Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Op-Ed: White Men Prove Incapable Of Handling More Than One Task At A Time
Op-Ed: White Men Prove Incapable Of Handling More Than One Task At A Time
By Punch
16 Mar 2023 12:34 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
10 posts • Page 1 of 1
16 Mar 2023 12:34 am
This is the latest devastating Op-Ed from Afrotech. Most of you have probably read it already, but for those who missed it...
Op-Ed: White Men Prove Incapable Of Handling More Than One Task At A Time (msn.com)
Despite all the indicators of incompetence on the part of an executive team made up of over 70% white men, the “Andy Kesslers” of the world flocked to The Wall Street Journal opinion section to entertain the classic argument that focusing on diversity, equity, and inclusion was a distraction from the “real” business of running Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). How original and certainly worthy of publication! Those who promote this idea seem oblivious to the fact that they are essentially admitting that homogeneous leadership teams are incapable of multitasking. If incorporating the perspectives of women, LGBTQ, and Black people is enough to cause a group of white men to fail in leading SVB, then they were not competent to manage a bank in the first place.So, let’s be clear — a focus and commitment to diversity is a strength and never a distraction. Research has shown that companies with diverse leadership teams are more likely to be profitable because they can tap into a wider range of customers and markets while being better equipped to address the needs and preferences of a wide range of customer groups.The Selig Center for Economic Growth estimates that African American and Hispanic consumers combine to have 20% of the total buying power in the United States. This equates to trillions of dollars spent in alignment with a different set of needs and preferences. Therefore, companies that want to participate in this economy and sell to more than just white men must have the perspectives of more than just white men at the table.
Op-Ed: White Men Prove Incapable Of Handling More Than One Task At A Time (msn.com)
Despite all the indicators of incompetence on the part of an executive team made up of over 70% white men, the “Andy Kesslers” of the world flocked to The Wall Street Journal opinion section to entertain the classic argument that focusing on diversity, equity, and inclusion was a distraction from the “real” business of running Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). How original and certainly worthy of publication! Those who promote this idea seem oblivious to the fact that they are essentially admitting that homogeneous leadership teams are incapable of multitasking. If incorporating the perspectives of women, LGBTQ, and Black people is enough to cause a group of white men to fail in leading SVB, then they were not competent to manage a bank in the first place.So, let’s be clear — a focus and commitment to diversity is a strength and never a distraction. Research has shown that companies with diverse leadership teams are more likely to be profitable because they can tap into a wider range of customers and markets while being better equipped to address the needs and preferences of a wide range of customer groups.The Selig Center for Economic Growth estimates that African American and Hispanic consumers combine to have 20% of the total buying power in the United States. This equates to trillions of dollars spent in alignment with a different set of needs and preferences. Therefore, companies that want to participate in this economy and sell to more than just white men must have the perspectives of more than just white men at the table.
16 Mar 2023 1:21 am
White men have small penises, can't dance and are all dorks !
ultraliberals are not happy unless they are obsessing about something.
.
.
.
.
.
.
16 Mar 2023 2:51 am
Is that so? I call horse ****. Let's look at ONE (of thousands available) diversity snapshot, pookums:Punch » 16 Mar 2023, 12:34 am » wrote: ↑ So, let’s be clear — a focus and commitment to diversity is a strength and never a distraction.
Diverity is our strength, fruitcake? That's not what our burning cities indicate, you **** idiot.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
16 Mar 2023 7:30 am
Hey, you been talking to my wife?MackTheFinger » 16 Mar 2023, 1:21 am » wrote: ↑ White men have small penises, can't dance and are all dorks !
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." 
16 Mar 2023 7:40 am
Punch » 16 Mar 2023, 12:34 am » wrote: ↑ This is the latest devastating Op-Ed from Afrotech. Most of you have probably read it already, but for those who missed it...
Op-Ed: White Men Prove Incapable Of Handling More Than One Task At A Time (msn.com)
Despite all the indicators of incompetence on the part of an executive team made up of over 70% white men, the “Andy Kesslers” of the world flocked to The Wall Street Journal opinion section to entertain the classic argument that focusing on diversity, equity, and inclusion was a distraction from the “real” business of running Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). How original and certainly worthy of publication! Those who promote this idea seem oblivious to the fact that they are essentially admitting that homogeneous leadership teams are incapable of multitasking. If incorporating the perspectives of women, LGBTQ, and Black people is enough to cause a group of white men to fail in leading SVB, then they were not competent to manage a bank in the first place.So, let’s be clear — a focus and commitment to diversity is a strength and never a distraction. Research has shown that companies with diverse leadership teams are more likely to be profitable because they can tap into a wider range of customers and markets while being better equipped to address the needs and preferences of a wide range of customer groups.The Selig Center for Economic Growth estimates that African American and Hispanic consumers combine to have 20% of the total buying power in the United States. This equates to trillions of dollars spent in alignment with a different set of needs and preferences. Therefore, companies that want to participate in this economy and sell to more than just white men must have the perspectives of more than just white men at the table.
You mean leftist white men. Just look at lily white Biden...he's failed at everything.
16 Mar 2023 9:48 am
.
NO...it's just we are all the same.
ultraliberals are not happy unless they are obsessing about something.
.
.
.
.
.
.
16 Mar 2023 9:54 am
About 90% of all wealth in this country is controlled by 10% of the population.
The 90% of Americans own the remaining 10%.
If you own shares in an ETF of mutual fund, you only can sell the shares or buy more. Your controlling interest in the companies owned by the ETF or Mutual Fund companies belongs to the managing companies.
When I own actual shares in some company, the election is pretty much like th ones Stalin held in the USSR.
I am given a list of management people in BP or Exon or JPMorgan. I am told that management recommends that I vote FOR this list.
I have only the option of voting FOR the list given. There is no alternate list. I can only vote FOR the management's candidates and the measures that they propose.
If a majority of the shareholders were to vote NO, what would happen?
Management would hold another election, and another and another and another.
Of course, the number of shares that I own is comparatively puny. I would be outvoted by the fatcats that own a majority of the shares.
There is ZERO chance that shareholders could ever replace the Johnson family as executives of Johnson & Johnson. ZERO, NADA, NIENTE, RIEN, BUPKISS>
The 90% of Americans own the remaining 10%.
If you own shares in an ETF of mutual fund, you only can sell the shares or buy more. Your controlling interest in the companies owned by the ETF or Mutual Fund companies belongs to the managing companies.
When I own actual shares in some company, the election is pretty much like th ones Stalin held in the USSR.
I am given a list of management people in BP or Exon or JPMorgan. I am told that management recommends that I vote FOR this list.
I have only the option of voting FOR the list given. There is no alternate list. I can only vote FOR the management's candidates and the measures that they propose.
If a majority of the shareholders were to vote NO, what would happen?
Management would hold another election, and another and another and another.
Of course, the number of shares that I own is comparatively puny. I would be outvoted by the fatcats that own a majority of the shares.
There is ZERO chance that shareholders could ever replace the Johnson family as executives of Johnson & Johnson. ZERO, NADA, NIENTE, RIEN, BUPKISS>
16 Mar 2023 9:56 am
The truth is EVERYONE can only handle one task at a time. Some people choose to flip back and forth on different tasks, but they are always only focusing on one at a time. Smart, productive, efficient people focus on one task until it is complete and then go onto the next. Scaterbrains engage in multi-task mayhem.Punch » 16 Mar 2023, 12:34 am » wrote: ↑ This is the latest devastating Op-Ed from Afrotech. Most of you have probably read it already, but for those who missed it...
Op-Ed: White Men Prove Incapable Of Handling More Than One Task At A Time (msn.com)
Despite all the indicators of incompetence on the part of an executive team made up of over 70% white men, the “Andy Kesslers” of the world flocked to The Wall Street Journal opinion section to entertain the classic argument that focusing on diversity, equity, and inclusion was a distraction from the “real” business of running Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). How original and certainly worthy of publication! Those who promote this idea seem oblivious to the fact that they are essentially admitting that homogeneous leadership teams are incapable of multitasking. If incorporating the perspectives of women, LGBTQ, and Black people is enough to cause a group of white men to fail in leading SVB, then they were not competent to manage a bank in the first place.So, let’s be clear — a focus and commitment to diversity is a strength and never a distraction. Research has shown that companies with diverse leadership teams are more likely to be profitable because they can tap into a wider range of customers and markets while being better equipped to address the needs and preferences of a wide range of customer groups.The Selig Center for Economic Growth estimates that African American and Hispanic consumers combine to have 20% of the total buying power in the United States. This equates to trillions of dollars spent in alignment with a different set of needs and preferences. Therefore, companies that want to participate in this economy and sell to more than just white men must have the perspectives of more than just white men at the table.
This is what causes women to nearly always be the ones to ram their cars into the back of others!
16 Mar 2023 9:57 am
No one makes you invest.Xavier_Onassis » 16 Mar 2023, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ About 90% of all wealth in this country is controlled by 10% of the population.
The 90% of Americans own the remaining 10%.
If you own shares in an ETF of mutual fund, you only can sell the shares or buy more. Your controlling interest in the companies owned by the ETF or Mutual Fund companies belongs to the managing companies.
When I own actual shares in some company, the election is pretty much like th ones Stalin held in the USSR.
I am given a list of management people in BP or Exon or JPMorgan. I am told that management recommends that I vote FOR this list.
I have only the option of voting FOR the list given. There is no alternate list. I can only vote FOR the management's candidates and the measures that they propose.
If a majority of the shareholders were to vote NO, what would happen?
Management would hold another election, and another and another and another.
Of course, the number of shares that I own is comparatively puny. I would be outvoted by the fatcats that own a majority of the shares.
There is ZERO chance that shareholders could ever replace the Johnson family as executives of Johnson & Johnson. ZERO, NADA, NIENTE, RIEN, BUPKISS>
[https://i.imgflip.com/9z0a87.jpg][/img]
16 Mar 2023 10:47 am
fitting my homies would get a chuckle from your comment...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
10 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 2528 users online :: 12 registered, 17 bots, and 2499 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, RebelGator, Beekeeper, jerra b, PhiloBeddo, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: MaxPointCrawler, MicroMessenger, Mediatoolkitbot, proximic, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, okhttp, Applebot, YandexBot, NING, curl/7, Baiduspider, bingbot, Googlebot