You're claiming again a bill can't pass the senate with fewer than 50 votes?maineman » 21 Apr 2023, 9:48 pm » wrote: ↑ of course I knew... and I know that 2023 is a decade longer than 2013.
tell me again hoiw your "fifty votes" statement is correct EVER?
63-99?????
hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
not alt all. AND I never claimed that!!!golfboy » 21 Apr 2023, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑ You're claiming again a bill can't pass the senate with fewer than 50 votes?
nobody is suggesting that you are correct when you said "yes *******, ffity votes are all that's needed to pass a bill in the senate if all senators are present and voting". If you know of any of your posse that will back you up on that claim... bring them to the thread and have them state their support for you.golfboy » 21 Apr 2023, 9:58 pm » wrote: ↑ ^^ doesn't realizing the laughing is coming from all those people pointing at him.
Yes you did.
never.
I don't see any of your girlfriends helping you, buttboy.maineman » 21 Apr 2023, 10:31 pm » wrote: ↑ And if any MAGAts on this site want to come to @golfboy's aid, now is the time to step up. Come on... step up. If 50 votes are all that is needed to pass a bill in the US Senate if all senators are present and voting, I am sure that ONE OF YOU MAGAts can produce the roll call from even ONE senate vote where 100 yea or nay votes were cast and only 50 passed a measure.
Come on @golfboy is one of your posse. Surely you're willing to put your own credibility on the line to support him. Step up. You KNOW he'd appreciate your support.
ANYBODY?
I don't see any of your girlfriends supporting you, *******.maineman » 21 Apr 2023, 10:31 pm » wrote: ↑ And if any MAGAts on this site want to come to @golfboy's aid, now is the time to step up. Come on... step up. If 50 votes are all that is needed to pass a bill in the US Senate if all senators are present and voting, I am sure that ONE OF YOU MAGAts can produce the roll call from even ONE senate vote where 100 yea or nay votes were cast and only 50 passed a measure.
Come on @golfboy is one of your posse. Surely you're willing to put your own credibility on the line to support him. Step up. You KNOW he'd appreciate your support.
ANYBODY?
^^ masturbating over his little boy fantasies again.maineman » 21 Apr 2023, 10:22 pm » wrote: ↑ @golfboy ... whipping you with your own words is so easy.... it makes me feel .... almost dirty, somehow.... like picking on a retarded kid in the playground. It was so easy, but it left me feeling guilty, almost. I got over it, and a good shower before bedtimetonight will fix this petite malaise. Good night, moron.
are you suggesting I need someone else to agree with me that 50 votes are NOT enough to pass a bill in the senate when everybody's there are voting? I don't NEED anyone. ALL I need is to show every single **** vote tally for every single vote that ended up passing a bill in the US senate to prove my point...which is, and which has ALWAYS been that it takes 51 to pass a bill in the senate if everybody votes. And you can't show even ONE roll call where that is NOT the case.golfboy » 21 Apr 2023, 10:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't see any of your butt buddies supporting you, *******.
dodge noted
Money is a symbolic form of value, correct? Content that exists is evolving in forms shaped forward from here is completely accurate, correct? people have half the value of actual life than they did a decade ago. So things cost twice as much evolving the same way now.maineman » 21 Apr 2023, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/char ... /net-worth
$91B in 2013
$182B in 2023.
math really IS hard when you're a dyslexic aphasic moron, ain't it?