Except these women were not that.Neo » 09 Mar 2023, 10:26 pm » wrote: ↑ My heart bleeds for concentration camp **** unable to rightfully kill their infant Jews.
And the thing to remember is, "fly to Colorado" is not an option for literally millions of poor texans. If this had happened to a woman of a different socio-economic demo, SHE WOULD HAVE DIED.Misty » 09 Mar 2023, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑ One of these women was denied an abortion after her water broke at 19 weeks — too early for the fetus to survive.
Fearing the prospect of severe infection, she had to fly to Colorado for a termination.
Four of these five women had to go to another state to seek care for their medically complex pregnancies.
Somebody is going to die eventually and the blood will be on Greg Abbott's hands and the hands of the Texas legislature.
Infanticide annoys me. I don't consider these cases abortions so obviously there should have be exceptions made for unviable pregnancies and medical complications.Misty » 09 Mar 2023, 10:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Except these women were not that.
They wanted their babies, but developed serious complications in their pregnancies.
This seems so out of character for you.
I had no idea that you were such a heartless bastard.
There was one gal that managed it for seven years. Unless those carnies were having me on.Misty » 09 Mar 2023, 10:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Weren't you in the medical field?
Do you really not understand that sometimes an abortion is medically necessary?
Do you also not understand that sometimes a fetus can die in the womb?
Do you expect a woman to have to carry around a dead fetus in her uterus?
No woman should have to go through that - it is a crime. I wouldn't wish it on a jewish of colored. Okay, maybe on Whoopie.Misty » 09 Mar 2023, 10:08 pm » wrote: ↑ All of these women were told that their fetuses would not survive, but they were not given the option of an abortion.
One of them had become pregnant after 18 months of fertility treatments so she obviously wanted her baby.
She had just entered her second trimester when she was told that she had dilated prematurely and that the loss of her fetus, whom she and her husband had named Willow, was "inevitable".
She was forced to wait until her body entered sepsis, also known as blood poisoning, and doctors were allowed to perform an abortion.
Is this really how you believe women deserve to be treated?
Most will die. The one that sold tickets, now I think about it, was probably lying. She was a gypsy. Those people lie.Misty » 09 Mar 2023, 10:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Tell that to these five women in Texas and the many more in their predicament.
I guess you didn't bother to read anything I posted.
Some of the fetuses were already dead.
What do you think happens to a woman who is forced to carry around a dead fetus in her uterus?
My dad did.Misty » 09 Mar 2023, 10:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Like one of the women who is suing Texas she can develop sepsis.
Riddle me this.....can people die from sepsis?
WOW!Cannonpointer » 09 Mar 2023, 10:44 pm » wrote: ↑And the thing to remember is, "fly to Colorado" is not an option for literally millions of poor texans. If this had happened to a woman of a different socio-economic demo, SHE WOULD HAVE DIED.Misty » 09 Mar 2023, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑ One of these women was denied an abortion after her water broke at 19 weeks — too early for the fetus to survive.
Fearing the prospect of severe infection, she had to fly to Colorado for a termination.
The courts definitely should - and almost certainly will - do the heavy lifting on this one. Populism will always need a tempering force - our republic is designed to provide it.
Not trying to mitigate the **** up - just celebrating (and hoping) that it will likely get fixed
A lot of doctors are pretty cowardly. They put ANY threat to their licensure above the health of patients.golfboy » 09 Mar 2023, 10:29 pm » wrote: ↑ If the fetus is dead, it's not an abortion. Just sayin'.
And the others? Why didn't they use the law's exception for this?
"person may not knowingly perform, induce, or attempt an abortion unless the mother has 'a life-threatening physical condition aggravated by, caused by, or arising from a pregnancy that places [her] at risk of death or poses a serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function unless the abortion is performed or induced."
.Cannonpointer » 09 Mar 2023, 10:48 pm » wrote: ↑No woman should have to go through that - it is a crime. I wouldn't wish it on a jewish of colored. Okay, maybe on Whoopie.Misty » 09 Mar 2023, 10:08 pm » wrote: ↑ All of these women were told that their fetuses would not survive, but they were not given the option of an abortion.
One of them had become pregnant after 18 months of fertility treatments so she obviously wanted her baby.
She had just entered her second trimester when she was told that she had dilated prematurely and that the loss of her fetus, whom she and her husband had named Willow, was "inevitable".
She was forced to wait until her body entered sepsis, also known as blood poisoning, and doctors were allowed to perform an abortion.
Dude, you're a scientist. You GOTTA know that's russian roulette for non gypsies.Str8tEdge » 09 Mar 2023, 10:29 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. That’s not a medical emergency if you can fly to a different state lol…
2. They would receive antibiotics to keep from sepsis as a prophylactic.
That's giving head - not dying. Dying bums dudes out, unless they're in the will.
She seems of the opinion that legislatures are capable of perfection.Vegas » 09 Mar 2023, 10:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I am definitely right about your mental issues. You definitely have Borderline Personality Disorder. You check the DSM boxes.
Have you noticed that the clinically insane on this site are all progressives? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
I literally said that laws for medical reasons should be tweaked to accommodate that. God man. Why don't progressives ever read anything?
Putucak?Trumprules » 09 Mar 2023, 10:38 pm » wrote: ↑ It's OK you don't have to suffer. It's all good. What's more insane than putting another oersons life in danger just to make a putucak point. Don't worry you won't die. But others will and you don't care.
I kissed my sister.Misty » 09 Mar 2023, 10:41 pm » wrote: ↑ First of all it was a question not a statement of fact, and I only said it once, so I don't know why you said I keep doing it.
And secondly, you don't understand that a fetus can die within the womb and that the treatment for that is a D and C (Dilation and Curettage) IOW an abortion?
Have any of you pinheads actually gotten a woman pregnant?
None of you seem to know anything about this stuff.
I know it's in or near the vulva. Or the uvuvla. I get those mixed up (sometimes on purpose).
Once again, a D&C for a dead fetus is not an abortion and is not prohibited in Texas.Misty » 09 Mar 2023, 10:41 pm » wrote: ↑ First of all it was a question not a statement of fact, and I only said it once, so I don't know why you said I keep doing it.
And secondly, you don't understand that a fetus can die within the womb and that the treatment for that is a D and C (Dilation and Curettage) IOW an abortion?
Have any of you pinheads actually gotten a woman pregnant?
None of you seem to know anything about this stuff.
And there are, in the Texas law. But there is no accounting for cowardice and inhumanity in the doctoring profession. Don't forget, these are the cocksuckers who denied treatment for an EMINENTLY treatable airborn infalmmatory virus and recommended experimental "vaccines" for the patients they refused proven treatments with basic, long-proved anti-virals.Neo » 09 Mar 2023, 10:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Infanticide annoys me. I don't consider these cases abortions so obviously there should have be exceptions made for unviable pregnancies and medical complications.
True.Cannonpointer » 09 Mar 2023, 10:55 pm » wrote: ↑ A lot of doctors are pretty cowardly. They put ANY threat to their licensure above the health of patients.
Why? You've known me over a decade and I have ALWAYS been pro-choice.
No. They're control freak morons.Misty » 09 Mar 2023, 10:54 pm » wrote: ↑Can you please enlighten some of the neanderthals on this forum who believe that a woman should have to die along with her nonviable or already dead fetus?
No, they never do. They always see the exception with 20/20 vision - when it affects them. Otherwise never.Misty » 09 Mar 2023, 10:54 pm » wrote: ↑I'm pretty sure they wouldn't feel that way if it was their woman whose health or life was at risk.
Or maybe they would.
There are a great many women, and only a few in their right minds.Misty » 09 Mar 2023, 10:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Who am I kidding?
No woman in her right mind would ever agree to procreate with any of these jerks.
There should have been but the problem is that many of these laws are being passed so quickly and are so poorly and vaguely written that doctors are not sure what is or is not legal.Neo » 09 Mar 2023, 10:48 pm » wrote: ↑Infanticide annoys me. I don't consider these cases abortions so obviously there should have be exceptions made for unviable pregnancies and medical complications.Misty » 09 Mar 2023, 10:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Except these women were not that.
They wanted their babies, but developed serious complications in their pregnancies.
This seems so out of character for you.
I had no idea that you were such a heartless bastard.
Do you go doctor shopping when you are having a medical emergency?golfboy » 09 Mar 2023, 11:05 pm » wrote: ↑True.Cannonpointer » 09 Mar 2023, 10:55 pm » wrote: ↑ A lot of doctors are pretty cowardly. They put ANY threat to their licensure above the health of patients.
So go to another doctor.