If it fails at Level 1, I'm done.Vegas » 08 Mar 2023, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, just what I thought. You are too stupid to provide level 2+
QED.
I can't recall a truer statement on this forum.Vegas » 08 Mar 2023, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑
You are too stupid to see level 2+ when it slaps you in the face.
the reality will fail top down regardless which level. peak to base same as humanity has done inside out since dawn of civilization..
"Doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.". I have seen that define something before.Vegas » 08 Mar 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ He proves himself as an incompetent ******* daily. His ego far exceeds his IQ.
He is predictable, I have 100% accuracy on what he says in upcoming comments.
Here watch, if he is reading this, his response will be: "Post your thoughts!"
I always reply with the challenge that I offered him, he always lies in return.
Repeat and repeat....
Xavier_Onassis » 08 Mar 2023, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑ NASA had the best engineers and were under the same technology as SpaceX. How come NASA couldn't figure it out?
SpaceX surely has a large number of former NASA employees working for them
The problem with NASA is likely the same as with complicated weapons: NASA is obligated to spread the jobs around, so that some parts are made in this congressman;s district, those are made in this other guy's district. Spacex is not required to do this.
NASA is under much less pressure to keep prices down. And until Spacex came along, all big rocket jobs were given through NASA.
Of course, technology has advanced since the first space shots, especially due to more and more government and private satellite launches.
Technology learned at one job can be applied to future jobs.
In regards to Mars Vegas is agreeing with Skans. That if NASA did not become a "bloated bureaucracy, more worried about sustaining their funding than actually achieving"...which led to the Shuttle Program they could have focused on Mars and beyond and the technology TODAY would be more advanced.
To bray, uninformed, in an effort to sound informed.
Blackvegetable » 08 Mar 2023, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑
This is a reflection of your eager credulity, the quality that endears you to influencers and their sponsors.
Blackvegetable » 08 Mar 2023, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑ To bray, uninformed, in an effort to sound informed.
Skans does it all the time. Impresses the **** out of imbeciles like you and @Vegas ....
This is a reflection of your eager credulity, the quality that endears you to influencers and their sponsors.
You lie.
Don't, vegas....Vegas » 08 Mar 2023, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
@Huey you have triggered him. He always talks like this after he gets owned.
Veghead, your immutable ineptitude in profound cognitive prowess has left your critical thinking skills impotent and mentally stupefied to all attempts to inculcate you to a comprehensive and cross-disciplinary conceptual framework required for level 2+ cogitation.
Blackvegetable » 08 Mar 2023, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't, vegas....
you struggle with monosyllabics....
Show me one of yours..Vegas » 08 Mar 2023, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Like I would expect you to understand a word of that. You can't even provide a level 2 thought.
Here we go again: Challenge.
Blackvegetable » 08 Mar 2023, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't, vegas....
you struggle with monosyllabics....