It didn't just "crash". Its pilots forced it down so as not to allow the Russians to capture it. Also, the drone wasn't merely there to "insist on its refusal to accept special airspace limits". It was sent there to do reconnaissance on Russian Military operations.Xavier_Onassis » 16 Mar 2023, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ The US claims that the airspace over the Black Sea is open to all.
The Russians claim that they have imposed a "special limit" over this airspace.
So the US sends the drone in to insist on its refusal to accept any such special limits.
The Russian tries to disable the drone and it crashes.
This is about airspace over oceans and seas, not just in the Black Sea but also over the Taiwan Strait and other locations.
Skans » 17 Mar 2023, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ It didn't just "crash". Its pilots forced it down so as not to allow the Russians to capture it. Also, the drone wasn't merely there to "insist on its refusal to accept special airspace limits". It was sent there to do reconnaissance on Russian Military operations.
I tend to doubt that. The Russians could have just shot the damn thing.
You are right. The west and their lapdog media are not telling he whole story.johndnorth » 16 Mar 2023, 10:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Putin will win by attrition. We are bombarded by Russian casualty reports. Where are Ukrainian casualty reports? Russia will mobilize 1.5 million. How many men can Ukraine toss into the grinder. Russia has been attacking Bakhmut for 7 months to gain 29 km. The Wagner group has been decimated. The dope that runs Wagner will not survive the war. Estimates of Russian casualties at Bakhmut are up to 30,000. How many Ukrainians have perished? Ukraine does not have the manpower to stop the Russian grinder no matter what we give them, and no matter how incompetent the ill supplied Russian army is. There is a certain amount of resistance in Russia but not enough to stop the war. Negotiate a deal.
NO ONE SAID IT DID, NUMBNUTS. A SIMILARIZATION OF AMERICA/NATOS BRAZEN APPROACH TO INTERFERE WHERE IT HAS NO JURISDICTION. ONE RESULTING IN HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF CIVILIANS DEATHS, THE OTHER INVOLVING ITSELF IN AN UNWARRANTED PROXY WAR.Xavier_Onassis » 17 Mar 2023, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ NOTHING OBAMA DID OR DID NOT DO IN SYRIA HAS ONE DAMNED THING TO DO WITH THIS DRONE INCIDENT, dipstick.
NOT QUITE. IT WAS PISSED ON BY THE FEDERATIONS SU-27 FIGHTER JETS BLINDING THE DRONES OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS SENDING IT WHERE IT BELONGS, THE BLACK SEA.Skans » 17 Mar 2023, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ It didn't just "crash". Its pilots forced it down so as not to allow the Russians to capture it. Also, the drone wasn't merely there to "insist on its refusal to accept special airspace limits". It was sent there to do reconnaissance on Russian Military operations.
China is going to broker peace in Ukraine?righteous » 17 Mar 2023, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ NO ONE SAID IT DID, NUMBNUTS. A SIMILARIZATION OF AMERICA/NATOS BRAZEN APPROACH TO INTERFERE WHERE IT HAS NO JURISDICTION. ONE RESULTING IN HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF CIVILIANS DEATHS, THE OTHER INVOLVING ITSELF IN AN UNWARRANTED PROXY WAR.
Ok. They destroyed a drone. LOL - not really that big of a deal.righteous » 17 Mar 2023, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑ NOT QUITE. IT WAS PISSED ON BY THE FEDERATIONS SU-27 FIGHTER JETS BLINDING THE DRONES OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS SENDING IT WHERE IT BELONGS, THE BLACK SEA.
Skans » 18 Mar 2023, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ Ok. They destroyed a drone. LOL - not really that big of a deal.
IT IS FOR WESTERN MEDIASkans » 18 Mar 2023, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ Ok. They destroyed a drone. LOL - not really that big of a deal.
Stick with Subaru Brokebacks, Dr. Brokeback.Xavier_Onassis » 16 Mar 2023, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ The US claims that the airspace over the Black Sea is open to all.
The Russians claim that they have imposed a "special limit" over this airspace.
So the US sends the drone in to insist on its refusal to accept any such special limits.
The Russian tries to disable the drone and it crashes.
This is about airspace over oceans and seas, not just in the Black Sea but also over the Taiwan Strait and other locations.
ON ISSUES THAT GOVERNMENT CONTROLS THEIR OPINIONS ABOUT WHAT IS SPOKEN TO THE VIEWERS.PastorBlast » 18 Mar 2023, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ You are opposed to Western Media?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_mF0DhDSlo