand.  Who is really affected by this...
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
slideman
14 Feb 2023 10:57 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
801 posts
Selaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 11:55 am » wrote: There I am in my house standing and saluting and Collin has the nerve to take a knee.

A knee to protest because he could not stand to show pride in the flag of a country that oppressed black people.

DON'T STAND, STAY SEATED
Darn those uppity ******. Calling attention to discrimination inequality and prejudice in our society how dare they?
User avatar
Huey
14 Feb 2023 11:00 am
User avatar
      
36,106 posts

Circumstances were a little bit different.  
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Beekeeper
14 Feb 2023 11:00 am
User avatar
      
10,054 posts
Mrkelly » 14 Feb 2023, 11:05 am » wrote: There is nothing that “requires” that you stand for the national anthem either
Yeah, there is.

36 U.S. Code § 301 - National anthem 

(a) Designation.—The composition consisting of the words and music known as the Star-Spangled Banner is the national anthem.
(b) Conduct During Playing.—During a rendition of the national anthem—

(1) when the flag is displayed—

(A)individuals in uniform should give the military salute at the first note of the anthem and maintain that position until the last note;
(B)members of the Armed Forces and veterans who are present but not in uniform may render the military salute in the manner provided for individuals in uniform; and
(C)all other persons present should face the flag and stand at attention with their right hand over the heart, and men not in uniform, if applicable, should remove their headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart; and

(2)when the flag is not displayed, all present should face toward the music and act in the same manner they would if the flag were displayed.(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1263; Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title V, § 595, Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4475.)
 
 
 
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
User avatar
EDC4ALL!
14 Feb 2023 11:01 am
User avatar
   
1,098 posts
Skans » 14 Feb 2023, 11:33 am » wrote: America The Beautiful is not the national anthem.  No one cares if you stand or sit for it.  There is but one national anthem - The Star Spangled Banner.  Stand for it, or be ridiculed and labeled anti-American by real Americans.

And here I was led to believe that lefties wanted to be like all these other countries...liberals are stoooooopid.

https://scroll.in/article/683189/stand- ... -the-issue

https://globalsportmatters.com/culture/ ... -the-same/
User avatar
slideman
14 Feb 2023 11:04 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
801 posts
They got your attention and that seems to be the goal so how is it the wrong venue?
Somehow when black people protest against discrimination prejudice and inequality it's always the wrong venue

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UvC4xq32AX8
User avatar
Beekeeper
14 Feb 2023 11:10 am
User avatar
      
10,054 posts
slideman » 14 Feb 2023, 12:04 pm » wrote: They got your attention and that seems to be the goal so how is it the wrong venue?
Somehow when black people protest against discrimination prejudice and inequality it's always the wrong venue

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UvC4xq32AX8
The problem you have here is that you only make a vapid claim and offer NOTHING to back it up!! So show us where all this discrimination, prejudice and inequality is so much in desperate need of protests!!

That should be EASY to find DOCUMENTED cases that are in such massive numbers that you have those right at the tip of your fingers if you made such a claim!!

Now GO!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
User avatar
Mrkelly
14 Feb 2023 11:11 am
User avatar
      
9,421 posts
Beekeeper » 14 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm » wrote: Yeah, there is.

36 U.S. Code § 301 - National anthem 

(a) Designation.—The composition consisting of the words and music known as the Star-Spangled Banner is the national anthem.
(b) Conduct During Playing.—During a rendition of the national anthem—

(1) when the flag is displayed—

(A)individuals in uniform should give the military salute at the first note of the anthem and maintain that position until the last note;
(B)members of the Armed Forces and veterans who are present but not in uniform may render the military salute in the manner provided for individuals in uniform; and
(C)all other persons present should face the flag and stand at attention with their right hand over the heart, and men not in uniform, if applicable, should remove their headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart; and

(2)when the flag is not displayed, all present should face toward the music and act in the same manner they would if the flag were displayed.(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1263; Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title V, § 595, Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4475.)
:LOL:  Where does it say “required “?
 
Image
User avatar
Mrkelly
14 Feb 2023 11:12 am
User avatar
      
9,421 posts
Selaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 11:46 am » wrote: I DO NOT GIVE A **** ABOUT ANY EX GREEN BERET SUGGESTS!
I DECIDE! AND I DECIDED TO SMASH THE TELEVISON AND NOT WATCH TELEVISION AGAIN

ONCE AGAIN **** WHAT THE GREEN BERET SAYS! 

YOU ARE TELLING ME THAT I SHOULD CONSIDER WHAT THE GREEN BERET SAYS?
GOD DAMN SON YOU ARE STUPID!
:LOL:  But but … respect the troops right?  :LOL:  
Image
User avatar
MR-7
14 Feb 2023 11:16 am
User avatar
      
7,589 posts
Beekeeper » 14 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm » wrote: Yeah, there is.

36 U.S. Code § 301 - National anthem 

(a) Designation.—The composition consisting of the words and music known as the Star-Spangled Banner is the national anthem.
(b) Conduct During Playing.—During a rendition of the national anthem—

(1) when the flag is displayed—

(A)individuals in uniform should give the military salute at the first note of the anthem and maintain that position until the last note;
(B)members of the Armed Forces and veterans who are present but not in uniform may render the military salute in the manner provided for individuals in uniform; and
(C)all other persons present should face the flag and stand at attention with their right hand over the heart, and men not in uniform, if applicable, should remove their headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart; and

(2)when the flag is not displayed, all present should face toward the music and act in the same manner they would if the flag were displayed.(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1263; Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title V, § 595, Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4475.)
Just a suggestion is all 36 U.S. Code § 301 is.... .... exactly why you can burn a flag, wear it or do anything else you want to do with it.....only punishable by UCMJ...which is active duty. 
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year. :lol:
User avatar
ConsRule
14 Feb 2023 11:17 am
User avatar
     
3,376 posts
Mrkelly » 14 Feb 2023, 11:40 am » wrote:
you don’t get to decide how and when someone peacefully protests

https://youtu.be/ma6gSKDZtq0
I might get to decide.  If I'm their employer, I can legally prevent the from conducting protest "on the clock" and keep them from protesting on my property.

However, I think you were referring to the generic "you"...and you are correct.  However, they don't get to decide how I interpret their protest or how I react to it.  And the exact same thing that gives them the right to protest, gives me the right to call them an unpatriotic idiot as loud and as often as I choose.
 
 
User avatar
Mrkelly
14 Feb 2023 11:19 am
User avatar
      
9,421 posts
Selaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 12:18 pm » wrote: Would you consider Burning a Flag, disrespectful (regardless of legality)?

@Mrkelly
yes
Image
User avatar
sole
14 Feb 2023 11:21 am
User avatar
      
27,042 posts
ConsRule » 14 Feb 2023, 12:17 pm » wrote: I might get to decide.  If I'm their employer, I can legally prevent the from conducting protest "on the clock" and keep them from protesting on my property.

However, I think you were referring to the generic "you"...and you are correct.  However, they don't get to decide how I interpret their protest or how I react to it.  And the exact same thing that gives them the right to protest, gives me the right to call them an unpatriotic idiot as loud and as often as I choose.
 
 
two wrongs establish human rights to never accept life for all it actually does in plain sight.
User avatar
ConsRule
14 Feb 2023 11:24 am
User avatar
     
3,376 posts
Selaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 12:18 pm » wrote: Would you consider Burning a Flag, disrespectful (regardless of legality)?

@Mrkelly
Not always.  The proper method for disposing of a worn or tattered flag is for it to be destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by burning.
 
User avatar
MR-7
14 Feb 2023 11:25 am
User avatar
      
7,589 posts
Selaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 12:18 pm » wrote: Would you consider Burning a Flag, disrespectful (regardless of legality)?

@Mrkelly
I have burned many a flags, none out of disrespect, but because it is the preferred method.
  1. How to Properly Dispose of an American Flaghttps://nationalflagfoundation.org/etiquette/how...
    • How to Dispose of a Flag
      • Burning a Flag. The first way to dispose of an American Flag is to hold a Flag burning …
      • Community Disposal Box. A second way to dispose of an American Flag is to drop it off in a …
      • Burying a Flag. Although the U.S. Code says that burning is the preferred method to dispose …
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year. :lol:
User avatar
sole
14 Feb 2023 11:26 am
User avatar
      
27,042 posts
Selaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm » wrote: If a Green Beret told you that it is OK to burn a flag, would it change your mind?
 
 
No.
User avatar
Mrkelly
14 Feb 2023 11:26 am
User avatar
      
9,421 posts
Selaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm » wrote: If a Green Beret told you that it is OK to burn a flag, would it change your mind?
it IS OK to burn a flag

what the hell are you talking about?

why do you hate the troops?
Image
User avatar
EDC4ALL!
14 Feb 2023 11:43 am
User avatar
   
1,098 posts
Mrkelly » 14 Feb 2023, 11:40 am » wrote: How about the ex green beret that suggested that kaepernick take a knee instead of setting on the bench?

you don’t get to decide how and when someone peacefully protests

https://youtu.be/ma6gSKDZtq0
No, but I do get to decide when I'm extremely offended by disrespectful punks that have everything on a silver spoon and feel the need to spout off **** on how oppressed they are. I do get to decide to boycott any companies that promote or enable rich punks that have no respect for the country that enabled them to get stinking rich. In many lefty/socialist/communist countries around the world, Craponick would be ridiculed, hounded, and possibly jailed or worse for disrespecting their Anthem/Country.
 
User avatar
Mrkelly
14 Feb 2023 11:43 am
User avatar
      
9,421 posts
Selaphobia » 14 Feb 2023, 12:39 pm » wrote: What you don't get is I CAN MAKE A DECISION BASED ON ACTION

I don't care if it is OK to burn a flag. I don't care if a Green Beret told Collin to take a knee.
I don't care if @Mr. 7  or @ConsRule    agree or disagree that it is OK to burn a flag.

It is their OPINION (and some law as well). I do not disrespect them for that.

Collin Kaepernick took a knee and in my opinion that was disrespectful based on ACTION.

I MADE A DECISION BASED ON ACTION

YOU DON'T GET THAT CONCEPT, DO YOU?

I CAN AND DO RESPECT THE TROOPS AND ALL OF THOSE THAT SERVED AND DIED.
I HOLD NO GRUDGE AGAINST A GREEN BERET BASED ON THE ACTION THAT COLLIN TOOK.
who the hell said that you couldn’t “make a decision based on action”?

you are just ranting now Karen
Image
User avatar
Mrkelly
14 Feb 2023 11:44 am
User avatar
      
9,421 posts
EDC4ALL! » 14 Feb 2023, 12:43 pm » wrote: No, but I do get to decide when I'm extremely offended by disrespectful punks that have everything on a silver spoon and feel the need to spout off **** on how oppressed they are. I do get to decide to boycott any companies that promote or enable rich punks that have no respect for the country that enabled them to get stinking rich. In many lefty/socialist/communist countries around the world, Craponick would be ridiculed, hounded, and possibly jailed or worse for disrespecting their Anthem/Country.
who said that you weren’t?
Image
1 2 3 4 5 6

Who is online

In total there are 5413 users online :: 5 registered, 16 bots, and 5392 guests
Bots: LCC, coccocbot, DuckDuckGo, ADmantX, okhttp, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, YandexBot, MicroMessenger, CriteoBot, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, Baiduspider, Applebot, bingbot, curl/7
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search