Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Liberals just picked up the majority with a huge win in Wisconsin. Liberal now control the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Liberals just picked up the majority with a huge win in Wisconsin. Liberal now control the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
By Kobia2
4 Apr 2023 11:50 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
5 Apr 2023 1:09 pm
Wins for liberals? How is not enforcing the law a win? Chicago just elected another mayor who is a carbon copy of the last idiot. How is letting crime go rampant a win? And as far as manipulating politics through state supreme courts how is that a win? Idiot.Trumprules » 04 Apr 2023, 11:57 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm sure it is. More wins for liberals are coming. Don't stop what you cons are doing. You're doing great.
5 Apr 2023 1:10 pm
Or to better your cause gerrymander in the favor of leftist scum. Still corrupt and you love it.Trumprules » 05 Apr 2023, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ The good news is she can reverse the gerrymandering in Wisconsin.
5 Apr 2023 1:18 pm
The court cannot rule on something that has not been brought before it in an appeal. Besides, the US Supreme Court has ruled that drawing congressional district lines to benefit a particular political party is not necessarily unconstitutional.maineman » 05 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑ You're wrong. And a new court case would be easy to file... and the new Wisconsin Supreme Court could simply throw out the previous redistricting plan and send it back to the legislature.
5 Apr 2023 1:30 pm
Democrats in Wisconsin can file a court case. It goes up the line to the new State Supreme Court... and THEY get to decide if THEIR state's redistricting plan violates THEIR state's constitution. SCOTUS has **** all to say about it.ConsRule » 05 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ The court cannot rule on something that has not been brought before it in an appeal. Besides, the US Supreme Court has ruled that drawing congressional district lines to benefit a particular political party is not necessarily unconstitutional.
5 Apr 2023 1:31 pm
oh...I get it... gerrymandering by the right is good and virtuous... gerrymandering by the left is corrupt?FredH » 05 Apr 2023, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Or to better your cause gerrymander in the favor of leftist scum. Still corrupt and you love it.
idiot.
5 Apr 2023 1:42 pm
Keep telling yourself that, *******. A state constitution cannot contradict the US Constitution. Ever hear of the supremacy clause. Besides, the districts also impact the US Congress...making it an issue that can go before SCOTUS.maineman » 05 Apr 2023, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Democrats in Wisconsin can file a court case. It goes up the line to the new State Supreme Court... and THEY get to decide if THEIR state's redistricting plan violates THEIR state's constitution. SCOTUS has **** all to say about it.
5 Apr 2023 1:45 pm
Nope...the only people who whine about gerrymandering are the people not drawing the lines. And it's possible to "beat" gerrymandering. For decades, Texas was controlled by demoncraps with an iron grip. Over time, they did what they usually do and **** up. People began voting for more conservative people and now Texas is a solid red state.maineman » 05 Apr 2023, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ oh...I get it... gerrymandering by the right is good and virtuous... gerrymandering by the left is corrupt?
idiot.
5 Apr 2023 2:05 pm
Retard gerrymandering at all is corrupt. Figures your senile mind wouldn't see the point.maineman » 05 Apr 2023, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ oh...I get it... gerrymandering by the right is good and virtuous... gerrymandering by the left is corrupt?
idiot.
5 Apr 2023 2:42 pm
Trumprules » 04 Apr 2023, 11:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Liberal Milwaukee County Judge Janet Protasiewicz crushed her opponent on Tuesday in Wisconsin's Supreme Court election. The outcome of the contest will likely determine the fate of abortion rights and other key issues in the top presidential battleground.2 hours ago
https://www.politico.com › news
The conservative Supreme Court Judge lost in a landslide.
I live in Va. Doesn't do anything to me.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
5 Apr 2023 2:49 pm
but you're OK when republicans do it?FredH » 05 Apr 2023, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Retard gerrymandering at all is corrupt. Figures your senile mind wouldn't see the point.
5 Apr 2023 2:51 pm
And in the case of Wisconsin, the democrats can now bring a case to the state supreme court and know their odds of a favorable ruling are better.ConsRule » 05 Apr 2023, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope...the only people who whine about gerrymandering are the people not drawing the lines. And it's possible to "beat" gerrymandering. For decades, Texas was controlled by demoncraps with an iron grip. Over time, they did what they usually do and **** up. People began voting for more conservative people and now Texas is a solid red state.
5 Apr 2023 2:52 pm
State Supreme courts can and have tossed out redistricting plans in the past. They will undoubtedly do so in the future. Methinks Wisconsin may be next..ConsRule » 05 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Keep telling yourself that, *******. A state constitution cannot contradict the US Constitution. Ever hear of the supremacy clause. Besides, the districts also impact the US Congress...making it an issue that can go before SCOTUS.
*******.
5 Apr 2023 3:01 pm
The maps have already been to the State Supreme Court. It will take a new case...and this is very important...based on a new reason to challenge the maps.maineman » 05 Apr 2023, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ State Supreme courts can and have tossed out redistricting plans in the past. They will undoubtedly do so in the future. Methinks Wisconsin may be next..
*******.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/re ... wisconsin/
On March 3, the Wisconsin Supreme Court chose a map drawn by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers as the Badger State’s new congressional plan, spurning a map drawn by Republicans in the legislature. Justice Brian Hagedorn sided with the court’s three liberal justices in the 4-3 ruling.
The new map, however, still favors Republicans, a consequence of the court’s earlier ruling that it would not consider partisanship when choosing the map and would instead try to make as few changes as possible. The new map has six Republican-leaning seats and only two Democratic-leaning seats, along with an efficiency gap of R+27. However, the new map does make the light-red 1st District significantly more competitive than the Republican plan would have — a partisan lean of R+6 instead of R+14.
Wisconsin redistricting fell to the state Supreme Court after Evers vetoed the Republican-drawn map in November. GOP members of Congress appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the map, but on March 23, the Supreme Court denied their request, clearing the way for the map to be used in the 2022 midterms.
5 Apr 2023 3:21 pm
I'm sure you're not an election denier.
5 Apr 2023 3:51 pm
The crime rate and drug addiction on my state of Washington is a huge win for liberals.Trumprules » 04 Apr 2023, 11:57 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm sure it is. More wins for liberals are coming. Don't stop what you cons are doing. You're doing great.
Who is online
In total there are 5129 users online :: 12 registered, 14 bots, and 5103 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, Beekeeper, jerra b, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, nefarious101, Huey
Bots: Adsbot, DuckDuckBot, proximic, CriteoBot, okhttp, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, Baiduspider, curl/7, ADmantX, Googlebot