I didn't sign up to be your research assistant. There is ChatGPT for that. Do it yourself. As long as it doesn't pertain to race, sexual preference, or politics, it should provide you with all of the factual information you obviously so dearly crave. Knock yourself out.Cannonpointer » 21 Mar 2023, 11:16 pm » wrote: ↑ I repeat:
How much has the earth warmed, and in what period of time?
Be specific. Science is specific, and you are pretending to have access to some science that we are either wilfully ignoring or ignorant of.
Either way, you should slap us with the wet cod of reality.
How much has the earth warmed, and in what period of time? Go.
Edit - wait, I get it. You're just a dreck poster.
If you were a rightie, you would be slobbering out a Heritage piece or some horse **** from CATO.
I get it. Back on the dick, beta.
We're swapping experts with capital E's here, right, beta? You've got an emergency room doctor whom you consider a great expert on climate.Punch » 21 Mar 2023, 11:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you read the article I linked? The information is provided by Senior Medical Correspondent Doctor John Torres. He is a medical expert with a capital E.
And you don't even need to be an expert to realize that fungus becoming more adaptable at higher temperatures just makes sense from an evolutionary standpoint.
Wake up and smell the fungus.
Beta, backing YOUR OP does not make you MY reasearch assistant.Punch » 21 Mar 2023, 11:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't sign up to be your research assistant. There is ChatGPT for that. Do it yourself. As long as it doesn't pertain to race, sexual preference, or politics, it should provide you with all of the factual information you obviously so dearly crave. Knock yourself out.
Don't make me bring Greta and her legion of Climate Scientists to the table, because I will.Cannonpointer » 21 Mar 2023, 11:39 pm » wrote: ↑ We're swapping experts with capital E's here, right, beta? You've got an emergency room doctor whom you consider a great expert on climate.
I'm not a huge fan of authority fallacies, but I like to meet people at their own level. I presents as "experts with a capital E" the billionaires who push the climate change hoax on stupes.
If sea levels are about to rise at any minute thanks to climate change, explain to the board why the world's biggest financial institutions are still investing TRILLIONS at sea level and insuring those investments.
Explain why virtually every major public figure pushing climate change on your stupid *** lives in a mansion on the beach, you **** low IQ goon.
Well, at least you have humor. Not much perspicacity - but they say laughter is the best medicine.Punch » 21 Mar 2023, 11:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't make me bring Greta and her legion of Climate Scientists to the table, because I will.
A lot of blah blah (with, admittedly, some irrelevant truth) that amounts to nothing. My OP's main point is that fungus is becoming more adaptable to higher temperatures due to Climate Change which will lead it to more readily inhabiting the human host. My OP is still very much open for business.Cannonpointer » 22 Mar 2023, 1:19 am » wrote: ↑ @Punch, I think it's fair to say your thread got shut the **** down. That's not much of a brag, since your OP was so **** weak, relying on the climate "expertise" of a **** emergency room doctor - a perfect example of a fatally flawed authority fallacy (not that any authority fallacy is worth a ****).
You got smacked in the gob with a **** nobel laureate patiently explaining why the climate change **** is pseudoscience. And not fer nuthin? He's an ACTUAL **** authority. More than that? He's a guy who has already made his bones. If you do a who's who on this debunked climate cahnge ****, you will find that the up and comers who fear the establishment and desperately need funding are the ones who will sell out, and the ones who have made their bones refuse to play along.
I would remind you that science has always been a whore, always been for sale, going as far back as when the pope repo'd galileo's immortal soul. We had the spectacle in my own lifetime of science whores - mostly doctors, by the **** way, like the whore you produced - shilling for big tobacco. Before the revolution, when the british east india TEA company ran the show, "science" said that coffee (the Dutch had the monopoly on coffee) would make your sons indolent and your daughters licentious. In the language of the day, "science" promised that drinking coffee would make your sons queer and your daughters sluts and whores. That ended up being a lie, in case you need to be informed.
To this day, americans favor coffee over tea, because once the founders threw off the british corportocracy, they switched to coffee as a **** you to the british east india company, which they loathed for generations of bullying and exploitation - including the use of "science" whores.
Being lied to by corrupt science whores on behalf of corporate interests is nothing new for our nation. You have to be a special kind of stupid to believe the lies thrity years out. At some **** point, you are RESPONSIBLE for being a stupid midway rube. It's not the liars, at a certain point, It's you. YOU have a duty to THINK - think like a **** man and not like a dimwit or an hysterical broad.
In thirty **** years, not one of their "models" and not one of their lying "predictions" has proved true. Not one. Currently, you are instructed to believe that sea levels are rising EXCLUSIVELY in the third world and EXCLUSIVELY where brown people live. That is stupid. That is unforgivable - being that dumb.
Wake the **** up. Man up. Think for yourself.
Gonna stop ya there, fool.
And what 'expert' would you accept to alter your confirmation bias? Oh, I know - NONE.Cannonpointer » 22 Mar 2023, 1:33 am » wrote: ↑ Gonna stop ya there, fool.
You presented an ER doctor as your "expert." He was running his dick kisser on a topic he has no degree in.
You ran an authority fallacy about a corporate scam that has been debunked by no less a figure than old Chronos himself, fool.
You ran from questions pertinent to the OP. HOW MUCH HAS THE TEMPERATURE OF THE EARTH INCREASED, AND IN WHAT TIME FRAME?
Keep ducking that question and pretending your copy paste from a **** is relevant, fool. You only prove yourself weak and ineducable.
You come in here peddling a one-sided, utterly pseudoscientific narrative from a completely partisan source, and you come out of your hole with the term confirmation bias?Punch » 22 Mar 2023, 2:29 am » wrote: ↑ And what 'expert' would you accept to alter your confirmation bias?
Wait - QUALIFIED?Punch » 22 Mar 2023, 2:29 am » wrote: ↑Oh, I know - NONE.
Did you believe Fauci? No. Was there a more qualified expert? No.
It seems a reasonable hypothesis that if the climate changed, health risks would change.Cannonpointer » 21 Mar 2023, 9:46 pm » wrote: ↑ How much has the earth warmed, and in what period of time?
Be specific. Science is specific, and you are pretending to have access to some science that we are either wilfully ignoring or ignorant of.
Either way, you should slap us with the wet cod of reality.
How much has the earth warmed, and in what period of time? Go.
Punch » 22 Mar 2023, 1:26 am » wrote: ↑ A lot of blah blah (with, admittedly, some irrelevant truth) that amounts to nothing. My OP's main point is that fungus is becoming more adaptable to higher temperatures due to Climate Change which will lead it to more readily inhabiting the human host. My OP is still very much open for business.
Look, there isn't any **** question there is a fungus among us. But his name is Punch Drunk.PastorBlast » 22 Mar 2023, 3:13 am » wrote: ↑ It seems a reasonable hypothesis that if the climate changed, health risks would change.
We were recently discussing how granny always said a cold snap would stop the spread of illness. It makes sense. It gets cold, people stay inside.
There is a good documentary on Fungi on youtube.. They say it is a third type of life on earth and played a role in evolution of plants and animals/
I do agree the OP is light on any facts.
Cannonpointer » 22 Mar 2023, 3:18 am » wrote: ↑ Look, there isn't any **** question there is a fungus among us. But his name is Punch Drunk.
You need to take your eyes off of fungus and get them on monkey pox. Isn't that what you're instructed to be hysterical about? If not, it will be soon. This ain't your father's Ebola.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJ85qlJXpiE
ChatGPT: How to Use the AI Chatbot for Free (howtogeek.com)Cannonpointer » 22 Mar 2023, 3:10 am » wrote: ↑ You come in here peddling a one-sided, utterly pseudoscientific narrative from a completely partisan source, and you come out of your hole with the term confirmation bias?
You duck questions pertinent to your thesis, and you demand to know what I might acceptd? Start by answer my question. HOW MUCH HAS THE EARTH WARMED, AND IN WHAT PERIOD OF TIME?
Stop ducking. You say the earth is warming. OKAY. How much? In what time frame?
This sounds measured and reasonable, but it's wrong.FOS » 22 Mar 2023, 3:16 am » wrote: ↑ dude...you realize it is pretty hot in different parts of the world, right? No climate change is going to turn the arctic into death valley Texas. No climate change is even going to compete with seasons concerning temperature difference. If summer wasn't good enough to create man eating virus, climate change certainly won't either. The premise is absurd.
FTFY.PastorBlast » 22 Mar 2023, 3:20 am » wrote: ↑ LOL
It could also be the vaccine EXPERIMENT has reduced human resistance. Skepticism is healthy.