Liberal Forum

National Socialists...not National Conservatives........................American Progressivism and Germany's Nazism actually have close ties.


both Adolph Hitler and Margaret Sanger (An American Progressive) wanted to get rid of mongrel races

both Adolph Hitler and George Benard Shaw (An American Progressive) wanted to rid humanity of those they considered unfit


there is a lot more too...all you have to do is research it a little

nefarious101 » 12 Apr 2023, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 1:55 pm

National Socialists...not National Conservatives........................American Progressivism and Germany's Nazism actually have close ties.

both Adolph Hitler and Margaret Sanger (An American Progressive) wanted to get rid of mongrel races

both Adolph Hitler and George Benard Shaw (An American Progressive) wanted to rid humanity of those they considered unfit

there is a lot more too...all you have to do is research it a little

Makes sense. The left defend Ukraine also. They are full of Nazis. 

Vegas » 12 Apr 2023, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 1:56 pm

Makes sense. The left defend Ukraine also. They are full of Nazis.

Progressivism and Naziism are pretty must twins in their agenda and their narrative and always have been.


 

Better humanity through eugenics. This is the reason today's progressives fight so hard to teach lgbtqrstuv lifestyles to impressionable children. Every one they get to join is another generational piece of the human cancer removed from Gaias brest.
 

nefarious101 » 12 Apr 2023, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 1:55 pm

National Socialists...not National Conservatives........................American Progressivism and Germany's Nazism actually have close ties.

both Adolph Hitler and Margaret Sanger (An American Progressive) wanted to get rid of mongrel races

both Adolph Hitler and George Benard Shaw (An American Progressive) wanted to rid humanity of those they considered unfit
George Bernard Shaw was an Irishman, and a citizen of the UK.

there is a lot more too...all you have to do is research it a little

They never met and had no "close ties".
Margaret Sanger was an advocate for birth control and a woman's right to contraceptives.
Hitler wanted German women to have as many children as possible.
Eugenics is not and never has been a part of any progressive agenda.

You are the one that sucks at research.
WTF are "National Conservatives"?
 
 

Xavier_Onassis » 12 Apr 2023, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 3:37 pm

They never me and had no "close ties".
Margaret Sanger was an advocate for birth control and a woman's right to contraceptives.
Hitler wanted German women to have as many children as possible.
Eugenics is not and never has been a part of any progressive agenda.

You are the one that sucks at research.
WTF are "National Conservatives"?

Shhhhh Groomer - adults are talking
 

Xavier_Onassis » 12 Apr 2023, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 3:37 pm

They never me and had no "close ties".
Margaret Sanger was an advocate for birth control and a woman's right to contraceptives.
Hitler wanted German women to have as many children as possible.
Eugenics is not and never has been a part of any progressive agenda.

You are the one that sucks at research.
WTF are "National Conservatives"?

[img][/img]
Taylor & Francis Online
https://www.tandfonline.com › pdf
Perfecting Humankind: A Comparison of Progressive and Nazi Views on Eugenics, Sterilization and Abortion
by J Hunt · 1999 · Cited by 5 — States, we see an interest in more than just birth control. While Sanger did not draw a distinction between "fit" and "unfit" along racial lines, as Nazi.
 
 

Xavier_Onassis » 12 Apr 2023, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 3:37 pm

They never me and had no "close ties".
Margaret Sanger was an advocate for birth control and a woman's right to contraceptives.
Hitler wanted German women to have as many children as possible.
Eugenics is not and never has been a part of any progressive agenda.

You are the one that sucks at research.
WTF are "National Conservatives"?

read what I wrote again and try using some comprehension if any is available....then read what you wrote and tell me how you believe the two relate in any way other than your desire to make them relevant to each other...are you really that dumb?

Majik » 12 Apr 2023, 4:20 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 4:20 pm

[img][/img]
Taylor & Francis Online
https://www.tandfonline.com › pdf
Perfecting Humankind: A Comparison of Progressive and Nazi Views on Eugenics, Sterilization and Abortion
by J Hunt · 1999 · Cited by 5 — States, we see an interest in more than just birth control. While Sanger did not draw a distinction between "fit" and "unfit" along racial lines, as Nazi.

he's trying to make a pointless point base on his sheer desire to make it fit into the conversation

Xavier_Onassis » 12 Apr 2023, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 3:37 pm

They never me and had no "close ties".
Margaret Sanger was an advocate for birth control and a woman's right to contraceptives.
Hitler wanted German women to have as many children as possible.
Eugenics is not and never has been a part of any progressive agenda.

You are the one that sucks at research.
WTF are "National Conservatives"?

[img][/img]
Taylor & Francis Online
https://www.tandfonline.com › pdf
Perfecting Humankind: A Comparison of Progressive and Nazi Views on Eugenics, Sterilization and Abortion
by J Hunt · 1999 · Cited by 5 — States, we see an interest in more than just birth control. While Sanger did not draw a distinction between "fit" and "unfit" along racial lines, as Nazi.
 
 

nefarious101 » 12 Apr 2023, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 2:04 pm

Progressivism and Naziism are pretty must twins in their agenda and their narrative and always have been.

modern progressives seek to force racial integration of every American institution.  And they worship trannies.

Nazis kept races segregated within their power.  And they executed trannies.  Sorry.

do trannies make good fertilizer ??

nefarious101 » 12 Apr 2023, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 1:55 pm

National Socialists...not National Conservatives........................American Progressivism and Germany's Nazism actually have close ties.

both Adolph Hitler and Margaret Sanger (An American Progressive) wanted to get rid of mongrel races

both Adolph Hitler and George Benard Shaw (An American Progressive) wanted to rid humanity of those they considered unfit

there is a lot more too...all you have to do is research it a little

the NSDAP supported the new deal of FDR...but it would be easy to argue that the new deal came from fascism...or at least that both emerged from a similar place (syndicalism). But they also said that the new deal would ultimately fail, because it did nothing the check financial power. Anyway...there was no way that laissez faire capitalism was going to continue because it was simply making life unlivable for ordinary people and therefore provoking bolshevik revolution.

Eugenics had its origin in Francis Galton. And it works. And nothing at all is wrong with it. The NSDAP adopted it simply because it is a very sensible thing to do. Yes...in a post industrial world...where mortality rates are very low...there is a serious danger of harmful mutations to propagate at a destructive rate. Iq will drop, mental illness will increase, etc. We are seeing this phenomenon play out today.

there was no part of the NSDAP platform that sought any sort of genocide...neither in theory nor in practice. Nor was that the goal of margaret sanger.

 

if you are interested in examples of actual genocide, you could look at the roman empire. They totally genocided the carthagenians. This was under a republic. And it wasnt really a bad idea. After 3 punic wars it became obvious that the mediterranean simply wasnt big enough for both rome and carthage to exist. so genocide is neither 'left wing' nor is it always a bad idea

SJConspirator » 12 Apr 2023, 10:03 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 10:03 pm

modern progressives seek to force racial integration of every American institution.  And they worship trannies.

Nazis kept races segregated within their power.  And they executed trannies.  Sorry.

yep, it seems the modern progressives are trying a different tact; stir everyone up until there is a race war; then step in and finish it....in the name of humanity.

SJConspirator » 12 Apr 2023, 10:03 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 10:03 pm

modern progressives seek to force racial integration of every American institution.  And they worship trannies.

Nazis kept races segregated within their power.  And they executed trannies.  Sorry.

the progressive need trannies and ***....they are mentally ill, self-loathing to the extreme and make excellent activists.


compare tangerines to oranges...both look a lot alike but there are some differences.....but to a lot of people they are so similar they hardly see any differences.


I guess you could say one is American and the other German so that makes them completely different too...nothing like getting balls deep in the technicals 

FOS » 12 Apr 2023, 10:40 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 10:40 pm

the NSDAP supported the new deal of FDR...but it would be easy to argue that the new deal came from fascism...or at least that both emerged from a similar place (syndicalism). But they also said that the new deal would ultimately fail, because it did nothing the check financial power. Anyway...there was no way that laissez faire capitalism was going to continue because it was simply making life unlivable for ordinary people and therefore provoking bolshevik revolution.

Eugenics had its origin in Francis Galton. And it works. And nothing at all is wrong with it. The NSDAP adopted it simply because it is a very sensible thing to do. Yes...in a post industrial world...where mortality rates are very low...there is a serious danger of harmful mutations to propagate at a destructive rate. Iq will drop, mental illness will increase, etc. We are seeing this phenomenon play out today.

there was no part of the NSDAP platform that sought any sort of genocide...neither in theory nor in practice. Nor was that the goal of margaret sanger.

Lots of water and strong soap still won't wash off the glaring similarities.....the stain will still be there

nefarious101 » 12 Apr 2023, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 1:55 pm

National Socialists...not National Conservatives........................American Progressivism and Germany's Nazism actually have close ties.

both Adolph Hitler and Margaret Sanger (An American Progressive) wanted to get rid of mongrel races

both Adolph Hitler and George Benard Shaw (An American Progressive) wanted to rid humanity of those they considered unfit

there is a lot more too...all you have to do is research it a little

 Ignore or remove constitutional protections for the individual and promote subsidization of corporation groups by the individual = old world feudal monarchy of pagan barbarian war slavers, etc. Citizens are owned by the corporation groups they subsidize like a crop of genetically modified soy beans and the customer is always wrong. Chemical laden soy groupies develop degenerate rules and regulations that destroy the country as they censor and attack the healthy individual.
 

Bob » 13 Apr 2023, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 7:39 am

 Ignore or remove constitutional protections for the individual and promote subsidization of corporation groups by the individual = old world feudal monarchy of pagan barbarian war slavers, etc. Citizens are owned by the corporation groups they subsidize like a crop of genetically modified soy beans and the customer is always wrong. Chemical laden soy groupies develop degenerate rules and regulations that destroy the country as they censor and attack the healthy individual.

scary **** indeed

nefarious101 » 12 Apr 2023, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 1:55 pm

National Socialists...not National Conservatives........................American Progressivism and Germany's Nazism actually have close ties.


both Adolph Hitler and Margaret Sanger (An American Progressive) wanted to get rid of mongrel races

both Adolph Hitler and George Benard Shaw (An American Progressive) wanted to rid humanity of those they considered unfit


there is a lot more too...all you have to do is research it a little

Woodrow Wilson's presidency 14 points was the blueprint for Mein Kumpf.

Here is a graph with 14 points beyond the 15th position of balanced between all extreme interpretations.https://i.postimg.cc/hPN5q9QP/Picture-124.jpg

8 blue and 8 pink sides create 8 diagonal on 4 parallel vertical axses corners to 4 horizontal corners, to center vertical poles of mom and dad adding 5th generation gap specifically to numbers occupying space any rotation of the planet. that is a DNA compression ratio of 30:1 lifetimes limited to evolving forward here now.

To make it simple 24/7 remove the 16 sides added the 4 parallel vertical axses to 2 parents added 3rd generation gap of 14:1 compression ratio of 3 generation gaps.

there are 72 ways to interpret the 24 sides to this figure https://i.postimg.cc/3wtqVzgz/Picture-152.jpg
there are 6 4 sided pyramids looking towards it. there are 8 2 sided pyramids looking out from the core. looking down from any of the 6 degrees of separation are 12 sides in view and 12 out of sight but directly opposite each of the 12 in view right or left angles, top down, bottom up, front, back
all at the same time separate locations.

My read between the lines of event horizons where evolving only happens now.

Still accounts for each ancestor ever conceived at any rotation of the planet since the inception of this species having ancestrally lineages present one at a time.

Again, all humanity defies now is eternity, that is a choice made by every generation gap after birth until dead.

Tell me that wasn't the original sin and the final conflict here?