It's pretty much common knowledge at this point.....https://jacobin.com/2023/02/seymour-her ... m-pipelinePastorBlast » 25 Feb 2023, 3:34 am » wrote: ↑ I am hearing a lot of chatter on the question. If we did, we should face the consequences for our crime.
A search of the OP title doesn't turn up any credible links worrh sharing.
We are almost through the winter and tens of thousands of Germans haven't froze to death or are starving to stay warm. Global warming has kept Europe anomolously warm fortunately.
Thanks in advance for sharing any comments or information on the question.
Str8tEdge » 25 Feb 2023, 10:56 pm » wrote: ↑ It's pretty much common knowledge at this point.....https://jacobin.com/2023/02/seymour-her ... m-pipeline
Seymour Hersh: The US Destroyed the Nord Stream PipelineAn interview withSeymour Hersh Last week, renowned investigative reporter Seymour Hersh published an article claiming that the US was responsible for the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline transporting natural gas to Germany from Russia. He spoke to Jacobin about the allegations.
Probably because the search engine you're using is controlled by the government. Try different search engines.
You really don't believe Biden blew up the Nordstream?
I don't even see that as an honest question, as it implies that anyone else had motive, means and opportunity.PastorBlast » 25 Feb 2023, 3:34 am » wrote: ↑ I am hearing a lot of chatter on the question. If we did, we should face the consequences for our crime.
A search of the OP title doesn't turn up any credible links worrh sharing.
We are almost through the winter and tens of thousands of Germans haven't froze to death or are starving to stay warm. Global warming has kept Europe anomolously warm fortunately.
Thanks in advance for sharing any comments or information on the question.
To me, even suggesting that anyone else did it is either dishonest or extremely ignorant - downright stupid, really.HotblackDesiato » 25 Feb 2023, 4:27 am » wrote: ↑ Who else would blow it up? For Russia, Nordstream was an effective tactical weapon in this conflict, which was causing increasingly visible cracks to form in the united front against Russia. It was also their infrastructure and their product that bubbled away in to the atmosphere. Its destruction has had nothing but negative consequences for them. The west blew up Nordstream, because there's no point in your citizens rioting about getting a gas pipeline switched back on if it doesn't exist any more - irrespective of how many of you are freezing to death.
We blew up Nordstream.. I'm amazed we have the brass neck to try and blame Russia - and even more amazed we're getting away with it. Why bother waiting for evidence with a US flag on it - it's bloody obvious what happened
Because the one thing we all know is that no attempt has ever been made to limit what you get to hear.PastorBlast » 25 Feb 2023, 4:36 am » wrote: ↑ We didn't hear much about freezing to death or even increased energy costs.
Poland is sending in tanks and missiles to kill russian troops.slideman » 25 Feb 2023, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ Medvedev is making noises about taking territory from Poland are you sure about what you're saying? It seems contravened by the facts.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/senior-ru ... an-nations
HotblackDesiato » 25 Feb 2023, 4:27 am » wrote: ↑ Who else would blow it up? For Russia, Nordstream was an effective tactical weapon in this conflict, which was causing increasingly visible cracks to form in the united front against Russia. It was also their infrastructure and their product that bubbled away in to the atmosphere. Its destruction has had nothing but negative consequences for them. The west blew up Nordstream, because there's no point in your citizens rioting about getting a gas pipeline switched back on if it doesn't exist any more - irrespective of how many of you are freezing to death.
We blew up Nordstream.. I'm amazed we have the brass neck to try and blame Russia - and even more amazed we're getting away with it. Why bother waiting for evidence with a US flag on it - it's bloody obvious what happened
Why leave out trump? You can't bring yourself, fruitcake?Xavier_Onassis » 25 Feb 2023, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Politicians are aware that it is wise that they project their personalities as being just crazy enough to do something rash, like Dropping The Big One. Nixon did this, Reagan also did this, and now Putin is emulating them.
Make regular, concerted efforts not to be a gay homosexual.
That's why they gave Trump so much money and told Brandon to fly a kite.PastorBlast » 25 Feb 2023, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah
Big Burn Baby Burn Corporation loves them some Trump
This was Gazprom's pipeline network in 2019Xavier_Onassis » 25 Feb 2023, 7:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Gas is not boxed up. Large quantities, which is the subject here, are either delivered by pipeline or by supertanker.
Iran has no need of natural gas. It sell it to India would require either a pipeline or some huge seaport facilities to load it onto ships in Russia (where? Sakhalen Island? Vladivostok?) and one or more seaports to offload it to India.
I do not think Russia has any gas tankers of the size required.
I suggest a pipeline from anywhere Russia has gas available across the Himalayas to India is impossible.
The Nordstream 1 is still functional and still carrying russian gas to german customers.Xavier_Onassis » 25 Feb 2023, 7:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Gas is not boxed up. Large quantities, which is the subject here, are either delivered by pipeline or by supertanker.
Iran has no need of natural gas. It sell it to India would require either a pipeline or some huge seaport facilities to load it onto ships in Russia (where? Sakhalen Island? Vladivostok?) and one or more seaports to offload it to India.
I do not think Russia has any gas tankers of the size required.
I suggest a pipeline from anywhere Russia has gas available across the Himalayas to India is impossible.
The gay homosexual community requires a communique from Brandon, or they have room for denial.Str8tEdge » 25 Feb 2023, 10:56 pm » wrote: ↑ It's pretty much common knowledge at this point.....https://jacobin.com/2023/02/seymour-her ... m-pipeline
Seymour Hersh: The US Destroyed the Nord Stream PipelineAn interview withSeymour Hersh Last week, renowned investigative reporter Seymour Hersh published an article claiming that the US was responsible for the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline transporting natural gas to Germany from Russia. He spoke to Jacobin about the allegations.
Cannonpointer » 26 Feb 2023, 12:29 am » wrote: ↑ The gay homosexual community requires a communique from Brandon, or they have room for denial.
Also, Brandon promised to destroy the pipeline if russia invaded ukraine - see FOS's vid.Str8tEdge » 25 Feb 2023, 10:56 pm » wrote: ↑ It's pretty much common knowledge at this point.....https://jacobin.com/2023/02/seymour-her ... m-pipeline
Seymour Hersh: The US Destroyed the Nord Stream PipelineAn interview withSeymour Hersh Last week, renowned investigative reporter Seymour Hersh published an article claiming that the US was responsible for the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline transporting natural gas to Germany from Russia. He spoke to Jacobin about the allegations.
You've now been shown a video of Brandon promising to shut down the nordstream 2. See FOS's post.
Of course, that should have been the first dots to be connected but....the state ran MSM had to desperately try and deflect from their illegal and immoral acts, providing cover for Biden.Cannonpointer » 26 Feb 2023, 12:36 am » wrote: ↑ Also, Brandon promised to destroy the pipeline if russia invaded ukraine - see FOS's vid.
From his own mouth.