I also see the words "contains bio-engineered ingredients" on labels.LowIQTrash » 05 Apr 2023, 2:16 am » wrote: ↑ Since 1994, when GMOs were legalized for human consumption, "they" have come out with countless """studies""" claiming GMOs are "safe."
And if you disagree you are a "quack" or "conspirasee theeowrist."
Please with a show of hands reveal yourselves if you accept these conclusions derived from aforementioned """studies."""
edit: 1992 legalized, 1994 first GMO "food" approved for sale in supermarkets

Graphting different varietis of plants to one another is GMO. You really need to learn what vocabulary does for and against each person alive. Means to communicate between people in same population, way to define people to get them ignoring how evolving works naturally.LowIQTrash » 05 Apr 2023, 2:16 am » wrote: ↑ Since 1994, when GMOs were legalized for human consumption, "they" have come out with countless """studies""" claiming GMOs are "safe."
And if you disagree you are a "quack" or "conspirasee theeowrist."
Please with a show of hands reveal yourselves if you accept these conclusions derived from aforementioned """studies."""
edit: 1992 legalized, 1994 first GMO "food" approved for sale in supermarkets
LowIQTrash » 05 Apr 2023, 2:16 am » wrote: ↑ Since 1994, when GMOs were legalized for human consumption, "they" have come out with countless """studies""" claiming GMOs are "safe."
And if you disagree you are a "quack" or "conspirasee theeowrist."
Please with a show of hands reveal yourselves if you accept these conclusions derived from aforementioned """studies."""
edit: 1992 legalized, 1994 first GMO "food" approved for sale in supermarkets
...i suspect that a lot of the cognitive deficiencies of you republicrats results from blood-brain-barrier perforation caused by aspartame, etc... seriously...DeezerShoove » 05 Apr 2023, 5:15 am » wrote: ↑ I also see the words "contains bio-engineered ingredients" on labels.
Is that the same as GMO? It's all over the foods we eat.
Like high fructose corn syrup... in dill pickles, for chrissakes. A non-sweet product has a sweetener.
So, GMO studies making the claim we are eating safe Frankenfoods? We have been for 30 years.
"All natural" is a scam too. Arsenic and rat turds are natural.
You just walk around with a chip on your shoulder... or is that a Cheese Puff?peepee » 05 Apr 2023, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ ...i suspect that a lot of the cognitive deficiencies of you republicrats results from blood-brain-barrier perforation caused by aspartame, etc... seriously...
...remember, what you are is what you eat...do you want to go through life as a cheese-dog?... [and a puppet-sucking monetary ignoramus]
Then how come the American *** problem...err population is exploding? Abortions can't keep up with birth rates.Bob » 05 Apr 2023, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ "Genetically Modified foods, according to researchers, are becoming a real problem when it comes to fertility, causing an influx in worldwide infertility rates. Since the 1970s alone, sperm counts among the world’s male population have declined as much as 40-50%, according to some studies. GMO foods may be just one of the reasons, warn those studying the phenomenon."
No need for worry leaders will solve the problem by bringing in millions of new people from non GMO food and non medical experimentation areas.
Genetic modified grapes of wrath.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzLC48jZPrc
LowIQTrash » 05 Apr 2023, 2:16 am » wrote: ↑ Since 1994, when GMOs were legalized for human consumption, "they" have come out with countless """studies""" claiming GMOs are "safe."
And if you disagree you are a "quack" or "conspirasee theeowrist."
Please with a show of hands reveal yourselves if you accept these conclusions derived from aforementioned """studies."""
edit: 1992 legalized, 1994 first GMO "food" approved for sale in supermarkets
Warcok » 05 Apr 2023, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Then how come the American *** problem...err population is exploding? Abortions can't keep up with birth rates.
They're **** out carjackers faster than Klanned Parenthood can kill'em.
If Uncle Sam okays it, it's fine by me.LowIQTrash » 05 Apr 2023, 2:16 am » wrote: ↑ Since 1994, when GMOs were legalized for human consumption, "they" have come out with countless """studies""" claiming GMOs are "safe."
And if you disagree you are a "quack" or "conspirasee theeowrist."
Please with a show of hands reveal yourselves if you accept these conclusions derived from aforementioned """studies."""
edit: 1992 legalized, 1994 first GMO "food" approved for sale in supermarkets
Be honest - are you channeling Bobby the Brain Heenan?Xavier_Onassis » 05 Apr 2023, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ What symptoms have you had that seem to have been caused by GMO foods?
I imagine that some GMO foods are totally fit for human consumption, while others may not be. The people selling these as safe are not to be trusted, the FDA is more trustworthy, and of course, these things are being tested in many countries.
So pay attention to actual food scientists who give specific evidence of problems caused by GMO's.
Google "dirty dozen and clean 15."SJConspirator » 05 Apr 2023, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑ I eat organic. Non GMO as much as possible.
Common sense tells me that if there is a profit motive to double the harvest per sq. Ft. Of land thru shoddy science, it will be done, regardless of health risk. And thats exactly what GMOs do.
Don't bad mouth cheesy poofs - it's how I got buff!DeezerShoove » 05 Apr 2023, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑ You just walk around with a chip on your shoulder... or is that a Cheese Puff?
Repukes do a lot of dirty, boot-licking **** for their coporate sponsors, that is for sure.Trumprules » 05 Apr 2023, 11:47 pm » wrote: ↑ You dumb **** Republicans.
https://www.science.org/content/article ... ood-labels
By the way - that article is from 2016. You girls have made great strides in becoming wall street's first choice since then. In fact, wall street has been backing your party as their first choice for several cycles, now.Trumprules » 05 Apr 2023, 11:50 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.science.org/content/article ... ood-labels
Well **** democrats wanted those labeled as GMOs. But Republicans blocked it.