Liberal Forum

Skans » 19 Apr 2023, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 8:35 am

Go Woke, Go Broke.  Disney is another casualty of the woke brigade.  Normal people with families don't want to see *** and lesbians in kids movies.  Nor do they want to be inundated with *** characters or Lesland themed rides, or even the Tranny-Bear Jamboree when they go Disney World/Land.

Disney went woke, people finally took note and now they are only worth half what they were 3 years ago.  How does Disney plan on getting all of those family-oriented customers (I mean "guests") back again?  They still do not have a clue.  So, instead of refocusing their corporate efforts,DISNEY BEGINS FIRST ROUND OF MAJOR LAYOFFS BY CUTTING 7,000 JOBS

bud light went back to horses.

need I say more?

When one visits Russia or China one sees
clean bustling subways, clean streets and sidewalks, families,
men, women, children. No trannies, ***, mutilated children. No addicts, tents, culture diseases.

Then in America.....a subway

Xavier_Onassis » 19 Apr 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 9:41 am

Pink hair is somehow immoral?
I am no great fan of Disney, but compared to Exxon-Mobil, Disney is far less immoral.

There is nothing immoral about hiring gay young people to put on a Mickey suit, a Donald Duck suit, or a Goofy suit.
There is nothing immoral about Disney having special events days for LBTGQ people.

at a park for children it is.

sootedupCyndi » 19 Apr 2023, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 9:59 am

It would be curious to find out- How many do go.

A lot do attend on the days when they host these gay events.  But, not nearly as many as ordinary families with children.  Disney never even would let other "guests" know that some big gay-bash was planned, and they would be shocked by what was going on, later to find out this was actually a planned, coordinated gay-event with Disney.  Huge mistake.

I don't know how they handle all of the gay-days at Disney now, but it used to be a big, freaking Gay-Surprise for most people.
 

Xavier_Onassis » 19 Apr 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 9:41 am

There is nothing immoral about Disney having special events days for LBTGQ people.

People don't go to Disney to get a sex education lesson on homosexuality. 

They go there for a turkey leg, a pint of ale and to ride roller coasters.

 
 

Skans » 19 Apr 2023, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 9:09 am

Second, I think Disney is ripe for an activist investor or investor group to come in and take over its management. In fact, I'm wondering why this hasn't happened yet.  I will need to look a bit further into the equity structure to try and figure this out.  Carl Icahn, Paul Singer, Dan Loeb and/or Jeffrey Smith  - y'all should be licking your chops, salivating over the wounded mouse by now.  Who's gonna move first???
 

Nelson Peltz just tried, and failed.
 

The diseases will only accelerate.
Too much momentum in that direction.

Xavier_Onassis » 19 Apr 2023, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 9:11 am

Really?   Tell that to Lady Gaga.

Let me know when Lady Gaga applies for a job bussing tables, moron.
 

Cedar » 19 Apr 2023, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 10:09 am

Nelson Peltz just tried, and failed.

Yes, and what Peltz got out of it was the slashing of 7,000 jobs.  What else did he get?  Peltz's big beef with Disney was its over-spending on streaming services, and over paying for 21st Century Fox.  The other beef - Disney messed up its succession planning - i.e. the Chapek fiasco.   They haven't revealed publicaly how they addressed these other concerns voiced by Peltz and his group.

As far as I can see, none of this addresses the core problems at Disney.  Disney is an expensive roller coaster ride that is still flying down the wrong set of tracks right now. Peltz may have been appeased, but I am a bit curious as to why a stronger group of activist investors is not taking a serous look at this right now.
 

Skans » 19 Apr 2023, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 9:58 am

We can argue about whether it is moral or not.  I recognize that you and others have differing views from me as to what is moral.

However, there is no argument that catering to gays, trannies, lesbians, etc. is incompatible with most men-women with families. Gay-Land is not what couples with kids want when attending Disney Land.  And, the vast amount of revenue coming from Disney theme parks and entertainment is from traditional male-female families with children.  Children of which their parents are very protective.  And, children these parents want to relive and even pass down their own "Disney Experience" they experienced as children.

Less than 40% of Disney visitors have children under 18 years of age.
 

Cedar » 19 Apr 2023, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 10:27 am

Less than 40% of Disney visitors have children under 18 years of age.

That's not the case in the Magic Kingdom.  This number is skewed by numbers at Epcot.  Take Epcot out of the mix, and then let's see. 

Also, if the numbers still support what you are saying after removing Epcot (I don't think it will), what's wrong with the picture when a kid's theme park being over-run by adults?
 

Xavier_Onassis » 19 Apr 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 9:41 am

Pink hair is somehow immoral?
I am no great fan of Disney, but compared to Exxon-Mobil, Disney is far less immoral.

There is nothing immoral about hiring gay young people to put on a Mickey suit, a Donald Duck suit, or a Goofy suit.
There is nothing immoral about Disney having special events days for LBTGQ people.

how did trannie light work out?

Skans » 19 Apr 2023, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 10:05 am

A lot do attend on the days when they host these gay events.  But, not nearly as many as ordinary families with children.  Disney never even would let other "guests" know that some big gay-bash was planned, and they would be shocked by what was going on, later to find out this was actually a planned, coordinated gay-event with Disney.  Huge mistake.

I don't know how they handle all of the gay-days at Disney now, but it used to be a big, freaking Gay-Surprise for most people.

The recently announced after hours event is the first gay event ever held by Disney. The "events" that you're referencing were planned and organized by the homo community themselves. It's known by most folks that frequent Disney to be the week staring on the first Saturday in June.
 

Skans » 19 Apr 2023, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 10:17 am

its over-spending on streaming services, and over paying for 21st Century Fox.

 

That right there explains the thread title. Disney over extended itself.

As much as us normal people would like to hang it on Disney's "wokeness", that just isn't the case.
 

Xavier_Onassis » 19 Apr 2023, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 9:56 am

If you are running an amusement park and gay events produce a big attendance, then that is what it makes perfect sense to do.
Disney is not counting on you to attend this or ever.

Pssst. Dr. PEDO, "gay" events produce a crowd ONCE A YEAR. That's 1 out of 365. The OTHER 364 requires NOT MENTALLY ILL PEOPLE to keep the place running. And it takes LOTS OF THEM. So you propose sacrificing the 364 non mentally ill days of profit just so you can have an "inclusive" day of mentally ill people??

THIS is why you LWNJ's need to NEVER RUN ANYTHING and be put in the same institutions these MENTALLY ILL "gay" people belong.
 

Skans » 19 Apr 2023, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 10:34 am

That's not the case in the Magic Kingdom.  This number is skewed by numbers at Epcot.  Take Epcot out of the mix, and then let's see. 

Also, if the numbers still support what you are saying after removing Epcot (I don't think it will), what's wrong with the picture when a kid's theme park being over-run by adults?

Epcot is part of Disney. I have no idea whether gay days include Epcot or not.
I am all for Disney making its own decisions, they don't need my advice and would not follow it anyway, if I had any.

Sumela » 19 Apr 2023, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 10:02 am

When one visits Russia or China one sees
clean bustling subways, clean streets and sidewalks, families,
men, women, children. No trannies, ***, mutilated children. No addicts, tents, culture diseases.

Then in America.....a subway

Isn't tyranny grand everyone obeys their multitiered chain of command working all angles of one's society's continuing self deception used to support ideology over evolving in plain sight.

Entitlement is a platitude,
Rank is an attitude,
north or south of the equator is a latitude
east and west are longitudes creating intellectual grid calculating time in a linear flow as time itself is an immovable objective.

Time and distance between positions is relative location as part of the whole, correct? Now life is series parallel events between ancestors never evolving beyond occupying space now since conceived to dead and decomposed.

No lifetime existed prior to conceived and doesn't occupy space after decomposed, right? this is an ongoing process intellectual minds doesn't have control over, just the lifetimes during their time being alive between birth and dead in plain sight changing forms since a fertilized cll started the personal evolving process for each since inception of ancestral lineages still reproducing next generation great great grandchildren one at a time replacing the 30 people that were their specific 16 great great grandparents, 8 great grandparents, 4 grandparents, 2 parenting each great great grandchild being son or daughter, grandchild, great grandchild, great great grandchild to their specific to last 4 generation of contracting Genes never duplicating a previous ancestor since inception.

Time, distance, evolving one at a time all the numbers never exceeded spontaneously alive simultaneously living one at a time, here.

You disagree with this universal constant? You promise to never agree it was possible all the time life became everything here now?

You picked the correct avatar for your personality. You behave same as Hunter Biden.

Cedar » 19 Apr 2023, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 10:45 am

That right there explains the thread title. Disney over extended itself.

As much as us normal people would like to hang it on Disney's "wokeness", that just isn't the case.

I disagree.  I would bet you anything their sales growth has slowed considerably or stagnated.
 

Skans » 19 Apr 2023, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2023, 12:32 pm

I disagree.  I would bet you anything their sales growth has slowed considerably or stagnated.

I hate it. Disney is trying so hard with it's woke pandering... They are destroying everything  that Disney ever was good!  I'm sure he would ROLL over in his grave!
All the things we grew up with- that was cute a pure- ready for the next generation!
No peter pan was Not black- No the  fairy godmother wasn't a  cross dresser- tranny dressed in gold... Rapunzel was a blonde-  And the price kissed snow white to wake her up! He wasnt a abuser!   Minnie mouse was a lady dressed in red polka dots.. now she has changed into a BLUE cartoon dressed in a pants suit! looked much like a Hilary Clinton.  wtf? subliminal there workin?