No.Mrkelly » 06 Mar 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ With all the talk about the lefty’s being devil like
would you be in favor of our government becoming a theocracy?
a government that rules solely on the teachings of the Bible?
just wondering
We currently have a government that rules by the Cult of Climate Change and Social Justice now, so what's the difference?Mrkelly » 06 Mar 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ With all the talk about the lefty’s being devil like
would you be in favor of our government becoming a theocracy?
a government that rules solely on the teachings of the Bible?
just wondering
Not a theocracy in the least, cult like is differentRedheadedStranger » 06 Mar 2023, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑ We currently have a government that rules by the Cult of Climate Change and Social Justice now, so what's the difference?
Every move the last Congress and the Biden Admin made in the last two years (other that spending billions on a proxy war in Ukraine) has had something to do with either MMGW or Social Justice.
Even the Dems admit that the "Inflation Reduction Act" was really just an amended version of the Green New Deal... and that was Biden's signature legislation.
Theocracy? Yeah... we already got one.
As for me, no. Theocracies are dangerous... and besides, our Constitution, as written, doesn't allow them.Mrkelly » 06 Mar 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ With all the talk about the lefty’s being devil like
would you be in favor of our government becoming a theocracy?
a government that rules solely on the teachings of the Bible?
just wondering
That’s why the first amendment(religious clause)exists in the first place.Mrkelly » 06 Mar 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ With all the talk about the lefty’s being devil like
would you be in favor of our government becoming a theocracy?
a government that rules solely on the teachings of the Bible?
just wondering
you aids is spreadingMrkelly » 06 Mar 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ With all the talk about the lefty’s being devil like
would you be in favor of our government becoming a theocracy?
a government that rules solely on the teachings of the Bible?
just wondering
you are now scared of dying because of your aids hence your need for the almightyMrkelly » 06 Mar 2023, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Not a theocracy in the least, cult like is different
we will change the next time republicans get control, they will cut regulations, start the wars that they support and cut taxes for the oligarchs.. cult like
a theocracy is permanent, it is not subject to change when the powers that be change
i was just curious if people on the right would really want to go that far
The Amish have adapted an interpretation of the Bible to rural German life in the mid-1800's and being as no one drafts them into armies or attacks them, they do well in the US, as well as in Paraguay, Brazil and Belize.SJConspirator » 06 Mar 2023, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑ A Christian theocracy would be okay. Every Amish village is basically governed as such, and they do fine
Xavier_Onassis » 06 Mar 2023, 7:56 pm » wrote: ↑ The Amish have adapted an interpretation of the Bible to rural German life in the mid-1800's and being as no one drafts them into armies or attacks them, they do well in the US, as well as in Paraguay, Brazil and Belize.
Xavier_Onassis » 06 Mar 2023, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑ The closest thing to a theocracy was probably Florence during 1494 t0 1498 when Girolamo Savanarola took charge. The period was known as the "Bonfire of the Vanities". Eventually, the Pope and others grew tired of Savalarola and burned him and a couple of his colleagues. It is said that it took three hours to incinerate him.
I would say something, but @nefarious101 would think I am picking on you
which church would make the rules?SJConspirator » 06 Mar 2023, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑ A Christian theocracy would be okay. Every Amish village is basically governed as such, and they do fine
The Muslims already have a legal system, Sharia Law. That might be the most practical choice.Mrkelly » 07 Mar 2023, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ which church would make the rules?
Catholic, Presbyterian, maybe some good old southern Baptist.?
Saudi Arabia, Iran are theocraciesXavier_Onassis » 06 Mar 2023, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑ The closest thing to a theocracy was probably Florence during 1494 t0 1498 when Girolamo Savanarola took charge. The period was known as the "Bonfire of the Vanities". Eventually, the Pope and others grew tired of Savalarola and burned him and a couple of his colleagues. It is said that it took three hours to incinerate him.
What we have now is a Bureaucratic Dictatorship. I might prefer a theocracy over the bloated, self-entitled bureaucracy that plagues this country at this very moment.Mrkelly » 06 Mar 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ With all the talk about the lefty’s being devil like
would you be in favor of our government becoming a theocracy?
a government that rules solely on the teachings of the Bible?
just wondering
How about a govenment that doesn't represent misdirection of evolving in plain sight?Mrkelly » 06 Mar 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ With all the talk about the lefty’s being devil like
would you be in favor of our government becoming a theocracy?
a government that rules solely on the teachings of the Bible?
just wondering