Coke hit epidemic levels in the early 70s. Reagan had nothing to do with enterprising black dealers creating crack cocaine. Why are liberals always trying to diminish the achievements of African Americans? They invented crack, it was cottage industry so successful that whites feared it would spread to their drug consumers so they made disparate punitive sentencing. Give blacks the credit they deserve for creating crack, bigot.Trumprules » 25 Mar 2023, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh sorry I thought it was Reagan that started the cartels in Mexico and South America that flooded the streets are America with coke and crack. Oh yeah I'm correct about that. Never mind.
Obesity kills almost as many blacks as abortion.Trumprules » 25 Mar 2023, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah the starve the blacks program in the south didn't work.
now that is funny. Democrats just fix their convention so you can't vote for anyone else!Trumprules » 25 Mar 2023, 3:34 am » wrote: ↑ she is doing such a good job you can't remember her name. You will vote for who fox news and the right wing tells you to vote for. As always.
...oh, he can be waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more stoooooooooooooooooooopid than that!!...Trumprules » 25 Mar 2023, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ The old Confederate democrats fought for states rights. The state right to enslave other people. You can't be this stupid can you.
...don't sell yourself short, republic#nt prohibitionist...your 'war on some drugs' really $piced/spice$ thing$ up!!!...Neo » 25 Mar 2023, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Coke hit epidemic levels in the early 70s. Reagan had nothing to do with enterprising black dealers creating crack cocaine. Why are liberals always trying to diminish the achievements of African Americans? They invented crack, it was cottage industry so successful that whites feared it would spread to their drug consumers so they made disparate punitive sentencing. Give blacks the credit they deserve for creating crack, bigot.
...are you aware of what your republic#nts did to ron paul?sunburn » 25 Mar 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ now that is funny. Democrats just fix their convention so you can't vote for anyone else!
SJConspirator » 24 Mar 2023, 11:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Mainly, this guy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond
When Strom Thurmond changed his affiliation from Democrat to Republican in 1964, it was a protest against the civil rights movement. Many other Democrats followed suit
...i heartily encourage
Roe was overturned despite the tantrums. Blue states still have ready access to baby butchery, states where populations are opposed to infanticide have seen some restrictions on the practice. It's a non issue.peepee » 26 Mar 2023, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ ...i heartily encourage![]()
![]()
you republic#nt monetary ignoramuses to get waaaaaaaaaaaay louder in support of abortion prohibitition!!!
![]()
...it'll do wonders for your vote totals!!!![]()
![]()
sunburn » 25 Mar 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ now that is funny. Democrats just fix their convention so you can't vote for anyone else!
...somewhat specifically, what abortion laws and penalties do you favor/propose?Neo » 26 Mar 2023, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ Roe was overturned despite the tantrums. Blue states still have ready access to baby butchery, states where populations are opposed to infanticide have seen some restrictions on the practice. It's a non issue.
...the 'tantrums' have not even begun, republic#nt abortion prohibitionist... [and monetary ignoramus]
Same as any other homicide. There is justified and unjustified. No justification it's murder.peepee » 26 Mar 2023, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ ...somewhat specifically, what abortion laws and penalties do you favor/propose?:
No matter how many times a person changes their mind, they are always the same person that changes their mind nobody serving a reality wants them on their one sided narrative again.SJConspirator » 24 Mar 2023, 11:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Mainly, this guy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond
When Strom Thurmond changed his affiliation from Democrat to Republican in 1964, it was a protest against the civil rights movement. Many other Democrats followed suit
Neo » 25 Mar 2023, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Coke hit epidemic levels in the early 70s. Reagan had nothing to do with enterprising black dealers creating crack cocaine. Why are liberals always trying to diminish the achievements of African Americans? They invented crack, it was cottage industry so successful that whites feared it would spread to their drug consumers so they made disparate punitive sentencing. Give blacks the credit they deserve for creating crack, bigot.
Sure.
Clarence Isaiah Abrams? It was made by creative black folk. There are several documentaries on the topic with first hand accounts.
...so 1st degree murder and life in prison/death penalty for the woman, right, you dense @sshole? [and monetary ignoramus]Neo » 26 Mar 2023, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ Same as any other homicide. There is justified and unjustified. No justification it's murder.
Same penalties as any other homicide. Murder is Murder, not sure we should discriminate based on age or geography. Doctors and clinicians would be the killers, mom would be guilty of contracting a homicide.peepee » 26 Mar 2023, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑ ...so 1st degree murder and life in prison/death penalty for the woman, right, you dense @sshole? [and monetary ignoramus]
...let's hear you republic#nts make that case loudly and proudly!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
...i believe they call that 1st degree [pre-meditated] murder...right? ...life in prison or the death penalty, right? [unless of course it's one of your women-kin, right?Neo » 26 Mar 2023, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Same penalties as any other homicide. Murder is Murder, not sure we should discriminate based on age or geography. Doctors and clinicians would be the killers, mom would be guilty of contracting a homicide.