We know what you believe is "fun"Xavier_Onassis » 05 Apr 2023, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑ You do not understand anything.
Disney is a threat only to your pocketbook if you visit a Disney park.
If Disney said it did not support LGBTQ rights, it would lose the talented employees that make it fun to visit.
Xavier_Onassis » 05 Mar 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Just showing children his dick isn't hurting anyone. It's obvious he's only having some fun.
Money and profits are always an object when it comes to publicly traded companies. Otherwise, they will be targets for hostile takeovers. Look at the activist investors and then determine how much power they have within Disney. That's where I'd start. My guess is there are some real hard-core leftists who have gained power in that company and that's where the problems are stemming from.SJConspirator » 04 Apr 2023, 6:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Why are they killing their own prosperity? Why ruin your brand just to cater to a few freaks? I'll tell you why.
Money is no object.
FRUIT CAKE
Unless, of course, you're invested in iShares Core S&P 500 EFT, Government Pension Fund, Vanguard Growth Index Fund, Vanguard Institutional Index Fund or a few others.Xavier_Onassis » 05 Apr 2023, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑ You do not understand anything.
Disney is a threat only to your pocketbook if you visit a Disney park.
If Disney said it did not support LGBTQ rights, it would lose the talented employees that make it fun to visit.
Skans » 05 Apr 2023, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ Money and profits are always an object when it comes to publicly traded companies. Otherwise, they will be targets for hostile takeovers. Look at the activist investors and then determine how much power they have within Disney. That's where I'd start. My guess is there are some real hard-core leftists who have gained power in that company and that's where the problems are stemming from.
Yes, real losses. Real losses Trump suffered from bad timing on some real estate investments. Of course he carried those losses forward for use in the future. If you were to ask Trump which he take if he could go back in time with today's knowledge and do it over again:SJConspirator » 05 Apr 2023, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑movie production costs that exceed the box office revenue from said movie are tax deductible. Trump nullified his tax bill by claiming massive losses.
That is different from the Trump scenario above. I do think in some situations people with more money than they could ever spend will engage in destructive acts through which they might lose some value or money. But, I also think they are taking a big risk by doing this, because if they are on the board of directors, they are acting in disregard of their investors. They could be prosecuted and/or sued.You dont think it benefits oligarchs to put turds into the culture and write off the bad debt?
Trumprules » 17 Apr 2023, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe it's deeply held beliefs. Just maybe. Maybe they think that these people need protection from the pitch fork masses.
I believe this as well.SJConspirator » 05 Apr 2023, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑ This is why Disney is so dangerous now. It promotes warped views, twists the development of healthy sexuality into depraved perversion, and its aimed squarely at the children
Shut up ..Xavier_Onassis » 05 Apr 2023, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑ You do not understand anything.
Disney is a threat only to your pocketbook if you visit a Disney park.
If Disney said it did not support LGBTQ rights, it would lose the talented employees that make it fun to visit.
I believe this as well.Skans » 05 Apr 2023, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ Money and profits are always an object when it comes to publicly traded companies. Otherwise, they will be targets for hostile takeovers. Look at the activist investors and then determine how much power they have within Disney. That's where I'd start. My guess is there are some real hard-core leftists who have gained power in that company and that's where the problems are stemming from.
I think a lot of it has to do with Corporations thinking they are getting ahead of a curve .....that acrually doesn't really exist by hiring woke marketing firms and consultants that also have no clue that they are unpopular to most of society .......but are promoting this because they think they are trendy and every one is on board .....DeezerShoove » 17 Apr 2023, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ I believe this as well.
It is a compound problem. People in general now openly talk about what offends them expecting the world around them to adapt to their weaknesses. Being offended is a sign of weakness after all.
Now that we can all openly be weak together, fragile in a specific way per individual, anyone crying about something is important. Couple that with leftists and "yes men", you breed a toxic corporate stew. The strong people are now kooks and when they dismiss this progressive idiocy, they are deemed irrelevant by the corporate bubble people. Spineless people go along to get along, sycophants actively go against nature and suck activist Kool Aid, stupid people don't care and seek immediate gratification, etc.
The tidal wave to a "better society" is underway. They know they have to outlast us. We will age out. Stupid people are being groomed every day as replacements.
Fun would be seeing Donald, Mickey, Goofy and Pluto and taking photos with them, moron.