Irrelevant....Trumprules » 04 Apr 2023, 11:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Liberal Milwaukee County Judge Janet Protasiewicz crushed her opponent on Tuesday in Wisconsin's Supreme Court election. The outcome of the contest will likely determine the fate of abortion rights and other key issues in the top presidential battleground.2 hours ago
https://www.politico.com › news
The conservative Supreme Court Judge lost in a landslide.
Not too many Lib Victories coming to my State of Florida ---- because as our Governor says, "Florida is where Woke comes to die".... Y'all are on the **** ropes down here son ---- LOLTrumprules » 04 Apr 2023, 11:57 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm sure it is. More wins for liberals are coming. Don't stop what you cons are doing. You're doing great.
Odd that Charlie Crist doesn't share your sentiment --- especially since he lost by the razor-thin margin of 57% - 42% .... He should have demanded a recount!
That's okay, ****** - Kyle Rittenhouse still controls the skreets.

Keep grooming, loser. It's a great look.Trumprules » 04 Apr 2023, 11:57 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm sure it is. More wins for liberals are coming. Don't stop what you cons are doing. You're doing great.
Kobia2 » 04 Apr 2023, 11:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Irrelevant....
Honestly, it's never bothered me when Liberals abort their offspring... In fact I encourage the practice.
Yea blacks aborting more govt tit suckers what’s not to like bout thatKobia2 » 04 Apr 2023, 11:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Irrelevant....
Honestly, it's never bothered me when Liberals abort their offspring... In fact I encourage the practice.
Your boyfriend?
So does your wife!
So you're OK with judges who have a political agenda. Remember that the next time SCOTUS rules differently than you want them to rule.Trumprules » 04 Apr 2023, 11:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Keep up the good work guys. You worked hard for this. Lol
Seriously though...... Do we really need these creatures breeding?....BuckNaked » 05 Apr 2023, 5:44 am » wrote: ↑ Yea blacks aborting more govt tit suckers what’s not to like bout that

They have done that quite often. States that elect judges EXPECT them to be both judicial and political.ConsRule » 05 Apr 2023, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑ So you're OK with judges who have a political agenda. Remember that the next time SCOTUS rules differently than you want them to rule.
yikes bunch of fugglesKobia2 » 05 Apr 2023, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ Seriously though...... Do we really need these creatures breeding?....
I think Rep. Mat Gaetz said it best when asked by a Reporter his thoughts on the Pro-Abortion Activists who he called fat & ugly being offended by his comments...
Not without a new court case. If the maps have already been signed off on and passed judicial review they have to wait 10 years.Trumprules » 05 Apr 2023, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ The good news is she can reverse the gerrymandering in Wisconsin.
that IS good news!Trumprules » 05 Apr 2023, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ The good news is she can reverse the gerrymandering in Wisconsin.
You're wrong. And a new court case would be easy to file... and the new Wisconsin Supreme Court could simply throw out the previous redistricting plan and send it back to the legislature.ConsRule » 05 Apr 2023, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Not without a new court case. If the maps have already been signed off on and passed judicial review they have to wait 10 years.
Besides, the only people who whine about gerrymandering are the people not drawing the maps.