Myth. Politically homeless racist democrats in the South remained democrats. They didn't become Republicans. When the racist vote was consequential, racists voted democrat. The view that Africanized Americans are less than fully human certainly remains unchanged.PastorBlast » 24 Mar 2023, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ That's fine.. as long as you also remember to also teach that Democrats and Republicans flipped ideologies during the Jim Crow Era.
Woodrow Wilson was pre-FDR, retard.PastorBlast » 24 Mar 2023, 5:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Woodrow Wilson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTR_h0vT6eg
Cannonpointer » 24 Mar 2023, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Woodrow Wilson was pre-FDR, retard.
That means TODAY'S dems still own Jim Crow, you dumb ***, since the switch occurred BEFORE Jim Crow was ended by Republicans.
Derp.
They believe africanized murkins are too stupid and broke-dick to acquire ID.Neo » 24 Mar 2023, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Myth. Politically homeless racist democrats in the South remained democrats. They didn't become Republicans. When the racist vote was consequential, racists voted democrat. The view that Africanized Americans are less than fully human certainly remains unchanged.
You're not gonna back your retarded claim, fruitcake.
Cannonpointer » 24 Mar 2023, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑ You're not gonna back your retarded claim, fruitcake.
If the parties switched under WILSON, the Democrats of today are still the party of Jim Crow, you retard.
Looks like you've found your level, panty dancer.PastorBlast » 24 Mar 2023, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑The N word sucksCannonpointer » 24 Mar 2023, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑ You're not gonna back your retarded claim, fruitcake.
If the parties switched under WILSON, the Democrats of today are still the party of Jim Crow, you retard.
Cannonpointer » 24 Mar 2023, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑ They believe africanized murkins are too stupid and broke-dick to acquire ID.
And BELIEVING THIS, they demanded those WITHOUT ID proving their vax status be Jim Crowed out of public spaces.
Dems did not want dirty ****** in their restaurants. They have not changed - they are still the party of Jim Crow.
yep, one and the same!Cannonpointer » 24 Mar 2023, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ You mean the guy who could always count on Joe Biden's vote against school integration?
because, according to Biden, he was clean and and could talk. The Demonrats finally found black guy that they could use to further their agenda.SJConspirator » 24 Mar 2023, 7:48 pm » wrote: ↑ why did the Dems, and not Repubs, elect a black president?
1. They didn't - they NOMINATED him. Dems do not have the numbers to elect a pResident.SJConspirator » 24 Mar 2023, 7:48 pm » wrote: ↑ why did the Dems, and not Repubs, elect a black president?
Cannonpointer » 24 Mar 2023, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. They didn't - they NOMINATED him. Dems do not have the numbers to elect a pResident.
2. They nominated him to stop hitlery from STEALING the nomination. She learned how to stop that next time.
3. Tokenism proves the OPPOSITE of anti-racism. Throwing *** out of eateries is not erased by one token.
I won't argue against the thesis that dems practice tokenism. I just think it's racist. I would also note that the repukes had **** the household pet in front of the inlaws on the year that obama first won - and they tone-deafly ran a wall street raider against him in 2012, on the heels of wallstreet **** raiding us. Bush elected obama.SJConspirator » 24 Mar 2023, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. The Democrat electorate voted him in, I suspect, far more than Republican voters.
When repukes appoint blacks, it's typically based on their skills and backgrounds. What democrats have done for decades was well and truly exposed by Biden, who decided the race and gender of his VP BEFORE he decided who the PERSON would be.SJConspirator » 24 Mar 2023, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ 3. Good point, the Republicans have appointed more black cabinet members I believe. Condi Rice, etc..

I appreciate the critique.Cannonpointer » 24 Mar 2023, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Looks like you've found your level, panty dancer.
Questioned closely, you respond with retarded **** and nonsequiturs.
Your narratives are just memes that you've been handed and cannot defend.
You talking about your ancestors again.roadkill » 24 Mar 2023, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ "real stuff"...you mean like the democrats who were behind the slavery and after the slaves were freed the dems and their KKK went around murdering black and white republicans. You mean that kind of "real stuff"?
You can get your skin as thick as your noggin by rubbing **** on it nightly.PastorBlast » 25 Mar 2023, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑ I appreciate the critique.
I am trying to keep an open mind.
I hear the N word in my current workplace a lot. I have been told I am no better than one. My skin is a little thicker since working there.
One of tge writers of the bill voted against it.PastorBlast » 24 Mar 2023, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ When asked about the five Republican votes against the bill, McCarthy contended that “Democrats are too extreme to believe that parents should have a say” in their children’s education.
https://apnews.com/article/parents-righ ... cb7b2cc8f4
House GOP passes parents’ rights bill in clash over schools
Meanwhile we forget to teach kids real stuff that will help them be successful. There is a reason Walmart doesn't sell telescopes.