Liberal Forum

DeezerShoove » 25 Mar 2023, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 9:06 am

That is such a tiresome unoriginal thought...

   

...[if it wasn't for tiresome unoriginal [and monetarily ignorant] thoughts you'd be thoughtless, puppet-sucker!]       

Trumprules » 25 Mar 2023, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 9:27 am

Lets be clear the old southern democrats are republican now.

..let's be clear, the old and new democrats and the old and new republicans have all been $hit-puppet$... wordle... 
 

Pastafarian » 25 Mar 2023, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 8:23 am

Besides southern Republicans voted against tge Civil Rights Act. 

https://www.quora.com/Who-voted-against ... 64?share=1

Black folk used to vote Republican when the racists were in the Democratic Party. Now we vote against the racists in the Republican Party.

              Again, collectively a higher percentage of Republicans voted Yes in favor of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, but the Left continue to push the myth of the "big switch" rather than own up to the fact that absolutely nothing has been more toxic or destructive to ****** than the Democrats of old -- the Democrats of new -- and the post Martin Luther King Negro leadership .... 

             The proof of this is in the return investment on 90% of ****** throwing their votes at the Democrats for the last 60 years... Since 1964 ****** have pretty much exclusively entrusted the Dem Party as their caregivers and make things right --  yet have steadily declined into the death spiral they are in today, reduced to the status of dependent special needs children... You want to take credit, but not responsibility or blame at the same time ... You don't get to have it both ways...  

 

They never switched. The dims just cloaked their racism under another disguise. A snake sheds its skin many times in its life, but it's still always the same snake. 

Trumprules » 25 Mar 2023, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 10:46 am

The old democratic kkk members fought for states rights and against federalist. Which Lincoln used federal power and fought against states rights and for federalism. Sort of like today's liberals do. And the republican champion anti federalist powers and state right like the old guard southern kkk members

Lincoln was a Republican. Seriously, what is wrong with you?

Trumprules » 25 Mar 2023, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 10:51 am

Yes and a federalist that fought against states rights. Like today's liberals. 

Incorrect on both accounts. Lincoln believed it was up to the states to determine who can exercise what rights. Unlike what progressives do today. You tyrants want a one world government. 


I win again. 

Trumprules » 25 Mar 2023, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 10:56 am

The old Confederate democrats fought for states rights. The state right to enslave other people. You can't be this stupid can you. And Lincoln was a federalist liberal they called the black Republicans after the war. Why cause the republican fought hard to give blacks the right to vote and to property.

*******. I am referring to after the war. God man. Lincoln wanted the slaves freed. He did that. However, he left it up to the states to determine who gets what rights within each state. 

Trumprules » 25 Mar 2023, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 11:09 am

Yeah after the war democrats stopped blacks from voting and railed against the Republicans stationing federal troops in the southern state to force the black vote and freedom of the blacks. The republican party or the *** party as the democratic state rights confederates call them started reconstruction  a federal program by the Radical liberal Republicans. Or *** party.

Do you know that you just agreed with me? Or are you just copying/pasting **** from the internet without reading it?

Trumprules » 25 Mar 2023, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 11:13 am

Did you go to private school? Cause you don't know jack.

I owned you. 
 Actually, you owned yourself, but I'll take the win. 


Vegas: 165
Trumprules: 0

Trumprules » 25 Mar 2023, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 9:27 am

They just disappeared. And why does the Republicans only have one or two blacks in the party then. Is it because they can't find blacks to run. Because democrats have all kinds of blacks in their party and has had them in leadership.  Lets be clear the old southern democrats are republican now.

Propagandists like yourself convinced blacks that Republicans are racist. Democrats expanded welfare, replaced black fathers with government checks then used Republican objections to these giveaways as evidence of racism. 
 
 

Trumprules » 25 Mar 2023, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 11:16 am

I said the same thing three times and you disagreed with me two out the three times. I'm going to copy this thread and show black vegetable and all the guys over at the other forum this. We will laugh and laugh at you.

You didn't say the same thing. You don't even know what you were saying. 

Here: Go ahead and copy it over there: example.com?q=

       
 

peepee » 25 Mar 2023, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 9:20 am

   

...[if it wasn't for tiresome unoriginal [and monetarily ignorant] thoughts you'd be thoughtless, puppet-sucker!]     

You are stupider than BlaVe was.
He tried the stalking thing too and couldn't admit he was doing it.
Pathetic behavior. Welcome to his club.

Neo » 25 Mar 2023, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 8:17 am

Spent years in the South. Republicans were still called Yankees. The idea a southern black hating democrat would become a Yankee is ridiculous on its face. Racist democrats from the 60s and 70s became politically homeless, they didn't become Republicans.

You truly know nothing. 
 

Kobia2 » 25 Mar 2023, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 10:41 am

              Again, collectively a higher percentage of Republicans voted Yes in favor of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, but the Left continue to push the myth of the "big switch" rather than own up to the fact that absolutely nothing has been more toxic or destructive to ****** than the Democrats of old -- the Democrats of new -- and the post Martin Luther King Negro leadership .... 

             The proof of this is in the return investment on 90% of ****** throwing their votes at the Democrats for the last 60 years... Since 1964 ****** have pretty much exclusively entrusted the Dem Party as their caregivers and make things right --  yet have steadily declined into the death spiral they are in today, reduced to the status of dependent special needs children... You want to take credit, but not responsibility or blame at the same time ... You don't get to have it both ways...  

yes bcuz Republicans had little power in the south. But every Republican senator from the south voted against the Civil Rights bill. 

Black folks whom once voted Republicans observed the Republican Party becoming more and more racist. 

Republican policies like the war on drugs, the war on terror, voting rights has diminished their standing in the Black community. When you implement racist policies expect backlash from those y’all want to oppress. 

Republicans wanted the southern white supremacist vote more than the Black vote. 

Pastafarian » 25 Mar 2023, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 11:49 am

You truly know nothing.

You think men can become women so obviously you can believe sons of the confederacy can change into Yankee Republicans. 
 

Pastafarian » 25 Mar 2023, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 11:58 am

yes bcuz Republicans had little power in the south. But every Republican senator from the south voted against the Civil Rights bill. 

Black folks whom once voted Republicans observed the Republican Party becoming more and more racist. 

Republican policies like the war on drugs, the war on terror, voting rights has diminished their standing in the Black community. When you implement racist policies expect backlash from those y’all want to oppress. 

Republicans wanted the southern white supremacist vote more than the Black vote.

The Clinton's promoted that black super predator nonsense pretty hard. After supporting policies that destroyed the black family. 
 

Neo » 25 Mar 2023, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 12:01 pm

The Clinton's promoted that black super predator nonsense pretty hard. After supporting policies that destroyed the black family.

The Clintons were repeating the Republican rhetoric at the time. 

Neocons got to stick together. 

Which policies destroyed the Black family? Lemme guess-welfare.

You would be wrong again. What destroyed the Black family is over incarceration for petty crimes and lots of framing of innocent Black people. 
 

Pastafarian » 25 Mar 2023, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 12:07 pm

The Clintons were repeating the Republican rhetoric at the time. 

Neocons got to stick together. 

Which policies destroyed the Black family? Lemme guess-welfare.

You would be wrong again. What destroyed the Black family is over incarceration for petty crimes and lots of framing of innocent Black people.

There was no over incarceration. War on drugs was idiocy but people involved in their trafficking knew the risk, they did what they did for the rewards in taking the risk. 

Lbjs great society programs destroyed the black family in ways that even slavery couldn't. 
 

Trumprules » 25 Mar 2023, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 12:09 pm

Have you seen the videos of cops planting drugs on blacks. It's crazy.

I am sure planting drugs happened on exceedingly rare occasions. Listen to any gangsta rap song and its pretty clear where the thugs are getting their Benjamins. Has **** all to do with the police. 
 

Neo » 25 Mar 2023, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2023, 12:17 pm

There was no over incarceration. War on drugs was idiocy but people involved in their trafficking knew the risk, they did what they did for the rewards in taking the risk. 

Lbjs great society programs destroyed the black family in ways that even slavery couldn't.

You lie. 

There was and still is over incarceration, know nothing. 

That LBJ great society programs destroying Black families is a load of ****, you have to repeat or you look stupid.