Of course it is. Your climate expert ER doctor said so.
Maybe instead of running your ignorant pecker slot, you should get on there and find the evidence to support your **** OP.
Surely you can explain why
The single biggest problem with that is this:Cannonpointer » 21 Mar 2023, 11:13 pm » wrote: ↑ The Dutch live successfully below sea level - have for over 800 years. The sea is the ULTIMATE water challenge.
We are born stewards. We have sold our birth right. There is nothing necessarily wrong with building in a flood plain. Granted, the highest and best use of that land is almost certainly agricultural, not residential. But THAT is the proper argument against building on flood plains - not a water challenge. **** BEAVERS can manage water. We have engineers.
Punch » 21 Mar 2023, 8:57 pm » wrote: ↑
You cons have doomed us with your Climate Change skepticism.
'You've got to be kidding me': MSNBC host spooked by revelation that climate change is making fungus deadlier
A drug-resistant fungal infection that kills a third to three-quarters of those who are afflicted – is evolving to survive in warmer environments such as the human body and that this adaptation is a direct consequence of climate change. What we are starting to see is what is called pan-resistance. These are the fungus that are resistant to all the antifungals we have, and that's when it causes an issue. And right now, if you look at the mortality rate for people who get this, thirty to seventy-two percent, that's a huge mortality rate. So why is this so virulent?" "So here's the thing that is happening. Up until now, this type of fungus hasn't really affected us. As a matter of fact, this first started hearing about it in the Nineties, early Two-Thousands. We think that what is happening is this fungus normally can't live at the temperature inside our body. It lives cooler temperatures, and so our temperature of 98.6 was keeping it at a bay. But because of climate warming, the fungus is actually adapting to warmer temperatures, which means it's gonna be able to colonize in our bodies.
"Are we doomed?"
"Absolutely. Unless we prioritize our funding to combat Climate Change."
Wash your *** and scrub your dick, you filthy Democrat. And, make sure your wife cleans that moldy ****** of hers. The only fungus problem the world has is from filthy, 3rd-world, hippy scum like you. Not from clean-cut capitalists like me.Punch » 21 Mar 2023, 8:57 pm » wrote: ↑
You cons have doomed us with your Climate Change skepticism.
Punch » 21 Mar 2023, 8:57 pm » wrote: ↑
You cons have doomed us with your Climate Change skepticism.
'You've got to be kidding me': MSNBC host spooked by revelation that climate change is making fungus deadlier
A drug-resistant fungal infection that kills a third to three-quarters of those who are afflicted – is evolving to survive in warmer environments such as the human body and that this adaptation is a direct consequence of climate change. What we are starting to see is what is called pan-resistance. These are the fungus that are resistant to all the antifungals we have, and that's when it causes an issue. And right now, if you look at the mortality rate for people who get this, thirty to seventy-two percent, that's a huge mortality rate. So why is this so virulent?" "So here's the thing that is happening. Up until now, this type of fungus hasn't really affected us. As a matter of fact, this first started hearing about it in the Nineties, early Two-Thousands. We think that what is happening is this fungus normally can't live at the temperature inside our body. It lives cooler temperatures, and so our temperature of 98.6 was keeping it at a bay. But because of climate warming, the fungus is actually adapting to warmer temperatures, which means it's gonna be able to colonize in our bodies.
"Are we doomed?"
"Absolutely. Unless we prioritize our funding to combat Climate Change."

So reroute it over the rockies to where it is needful.DeezerShoove » 22 Mar 2023, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑ The single biggest problem with that is this:
The Mississippi has a gigantic drain basin feeding it.
Or Nevada's and California's rescue.DeezerShoove » 22 Mar 2023, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑ When weather is "wet" for a while and ground can no longer soak it up very well,
there are consequences from many hundreds of miles and many days later.
So floodplains of hundreds of square miles hold the excess waiting to find the river.
When we "control" the banks and prevent the spillover (intermittently, I might add),
we set up a river that just gets higher and higher during the odd wet season.
When those floodplains get the "flood" finally, it is bigger than if the river hadn't been contained at all.
South Dakota's water becomes Missouri's "disaster" and so on.
I'm not disagreeing. Just pointing out that people getting caught like that isn't ONE error. Building in the wrong place is not the ONLY cause. We have the capacity and the engineering chops to build any **** where we want. Including the mississippi's flood plain.DeezerShoove » 22 Mar 2023, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑ That 100 Year Flood the weather man wails about is **** stupid.
I have no sympathy for this kind of "engineering." Costly crocodile tears.
The Mighty Mississippi was just an example.
Yeah. That's why we should manage with nature and not against it. Flood plains are for growing stuff.DeezerShoove » 22 Mar 2023, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑ btw
There is an opposite effect as well. Remember all the boats stuck in mud 20 years ago?
Floodplains had held back nothing for the dry season. 100 Year Drought.![]()
Management of anything cannot be faultless. Sometimes it's just lessening the chaos.
You know the kind of question that we'd all love to see you or your idiot heroine Greta respond to?Punch » 21 Mar 2023, 11:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't make me bring Greta and her legion of Climate Scientists to the table, because I will.
Isn't it obvious to you that since it is a FACT that thousands more people die from cold than from heat every year, and that ratio would certainly increase even more if our climate warms slightly.The CDC says that the average number of deaths in January, February, and December are 8,478; 8,351; and 8,344, respectively. By contrast, the summer months of June, July, and August recorded 7,298; 7,157; and 7,158 average daily deaths, respectively.
The human body's operating temperature has not changed since its inception...Punch » 21 Mar 2023, 8:57 pm » wrote: ↑
You cons have doomed us with your Climate Change skepticism.
'You've got to be kidding me': MSNBC host spooked by revelation that climate change is making fungus deadlier
A drug-resistant fungal infection that kills a third to three-quarters of those who are afflicted – is evolving to survive in warmer environments such as the human body and that this adaptation is a direct consequence of climate change. What we are starting to see is what is called pan-resistance. These are the fungus that are resistant to all the antifungals we have, and that's when it causes an issue. And right now, if you look at the mortality rate for people who get this, thirty to seventy-two percent, that's a huge mortality rate. So why is this so virulent?" "So here's the thing that is happening. Up until now, this type of fungus hasn't really affected us. As a matter of fact, this first started hearing about it in the Nineties, early Two-Thousands. We think that what is happening is this fungus normally can't live at the temperature inside our body. It lives cooler temperatures, and so our temperature of 98.6 was keeping it at a bay. But because of climate warming, the fungus is actually adapting to warmer temperatures, which means it's gonna be able to colonize in our bodies.
"Are we doomed?"
"Absolutely. Unless we prioritize our funding to combat Climate Change."
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=T8XeDvKqI4ECannonpointer » 21 Mar 2023, 9:46 pm » wrote: ↑ How much has the earth warmed, and in what period of time?
Be specific. Science is specific, and you are pretending to have access to some science that we are either wilfully ignoring or ignorant of.
Either way, you should slap us with the wet cod of reality.
How much has the earth warmed, and in what period of time? Go.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom And on the flip side, what is the natural nominal temperature of the earth ?Cannonpointer » 21 Mar 2023, 11:16 pm » wrote: ↑ I repeat:
How much has the earth warmed, and in what period of time?
Be specific. Science is specific, and you are pretending to have access to some science that we are either wilfully ignoring or ignorant of.
Either way, you should slap us with the wet cod of reality.
How much has the earth warmed, and in what period of time? Go.
Edit - wait, I get it. You're just a dreck poster.
If you were a rightie, you would be slobbering out a Heritage piece or some horse **** from CATO.
I get it. Back on the dick, beta.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom lol. To all you men who don't know how to shop?SJConspirator » 22 Mar 2023, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Just keep ordering overseas shipping from China, the emissions help our atmosphere beathe better.
NEVER buy food or clothing that was made locally. Every article of clothing you buy should have generated 1.5 tonnes of co2 during transit.
If you buy local, your causing climate catastrophe that will turn the earth into Waterworld. Kevin Costner will be happy to reprise his role, but it will suck for the rest of us
I buy cool **** from China so that my money doesn't go to fund American Unions.SJConspirator » 22 Mar 2023, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Just keep ordering overseas shipping from China, the emissions help our atmosphere beathe better.
NEVER buy food or clothing that was made locally. Every article of clothing you buy should have generated 1.5 tonnes of co2 during transit.
If you buy local, your causing climate catastrophe that will turn the earth into Waterworld. Kevin Costner will be happy to reprise his role, but it will suck for the rest of us
Skans » 22 Mar 2023, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I buy cool **** from China so that my money doesn't go to fund American Unions.
That is one of the questions the "science" supporter will flee.ROG62 » 22 Mar 2023, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ And on the flip side, what is the natural nominal temperature of the earth ?
No, they started a pandemic by deliberately releasing a low grade coronavirus altered with gain of function research money paid by the US government. Tales of bat or dog soup as the origin are false.Punch » 21 Mar 2023, 10:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Until recently the Chinese took antitbiotics for EVERYTHING, even headaches.
Damn chinks are **** the world over.
They started the pandemic by eating Rover.