Liberal Forum

Neo » 18 Mar 2023, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2023, 11:58 am

I don't believe people should be shamed for poverty but think sushi might be an indicator that things have gone too far the other direction. We should return to sending out government manufactured food as a start.

I think you get my meaning.
Embarrassment can be a short term event.
Shame is when you live on it forever.

Neither is "allowed" these days. You are becoming one of them. Shake it off.

Neo » 17 Mar 2023, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Mar 2023, 12:02 pm

Friend is on snap. End of the month she brings us sushi platters from the grocery store. While I enjoy grocery store sushi as much as the next person I remember eating government cheese and crackers. We should perhaps return to that model?

As a supermarket worker when I was a kid, even then the food stamp abuse was profound.  I'd watch a family come in as soon as the food stamps were received and load up their cart with piles of food that most people paying with cash could never afford. Rib roasts, lobster tails, cakes and pies, ice cream, soda, and snacks, and often finishing with two carts overflowing, then watch them argue with cashiers because they couldn't use their food stamps on things like bleach, dog food, cigarettes, and toys.

One simple reform would make most taxpayers happy would be to require drug testing for all welfare recipients every month, and all welfare cut off for several months if they test positive.  But liberal Democrats will never go for that because they prefer to keep the welfare mob voting for them rather than see them contributing to society, so they would NEVER require responsibility by those receiving it.
 

Bye-bye, XO.


 
 

Xavier_Onassis » 17 Mar 2023, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Mar 2023, 12:07 pm

There has been only about FOUR YEARS in which the US government did not spend more than it took in. And that was when Andrew Jackson STOLE the lands that the Five Civilized Tribes in the South had cleared off and planted. Then he sold it to future slaveholders so they could grow cotton.

What is it about $32 TRILLION in debt, do you NOT understand?
 

DeplorablePatriot » 18 Mar 2023, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2023, 6:03 pm

Bye-bye, XO.

give me a cheeseburger

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyV41-t ... rt_radio=1


 

DeezerShoove » 18 Mar 2023, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2023, 12:17 pm

I think you get my meaning.
Embarrassment can be a short term event.
Shame is when you live on it forever.

Neither is "allowed" these days. You are becoming one of them. Shake it off.

Please.  Liberals have no shame and it's impossible to embarrass them because they have no sense of pride or self worth.
 

golfboy » 18 Mar 2023, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2023, 6:10 pm

Please.  Liberals have no shame and it's impossible to embarrass them because they have no sense of pride or self worth.

The mother **** will be donating to drag quuen funds in a heart beat

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51270i8 ... cQ&index=2

 

golfboy » 18 Mar 2023, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2023, 6:10 pm

Please.  Liberals have no shame and it's impossible to embarrass them because they have no sense of pride or self worth.

I beg your pardon! They have gay pride.   

The4thReich » 17 Mar 2023, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Mar 2023, 3:42 pm

Someone is saying you have no right to eat?

I am. 
You have the ability to eat, but no right. 
 
 

Xavier_Onassis » 17 Mar 2023, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

17 Mar 2023, 10:45 am

xaivior onassis  180 backwards, Buy a man, eat fish, the day, teach man to a lifetime.


 Stop tax funding large corporations that will abuse the individual like old world feudal monarchy lords. Corporations need to go out of business and the individual needs to survive.

 

I am always on the lookout for bargains in grocery stores, and patronize about six of them regularly. I have noticed that people payng with EBT cards are very selective in what they buy and buy store brands and cheaper protein: chicken legs & thighs, cheaper cuts of pork and lots and lots of rice and beans. The only nonessential thing I have noticed that they buy in abundance is water. And most of those that do, but it outside the store, filling their own 5 gallon jugs.

Skans » 17 Mar 2023, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

17 Mar 2023, 11:36 am

There is no "right to eat".  You, individually, have the right to PURSUE life, liberty and happiness.  I would assume that life and happiness are tied to eating.  Therefore, it is your right to obtain food for yourself, not the government's duty to feed you.

Minor dependent children certainly have the right to eat. Even if they have to tax someone like Skans to pay for their food.

The issue therefore is who shall cook for them and fed them?
Would it be cheaper to take the children away from their parents and board and feed them in public orphanages, or to pay their parents with relatively small amounts of food so they can pay the rent and tend to their own children?

The US government for many years did precisely that to American Indian children, from the 1870'[s until the 1960's. They seized the Indian children, and sent them off to boarding schools.  The US govt. seized 10,000 acres of reservation property and gave it to the Catholic church to run boarding schools, where they forbade the children to speak any tribal language and beat them in an attempt to turn them into "civilized" people.  The results were awful. 

Xavier_Onassis » 19 Mar 2023, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2023, 9:40 am

Minor dependent children certainly have the right to eat.
 

No.  They have no such right.

Even if they have to tax someone like Skans to pay for their food.

Irrelevant.  They have no such right.

The issue therefore is who shall cook for them and fed them?

Irrelevant.  They have no such right.

Would it be cheaper to take the children away from their parents and board and feed them in public orphanages,

Yes.  But, they still have no right to eat.

The US government for many years did precisely that to American Indian children, from the 1870'[s until the 1960's. They seized the Indian children, and sent them off to boarding schools. 

Still irrelevant.  However, the US government had no right to do this.


 

Warcok » 17 Mar 2023, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 Mar 2023, 11:32 am

It's easy to spot a welfare queen in a grocery store. They tend to shop for the whole month when they get their Obama bucks. There's hardly any fresh produce in their basket. It's 85% carbs and sugar.

Its easy to spot single women in grocery stores as well by looking at what they buy.  It's also easy for women to spot single guys at grocery stores.  Not a bad place to "hook-up" if you know what you are shopping for.
 

i doubt that even most of the monarchs of the 19th century would agree with you that it is in the interest that the children of the future generation should starve. Bismarck would not agree with you on this, nor would Disraeli.

Skans » 19 Mar 2023, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2023, 10:22 am

No.  They have no such right.

Irrelevant.  They have no such right.

Irrelevant.  They have no such right.

Yes.  But, they still have no right to eat.

Still irrelevant.  However, the US government had no right to do this.

Then the descendants of former Indian children compelled to attend Indian boarding schools deserve reparations, because they were seriously harmed, and the harm can be proven to affect even present generations. Indian boarding schools continued to exist until the 1960's.

The people of this country have a clear interest that children do not starve.  After all,  they are the ones that will fight to defend the nation. They are the ones whose taxes will fund Social Security.

Skans » 19 Mar 2023, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2023, 10:24 am

Its easy to spot single women in grocery stores as well by looking at what they buy.  It's also easy for women to spot single guys at grocery stores.  Not a bad place to "hook-up" if you know what you are shopping for.

Women looking for men- Hardware store. Might even find one that could fix something.  
 

Xavier_Onassis » 19 Mar 2023, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2023, 9:32 am

I am always on the lookout for bargains in grocery stores, and patronize about six of them regularly. I have noticed that people payng with EBT cards are very selective in what they buy and buy store brands and cheaper protein: chicken legs & thighs, cheaper cuts of pork and lots and lots of rice and beans. The only nonessential thing I have noticed that they buy in abundance is water. And most of those that do, but it outside the store, filling their own 5 gallon jugs.

LSOS. No, that's not a distress signal.
It's you, a Lying Sack Of ****. 

Take a look at the size of EBT *** women sometime. They roam the snack isle for hours on end. Filthy, parasitic pigs.


 

 
 

Xavier_Onassis » 19 Mar 2023, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2023, 10:30 am

Then the descendants of former Indian children compelled to attend Indian boarding schools deserve reparations, because they were seriously harmed, and the harm can be proven to affect even present generations. Indian boarding schools continued to exist until the 1960's.

The people of this country have a clear interest that children do not starve.  After all,  they are the ones that will fight to defend the nation. They are the ones whose taxes will fund Social Security.

Nobody can fight to defend this nation with "leaders" like Brandon who are in bed with the enemy (chinks), ****.
 

Trump's deficit was much larger than Obama's
This was largely because of his tax cuts.