You must be a homo✓Xavier_Onassis » 19 Apr 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ Pink hair is somehow immoral?
I am no great fan of Disney, but compared to Exxon-Mobil, Disney is far less immoral.
There is nothing immoral about hiring gay young people to put on a Mickey suit, a Donald Duck suit, or a Goofy suit.
There is nothing immoral about Disney having special events days for LBTGQ people.
Yeah, we didn't do that. Or if we did, I don't remember. So it must have sucked.Cedar » 20 Apr 2023, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ The Wonderful World of Disney was a Sunday night staple in my house growing up.
I can't do those dna things - last thing I need is for the cops to finally get their hands on me.maineman » 19 Apr 2023, 7:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Is there a site designated period of mourning for Rupert?
I'm sorry... I was unaware.
Oh, and btw... I am whiter than white. Dutch/German/ Irish without a scintilla of African blood. So sez 23And Me. How about you, homo?
Poetic ****. male/female is male female in any ancestral lineage variety of this species. it is how survival works regardless the cross breeding between races and ideologies pretending living exceeds mutually evolving forward now.
I gave you the link. if you couldn't read it, we both know why.golfboy » 20 Apr 2023, 9:39 pm » wrote: ↑ And 10 years ago, they were at 111b. No where near double.
Where did the link go towards? Self event evolving or another intellectual study sustaining doubt genetics eternally separates the existing reproductions left changing population forward now.maineman » 21 Apr 2023, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑ I gave you the link. if you couldn't read it, we both know why. :rofl:
No you didn't. That's why you're running away now after getting your *** handed to you with the truth.maineman » 21 Apr 2023, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑ I gave you the link. if you couldn't read it, we both know why.
https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/char ... /net-worthgolfboy » 21 Apr 2023, 7:56 pm » wrote: ↑ No you didn't. That's why you're running away now after getting your *** handed to you with the truth.
You made up your numbers.
And another example of why you'll always be my bitch.
Date to date: 111b to 182b.maineman » 21 Apr 2023, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/char ... /net-worth
$91B in 2013
$182B in 2023.
math really IS hard when you're a dyslexic aphasic moron, ain't it?
year to year. that is why I used the term "decade" instead of "120 months"golfboy » 21 Apr 2023, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Date to date: 111b to 182b.
BWAHAHAHHAHHAAAAHAHA
Math is hard when you're a liberal.
You quote my own link back to me... because you didn't even know where to find the numbers.maineman » 21 Apr 2023, 8:10 pm » wrote: ↑ year to year. that is why I used the term "decade" instead of "120 months"
but lets go back to those two totally off the wall numbers you came up with.... funny ****.
63 versus 99? where the **** did you pull those numbers?golfboy » 21 Apr 2023, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You quote my own link back to me... because you didn't even know where to find the numbers.
A decade is 10 years.
What was the date, 10 years ago today, *******?
It's hilarious how this always happens to you.
You're what, 85? WTF are you going to learn how to read a chart?
a decade is less precice than 120 months.... it's less precise that 3652 days, and it's even less precise than 87648 hours. But decade to decade, DIsney has twice the net worth than it did a decade ago. Just like I claimed.maineman » 21 Apr 2023, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑ 63 versus 99? where the **** did you pull those numbers?
I said a decade. 2023 is a decade greater than 2013.
and your numbers ain't in either of those years. moron.
maineman » 20 Apr 2023, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑Net worth is normally defined as Market Cap. Disney is a whisker shy of $184B as of yesterdaySkans » 20 Apr 2023, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ When you say "worth" do you mean market cap? Gross Assets? Or Gross Assets less Gross Liabilities. Please clarify.
You said "Yesterday". What was 10 years ago... aka a decade ago... from yesterday?maineman » 21 Apr 2023, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑63 versus 99? where the **** did you pull those numbers?golfboy » 21 Apr 2023, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You quote my own link back to me... because you didn't even know where to find the numbers.
A decade is 10 years.
What was the date, 10 years ago today, *******?
It's hilarious how this always happens to you.
You're what, 85? WTF are you going to learn how to read a chart?
I said a decade. 2023 is a decade greater than 2013.
and your numbers ain't in either of those years. moron.
decades are imprecise numbers. in 2023, Disney has a net worth than it did in 2013.golfboy » 21 Apr 2023, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑
You said "Yesterday". What was 10 years ago... aka a decade ago... from yesterday?
*******.
a decade ago was 2013.golfboy » 21 Apr 2023, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑
You said "Yesterday". What was 10 years ago... aka a decade ago... from yesterday?
*******.
Prove you can read the link "you" provided.maineman » 21 Apr 2023, 8:30 pm » wrote: ↑ a decade ago was 2013.
you lose.
63 v. 99??? hahahahahahahahahahahaha
What was the date, a decade ago, from yesterday?maineman » 21 Apr 2023, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑ decades are imprecise numbers. in 2023, Disney has a net worth than it did in 2013.
decade to decade.golfboy » 21 Apr 2023, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑ What was the date, a decade ago, from yesterday?
I'd bet even the 5th grader you're abusing right now, could answer that question.