THE BIDEN CRIME ORGANIZATION SHOULD HAVE THOUGHT OF THAT SINCE IT HAS GIVEN 200 BILLION IN AID TO UKRAINE.
WE WOULDN'T BE TALKING ABOUT ANY OF THIS **** HAD THE BIDEN CRIME ORGANIZATION NOT GIVEN UKRAINE 200 BILLION IN AID TO DATERedheadedStranger » 17 Mar 2023, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑ A couple of points...
1) SNAP benefits should not be open ended. They should only provide basic staples for sustenance and not **** like Snicker's bars, gas station hot dogs, and Monster energy drinks.
2) A budget is rarely blown on big ticket items. It's nickel and dimed to death on the little stuff. The attitude that "well it's only a couple of bucks more" is what runs people out of money at the end of the month and leaves them unable to pay their bills and/or provide for their families.
3) Borrowing money to pay debt is a fools errand. Borrowing from Peter to pay Paul is just stupid.
THE KNUCKLEHEAD IS ALL OVER THE PLACE WITH SPINRedheadedStranger » 17 Mar 2023, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ And this has what to do with your OP exactly?
You get your *** kicked on your topic, so you try to change the subject of YOUR OWN thread to "white man bad".
You're pathetic.
Let the children starve for the sins of their parents? Idiot.Skans » 17 Mar 2023, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ There is no "right to eat". You, individually, have the right to PURSUE life, liberty and happiness. I would assume that life and happiness are tied to eating. Therefore, it is your right to obtain food for yourself, not the government's duty to feed you.
You have the right to life.
Not what he said, but when you have no argument you have to be an idiot, right?Punch » 03 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Let the children starve for the sins of their parents? Idiot.
Your statement is irrelevant. There is no right to eat. Not in the United States.Punch » 03 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Let the children starve for the sins of their parents? Idiot.
Skans, could you do me a favor and give this to your mom.Skans » 03 Apr 2023, 8:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Your statement is irrelevant. There is no right to eat. Not in the United States.

No. You have the right to life, not to live.
golfboy » 18 Mar 2023, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑ What is it about $32 TRILLION in debt, do you NOT understand?
golfboy » 04 Apr 2023, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑ No. You have the right to life, not to live.
If you don't want to work and earn money to live, no one else has any responsibility to take care of you.
Skans » 03 Apr 2023, 8:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Your statement is irrelevant. There is no right to eat. Not in the United States.
Evidently you can't read.SJConspirator » 04 Apr 2023, 7:57 pm » wrote: ↑ the workers are the ones starving , retard.
You have this totally backwards.. you want to pamper the lazy and punish the productive. **** off with that ****
Wow, that makes no sense whatsoever.SJConspirator » 04 Apr 2023, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I dont understand who that debt is owed to. Were the richest country on earth right? Are you saying earth owes itself money?
There is neither any right to an abortion nor a right to stop abortion in the US.SJConspirator » 04 Apr 2023, 7:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I imagine you are pro choice, then? Because surely you are not saying that babies must be born just to starve to death. That level of cruelty is beyond even you
Skans » 04 Apr 2023, 8:10 pm » wrote: ↑ There is neither any right to an abortion nor a right to stop abortion in the US.
As for babies being born to starve to death. Who's responsibility is it to take care of the life they created? Is it my responsibility to feed your child? If so, then I suppose I have the right to enslave you to produce money to feed my child. Because that is precisely what you are doing when you declare that I MUST feed your child.
No, you have every right to make babies, feed them or let them die. Your babies, your responsibility, their lives or deaths squarely upon your shoulders.

Skans » 04 Apr 2023, 8:10 pm » wrote: ↑ There is neither any right to an abortion nor a right to stop abortion in the US.
As for babies being born to starve to death. Who's responsibility is it to take care of the life they created? Is it my responsibility to feed your child? If so, then I suppose I have the right to enslave you to produce money to feed my child. Because that is precisely what you are doing when you declare that I MUST feed your child.
No, you have every right to make babies, feed them or let them die. Your babies, your responsibility, their lives or deaths squarely upon your shoulders.
Not owed to, owed from.SJConspirator » 04 Apr 2023, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I dont understand who that debt is owed to. Were the richest country on earth right? Are you saying earth owes itself money?
No. I do not believe in the "concept" of rights.SJConspirator » 04 Apr 2023, 11:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you believe in the concept of rights? If so, please do tell what rights you think exist and whom do they belong to
The Constitution? Thats what you believe in?Skans » 05 Apr 2023, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑ No. I do not believe in the "concept" of rights.
I believe in the rights guaranteed to us by the founding document of this country we happen to live in - The Constitution; and of the various state constitutions to the extent they do not interfere with the rights guaranteed to us by the US Constitution.