Republicans are mad at the FBI

User avatar
By Pastafarian
20 Mar 2023 7:01 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2 3
User avatar
Pastafarian
20 Mar 2023 7:01 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
4,050 posts
Bcuz the FBI doesn’t do their bidding anymore. 

The selective outrage is understandable. 
User avatar
Southern Adolf
20 Mar 2023 7:03 am
User avatar
   
764 posts
Know what's funny? I come back after a short break and see all you libs with a "groomer" badge. I'll have to spend more time here. Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!
User avatar
Chiseler151
20 Mar 2023 7:41 am
User avatar
   
263 posts
Why should we take anything a child grooming sexual predator says seriously?
User avatar
Vegas
20 Mar 2023 12:08 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,860 posts
Pastafarian » 20 Mar 2023, 7:01 am » wrote: Bcuz the FBI doesn’t do their bidding anymore. 

The selective outrage is understandable.

Opinion. No evidence. 

Groomer. Sexual predator. ^^^
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
User avatar
Neo
20 Mar 2023 12:27 pm
Neo
User avatar
     
3,818 posts
Pastafarian » 20 Mar 2023, 7:01 am » wrote: Bcuz the FBI doesn’t do their bidding anymore. 

The selective outrage is understandable.
Doj shouldn't be partisan. Think the complaints are valid. 
 
User avatar
PhiloBeddo
20 Mar 2023 12:30 pm
User avatar
     
3,687 posts
Dam right. The FBI has been corrupted by the Dems. The FBI is an enforcer for the Dem party. That's ****.
User avatar
Pastafarian
20 Mar 2023 12:40 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
4,050 posts
Neo » 20 Mar 2023, 12:27 pm » wrote: Doj shouldn't be partisan. Think the complaints are valid.
like what?

 
User avatar
Pastafarian
20 Mar 2023 12:41 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
4,050 posts
Chiseler151 » 20 Mar 2023, 7:41 am » wrote: Why should we take anything a child grooming sexual predator says seriously?
You can slander me all you want but you’d still be wrong. 
 
User avatar
Cannonpointer
20 Mar 2023 12:47 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,710 posts
Pastafarian » 20 Mar 2023, 12:41 pm » wrote: You can slander me all you want but you’d still be wrong.
Shut up, groomer.

Spit the dick out, and sit with your cock trap closed for a while.
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
FJB
20 Mar 2023 1:02 pm
FJB
User avatar
      
8,600 posts
Democrats have weaponized the **** fbi.
User avatar
Neo
20 Mar 2023 1:17 pm
Neo
User avatar
     
3,818 posts
Like ruby ridge, like Waco, like calling white supremacist organizations a larger threat to domestic security than narco terrorist cartels or street gangs. Like putting parents who object to woke education at board meetings on watch lists .
 
User avatar
Deezer Shoove
20 Mar 2023 1:22 pm
User avatar
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
10,232 posts
FJB » 20 Mar 2023, 1:02 pm » wrote: Democrats have weaponized the **** fbi.
I believe this is the case as well.
It is EASILY demonstrated by how so-called classified documents
were handled at the "homes" of Trump vs Biden.

There are many events that are dubious (tipped in the Dems favor) regarding the FBI.
 
Please seat yourself.

Image

I like the very things you hate.
User avatar
MR-7
20 Mar 2023 1:30 pm
User avatar
      
7,589 posts
We can start here....

Comey drafted an exoneration statement for Hillary Clinton months before the FBI even investigated her
 
10/16/2017 Newsweek

 In documents it released on Monday, the FBI confirmed that former FBI Director James Comey drafted a statement about the conclusion of the Hillary Clinton email investigation months before interviewing Clinton.

The records show that on May 2, 2016, Comey emailed Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. The subject of the email was "midyear exam," and though the email says its contents are unclassified, the body of the email is redacted in the release.

On Monday, the bureau also released a response to the May 2 email. Rybicki sent the response, dated May 16, 2016, to several colleagues: Peter Strzok, Jonathan Moffa, Baker, Trisha Anderson and E.W. Priestap. He copied McCabe and David Bowdich, the associate deputy director. In the email, which is marked "unclassified," Rybicki wrote, "Please send me any comments on this statement so we may roll into a master doc for discussion with the Director at a future dat

The FBI: 103 Scandals, Controversies, & Acts of Corruption :: News Lists (grabien.com)
 
 
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year. :lol:
User avatar
Pastafarian
21 Mar 2023 6:09 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
4,050 posts
MR-7 » 20 Mar 2023, 1:30 pm » wrote: We can start here....

Comey drafted an exoneration statement for Hillary Clinton months before the FBI even investigated her
 
10/16/2017 Newsweek

 In documents it released on Monday, the FBI confirmed that former FBI Director James Comey drafted a statement about the conclusion of the Hillary Clinton email investigation months before interviewing Clinton.

The records show that on May 2, 2016, Comey emailed Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki. The subject of the email was "midyear exam," and though the email says its contents are unclassified, the body of the email is redacted in the release.

On Monday, the bureau also released a response to the May 2 email. Rybicki sent the response, dated May 16, 2016, to several colleagues: Peter Strzok, Jonathan Moffa, Baker, Trisha Anderson and E.W. Priestap. He copied McCabe and David Bowdich, the associate deputy director. In the email, which is marked "unclassified," Rybicki wrote, "Please send me any comments on this statement so we may roll into a master doc for discussion with the Director at a future dat

The FBI: 103 Scandals, Controversies, & Acts of Corruption :: News Lists (grabien.com)
Oh you mean ****. 

Sorry, **** doesn’t hold up in a court of law. 
 
User avatar
Pastafarian
21 Mar 2023 6:15 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
4,050 posts
Neo » 20 Mar 2023, 1:17 pm » wrote: Like ruby ridge, like Waco, like calling white supremacist organizations a larger threat to domestic security than narco terrorist cartels or street gangs. Like putting parents who object to woke education at board meetings on watch lists .
1. What was partisan about Ruby Ridge and Waco?

2. White supremacists are the biggest threat to domestic security. Jan 6 is a great example. 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... error-2020

3. People who threatened school board members were investigated as it should be. 


 
User avatar
Pastafarian
21 Mar 2023 6:15 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
4,050 posts
Cannonpointer » 20 Mar 2023, 12:47 pm » wrote: Shut up, groomer.

Spit the dick out, and sit with your cock trap closed for a while.
**** off, pedo. 

You know where I live. Bring it, ******. 
 
User avatar
Pastafarian
21 Mar 2023 6:17 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
4,050 posts
DeezerShoove » 20 Mar 2023, 1:22 pm » wrote: I believe this is the case as well.
It is EASILY demonstrated by how so-called classified documents
were handled at the "homes" of Trump vs Biden.

There are many events that are dubious (tipped in the Dems favor) regarding the FBI.
You can’t blame anyone else except yourself for Trump’s jizz has blinded you. 

Keep sucking that dick, cum drain. 
 
User avatar
MR-7
21 Mar 2023 6:58 am
User avatar
      
7,589 posts
Pastafarian » 21 Mar 2023, 6:09 am » wrote: Oh you mean ****. 

Sorry, **** doesn’t hold up in a court of law.
Best you got Groomer?
 
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year. :lol:
User avatar
Pastafarian
21 Mar 2023 6:59 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
4,050 posts
MR-7 » 21 Mar 2023, 6:58 am » wrote: Best you got Groomer?
Calling out your ****, pedophile. 

What else you got, cum drain?
 
User avatar
MR-7
21 Mar 2023 7:09 am
User avatar
      
7,589 posts
Here's some more GROOMER.
ImageUnder Comey, the FBI's case against Cliven Bundy was destroyed after the feds were caught deliberately withholding evidence

LAS VEGAS - A federal judge Wednesday declared a mistrial in the prosecution of Nevada cattleman Cliven Bundy, his two sons and a co-defendant, citing the government's "willful'' failure to turn over multiple documents that could help the defense fight conspiracy and assault charges in the 2014 Bunkerville standoff.

"The court does regrettably believe a mistrial in this case is the most suitable and only remedy,'' U.S. District Judge Gloria M. Navarro declared, issuing her ruling from the bench before a packed courtroom.

The judge listed six types of evidence that she said prosecutors deliberately withheld before trial, including information about the presence of an FBI surveillance camera on a hill overlooking the Bundy ranch and documents about U.S. Bureau of Land Management snipers outside the ranch.

The others were maps, an FBI log with entries about snipers on standby, threat assessments that indicated the Bundys weren't violent and that the Bureau of Land Management was trying12/21/2017

 The Oregonian 
 
 
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year. :lol:
1 2 3

Who is online

In total there are 4965 users online :: 4 registered, 14 bots, and 4947 guests
Bots: Reeder, ADmantX, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, proximic, okhttp, YandexBot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, DuckDuckBot, curl/7, Baiduspider, Applebot, bingbot
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search